I would be willing to bet actual money (and I am not a gambling man) that most of the people who voted for IEI actually had an IEE in mind when they cast their vote. I fucking promise you.
ILE
SEI
ESE
LII
LSE
IEI
EIE
LSI
LIE
ESI
SEE
ILI
LSE
EII
IEE
SLI
No.
I don't know.
I would be willing to bet actual money (and I am not a gambling man) that most of the people who voted for IEI actually had an IEE in mind when they cast their vote. I fucking promise you.
Doesn't "suck" at all, I just enter, kill and leave, without being distracted by anything else, @Ath.
Liek in the case of that particular guy (before yesterday) who kept telling me he is from criminal police and you don't say that to my face after I had a one too many.
A hardass LSE, eh? Well, at least they exist. I'll lean on your PA-type as explanation...
I got something else after I took it again (didn't post), so feel free to lean on everything you want to lean on. But it is interesting you use the info you collect, going to keep that in mind. Heh.Originally Posted by Ath
Accuracy is def a problem with anything typology... I'll contact you about that at some later point, mkay?
Yeah sure, I'll leave you my address so you can send me more fines.
More SEI and ESI needed to vote and change this silly thread in their favour. Who the hell started this anyway? Oh I see, Well, there are people and there is Joy.
EDIT: Okay, I'm going to "vote" - every single one that doesn't agree with me.
Last edited by Absurd; 02-24-2014 at 11:28 AM.
you wound me, sir you wound me deeply.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote