Assuming that the ego and id functions are strong, you may well be inclined to give preference to activities/interests related to those functions. However, they "act similarly" only in a superficial way, a sort of first impression.
Sure.
Assuming that the ego and id functions are strong, you may well be inclined to give preference to activities/interests related to those functions. However, they "act similarly" only in a superficial way, a sort of first impression.
Sure.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
The proper names for the clubs are:
Imaginative Ethicists - The Theocrats
Observative Logicians - The Bureaucrats
Imaginative Logicians - The Technocrats
Observative Ethicists - The Utilitarians
Last edited by domr; 06-25-2018 at 01:06 PM.
I'm not forcing anything. It's your choice whether you want to understand the philosophers or if you want to spend another 10 years and not learn anything, beside's Gulenko's next crazy DCHNXYZ+- 2.0 theory. It should be obvious that all real research into socionics died years ago, that's why I asked you why you haven't left like everyone else.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit