True but "no true Scotsman" fallacy is a primary example of Ti >> Te fallacy.
Here for reference:
Argument: "No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."
Reply: "But my uncle Angus, who is a Scotsman, likes sugar with his porridge."
Rebuttal: "Aye, but no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."
A Te >> Ti fallacy would be roughly something like:
Argument: "Human and chimpanzee do not have common ancestors"
Reply: "But human and chimpanzee share many common features like having 97% of their dna in common. Human and cat have somewhat less. Human and worm even less. Human and bacteria even less. But still they all share something in common. It is the most logical conclusion that they have common ancestors"
Rebuttal. "So does water melon and cloud have the same ancestors because they both have similar level of water concentration? Perhaps they both descend from humans who have a little bit less? Your argument is just stupid."
The lesson: try to use functions in some kind of balanced way. Like Herzy apparently does (except perhaps Fi ).