I mean : LII's, LSI's, ILE's, and SLE's.
I know SEE's may have some hostility for, but what do you think of
types exactly ?
Do you think they're rigid ? stone-hearted ? smart ? boring ? attractive ? unfriendly ?
What do you think oftypes exactly ?
I mean : LII's, LSI's, ILE's, and SLE's.
I know SEE's may have some hostility for, but what do you think of
types exactly ?
Do you think they're rigid ? stone-hearted ? smart ? boring ? attractive ? unfriendly ?
What do you think oftypes exactly ?
are you sure you really wanna know?
i view them as boring, irritating, insensitive, closed-minded, and rigid.
ESFp-Fi sub
6w7 sx/so/sp
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
Aren'ttypes interesting at times ? You know, their weighty thinking, their stubbornness, their large emotional scale, their loud and controlling nature ?
SEE's aren't really selfish or unfriendly. They're just boring, pushy, and weak-minded.
Are those opinions set in stone?
I've never encountered myself behaving that way. I'll have you know that a good ESI friend of mine said the exact opposite. She said that I was 'scary.' I was taken aback by that comment and I asked what she meant by being scary. She said that I was not so much intimidating, but unlike others, she never knew how I would react or what I would say. In our little group of friends, I was the unpredictable wild card. Another SEE friend of mine said something similar to that effect.
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
my SEE sister described my LII best friend as "too picky, needy, and nosey".. she doesn't know anything about typology. On the flip side, he described her as "a selfish brat".
SLEs and ILEs are fine. I don't really notice them using ti.
LIIs and LSIs seem pointless. they seem to care and get butthurt over ridiculous issues. They cause problems if you don't do what they think is ethical. Then they have these mind numbing comparisons that they expect you to listen to. I think it brainwashes me into hypnosis. I usually start drooling, my eyes go cross, and their words start sounding like morris code.
SEE can't stand LSI in a working situation because LSI will be inconsiderate of their feelings and provoke.sensitive logic areas and upset SEE
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I want to be ISTp.
sp/sx
These people often have an earthy, mysterious quality to them. They are slow to commit, but once they do it is with an attitude of life commitment, to the establishment of an impermeable bond. Others can be taken aback by how suddenly and completely this type can lock into them, and by the depth of understanding of the other’s condition. They attach to others at an organic, root level, in contrast to the other subvariant’s surface formality. The sanctuary of home is of paramount concern, and this type takes particular delight in decorating their spaces to reflect their cherished sense of taste and depth. Depth and discrimination characterize this stacking.
Motivation: to live in a secure, comfortable environment where they can pursue their private interests in depth.
INTjs: Great cooks. Socially awkward. Lost inside their own little theory systems.
Theories are best modelled by Te types who have a good understanding of reality.
Ti types are too subjective in their understanding. Not even an Fe type would appreciate their private theories about the world.
Socionics is a science, not a theory of INTjs combining their powers together to make one little rubber band ball.
I want to be ISTp.
sp/sx
These people often have an earthy, mysterious quality to them. They are slow to commit, but once they do it is with an attitude of life commitment, to the establishment of an impermeable bond. Others can be taken aback by how suddenly and completely this type can lock into them, and by the depth of understanding of the other’s condition. They attach to others at an organic, root level, in contrast to the other subvariant’s surface formality. The sanctuary of home is of paramount concern, and this type takes particular delight in decorating their spaces to reflect their cherished sense of taste and depth. Depth and discrimination characterize this stacking.
Motivation: to live in a secure, comfortable environment where they can pursue their private interests in depth.
LSI is ISTJ, right? My boss/buddy is one. Here's how non-work related conversations go:
Me: Oh my gosh. Do you ever watch those shows on TLC about people who have cheated death?
Him: Yes, sometimes.
Me. OK. So there was a guy, he was drunk one night, on the 17th floor of a hotel. He runs down the hall...and you know how they have long windows at the end of the hallway in hotels?
Him: Yeah
Me: Ok. So his depth perception got all messed up and the guy RAN through the window! 17 stories up! He fell through the window! He was 350 pounds, and they say his fat saved him. Isn't that nuts?
Him: Do they have footage of him falling?
Me: Huh? well...umm, no...
Him: Impossible. No one can fall 17 stories and live.
Me: But it was on the news... they interviewed the EMT on site and everything. I can send you the link later on.
Him: It didn't happen. 17 stories? Give me a break. If you fall 17 stories you are dead.
Me: But...The guy was talking on TV.. they had pics of him in the hospital and everything.
Him: I don't believe it.
Me: Why would they make it up? What would be the point? They say he fell on this belly and his fat saved him!
Him: I don't believe it
Me.![]()
I'm just an effin ray of sunshine
HotSauce, this is exactly the way my LSI GF thinks. She strongly rejects information, regardless of its source, if it doesn't fit into her idea of what can and can't be true.
I'm not sure how she initially determines what can and can't be true.
Half the time she suspects I'm lying to her, even though I only tell her the straight truth. For example, she doesn't believe a person can get hired as an Engineer without having a degree in Engineering. She says, it just doesn't happen. The fact that it happened to me and to a number of people I know gets rejected. This might have something to do with having natural faith in well-defined systems (LSI's are system-builders), or having EIE's as Duals, or maybe something else. I dunno. She's actually brilliant and very creative in almost every other way.
Ti doms are so annoying because they ask me way too many questions that aren't personal and seem to be asked just to annoy me. LIIs are kinda better because they're democratic = not a total douchebag about it.