
Originally Posted by
Loki
It's strange. I ran into Myers Briggs first of course. I found it didn't make sense. I thought it was all a lot of vague stuff that didn't quite work. I of course hadn't done some thorough study of it (I didn't think it would be worth the time). Then I ran into Socionics. At first my interpretations of Socionics were distorted by MB influence and I was aware of this, but wasn't sure what form the distortion was taking. Now the "distortion" is growing increasingly absent to the point that it's starting to go away entirely. And when I think about MB typology now it seems like total nonsense. So I don't really know how to evaluate things according to it anymore.
All I can say is if you answer the questions on one of the MB-based online tests so it works with the following pattern:
- more sociable and outgoing and attention seeking than not
- more organized, structure-philic, orderful than not
- more logical than emotional and less likely to factor emotions into decision making, and not too interested in consoling others or pondering your feelings for hours
- more focused on the abstract than the concrete, more interested in ideas than practical application of them, less focused on the "here and now," interested in theory, insights, psychic premonitions (lol)
Then you'll get ENTJ.
(ETA) And maybe even cute little percentages, like
55% E; 45% I
80% N; 20% S
90% T; 10% F
65% J; 35% P