As doubts are all the rage

[Creepy-]

What type am I?

I'm curious to see if there are any doubts.

[Joy]

none here!

[Creepy-]

Haha... who voted ESTj?

[Rocky]

It was probably someone making a statement about how much the concept of this thread is a JOKE.

[stevENTj]

that was me just being a smart ass

[Joy]

although sometimes I think you could be an ENTj...

[Creepy-]

How amusing that the only votes aside from INFp were for Ixxj types (apart from you witty people voting ESTj :wink: ).

Was the ISTj vote serious???

@Joy: ENTj?

[Gilly]

Just to clarify, my thread was the result of me having legitimate doubts about my type, not just wanting attention (as odd as that may seem for an ENTp...)

[Creepy-]

Just to clarify, my thread was the result of me having legitimate doubts about my type, not just wanting attention (as odd as that may seem for an ENTp...)

I was more referring to Joy and rmcnew.

To clarify my position - this thread is part of the whole world domination scheme :wink:

[Gilly]

Fair enough.

[MySaviour]

if you said you were an ENFp.. I'd probably believe you.

PS: its amazing how these joke threads get more votes than the serious ones...

[Catholic Schoolboy]

That is because everyone is done with you Joel.

[Creepy-]

PS: its amazing how these joke threads get more votes than the serious ones...

It's because you're Gamma

if you said you were an ENFp.. I'd probably believe you.

If only I was an extrovert :wink:

[Creepy-]

If I was to seriously doubt my type...

Introversion (Ixxx)

Strong Intuition (xNxx)
Weak Sensing (xNxx)
Weak Logic (xxFx)
Lack of confidence in Ethics (xxFp, xxTx)

Strong (ENxj, INxp)

So, the only "logical" conclusion is INFp, or maybe INTp (I suppose you might be able to argue that I really have weak Ethics and just lack confidence in Logic) but do I really come across as a Logical type?

Any disputes?

[Gilly]

I don't think anyone really had any doubt in the first place, Ishy.

[Creepy-]

I don't think anyone really had any doubt in the first place, Ishy.

I know.... I'm disappointed, actually. Aside from wanting attention (I'll never admit it, though :wink: ), I was actually hoping someone would take this seriously so we could have a discussion about functions and relationships and I would come out with a better understanding of Socionics.

*sigh*