Results 1 to 29 of 29

Thread: The Model I've been working on is referred to as Model B in Russia

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Hacking your soul since the beginning of time Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,084
    Mentioned
    196 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default The Model I've been working on is referred to as Model B in Russia

    It was created by Bukalov. It seems to be fairly popular from some of the readings I've read about it, but I haven't been able to find articles that are actually on it.
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    Ni-IEI-N 4w3 sx/so
    Posts
    8,869
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    awesome...

  3. #3
    Hacking your soul since the beginning of time Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,084
    Mentioned
    196 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    The problem is that there hasn't been a lot translated. Some articles need to be found on this.
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

  4. #4

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,577
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    boukalovs model is probably very different. but i dont know a thing about it so ill shut up.

  6. #6
    Hacking your soul since the beginning of time Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,084
    Mentioned
    196 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niffweed17 View Post
    boukalovs model is probably very different. but i dont know a thing about it so ill shut up.
    You still think my model is wrong because INTp in my model doesn't fit you. No offense to you are anything, and I know you'll probably respond with something sarcastic(I would too), but you are not INTp. For some reason people on here have the idea that INTps are the original seeking imaginative types. That is simply not the case, INTps prefer routine and normalness. And while I know your going to continue to disagree with me, I'm pretty certain I am correct.
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

  7. #7
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hitta View Post
    You still think my model is wrong because INTp in my model doesn't fit you. No offense to you are anything, and I know you'll probably respond with something sarcastic(I would too), but you are not INTp. For some reason people on here have the idea that INTps are the original seeking imaginative types. That is simply not the case, INTps prefer routine and normalness. And while I know your going to continue to disagree with me, I'm pretty certain I am correct.
    Don't you find this inversion between LII and ILI strange ? Isn't normalness related to rather ?

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,577
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hitta View Post
    You still think my model is wrong because INTp in my model doesn't fit you.

    no; i think your model is wrong because it is unsourced and insensible Ti-blather and bullshit, because it explains nothing, and because it is stupid.

  9. #9
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hitta View Post
    You still think my model is wrong because INTp in my model doesn't fit you. No offense to you are anything, and I know you'll probably respond with something sarcastic(I would too), but you are not INTp. For some reason people on here have the idea that INTps are the original seeking imaginative types. That is simply not the case, INTps prefer routine and normalness. And while I know your going to continue to disagree with me, I'm pretty certain I am correct.

    *sigh*
    Last edited by UDP; 02-01-2008 at 05:57 AM. Reason: many reasons, mostly refraining from going down a road I see no utility in going down - a waste of time
    Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
    If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.

    ~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
    ~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    TIM
    TiNe
    Posts
    7,858
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    For some reason people on here have the idea that INTps are the original seeking imaginative types. That is simply not the case, INTps prefer routine and normalness.
    What you're missing, Hitta, is that those behaviors are not mutually exclusive. Seeking normalness, an INTp may seek the creation of a new, original means of creating normality.

    What you're suggesting by this statement, is that there are no INTps who engage themselves in the formulation of strategy, which is absurd.
    Last edited by tcaudilllg; 02-01-2008 at 08:41 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •