yup, that's petraeus, not phaedrus.
I think he's intuitive, logical, and rational
LII or LIE? or something else?
video
http://youtube.com/watch?v=n40pjtEtIp0
http://youtube.com/watch?v=nKTD-gjpAN8
yup, that's petraeus, not phaedrus.
I think he's intuitive, logical, and rational
LII or LIE? or something else?
video
http://youtube.com/watch?v=n40pjtEtIp0
http://youtube.com/watch?v=nKTD-gjpAN8
Lie > Lii
^ wtf? I write all caps and it comes out like this. ^
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I saw the two videos, and to me he's LSE>>LIE.
His arguments are all Te, but it's Si>Ni. Especially in the second interview, she asks questions from a Ni perspective, which he either answers with Si and Te, or basically shrugs. His inclination is to get into detailed physical descriptions of markets, etc.
![]()
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
I was going to say LIE > LSE > LII, but I wasn't sure and I didn't see the second video.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly