Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: Supervisor's effect on supervisee's ideas

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    snegledmaca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,900
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Supervisor's effect on supervisee's ideas

    In a mental excessive, well, letting my mind wander, I wondered just how exactly does the supervisor's grip on the supervise's balls manifest itself. And something occurred to me. I remembered about just how communism has butchered the ideas of karl marx. So that got me thinking, does our supervisor take our best "fruits" and completely destroys them? Like, it doesn't matter how great the theory that the LII makes, philosophy, physics, something, the SLE will find a way to "violate" it, like say build a weapon of mass destruction based on the LII-s ideas or some such thing. Also perhaps another example of this, an IEI makes MBTI and the LIE-s use it to determine hiring policies. Or an EII establishing a religion and SEE-s start carrying out religious discrimination, persecution, wars.

    In essence, the main point being, on a makrosocionical scale does this thing manifest itself?

  2. #2
    Hacking your soul since the beginning of time Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,084
    Mentioned
    196 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snegledmaca View Post
    In a mental excessive, well, letting my mind wander, I wondered just how exactly does the supervisor's grip on the supervise's balls manifest itself. And something occurred to me. I remembered about just how communism has butchered the ideas of karl marx. So that got me thinking, does our supervisor take our best "fruits" and completely destroys them? Like, it doesn't matter how great the theory that the LII makes, philosophy, physics, something, the SLE will find a way to "violate" it, like say build a weapon of mass destruction based on the LII-s ideas or some such thing. Also perhaps another example of this, an IEI makes MBTI and the LIE-s use it to determine hiring policies. Or an EII establishing a religion and SEE-s start carrying out religious discrimination, persecution, wars.

    In essence, the main point being, on a makrosocionical scale does this thing manifest itself?
    Well the supervisor will have the base function that the supervisee has as an agenda. Take the INTj ENFp relationship. The INTjs base function is -Ti/+Te and the ENFps hidden agenda is the same, -Ti/+Te. The INTj is able to help the ENFp manifest the function into the ego.
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

  3. #3
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snegledmaca View Post
    In a mental excessive, well, letting my mind wander, I wondered just how exactly does the supervisor's grip on the supervise's balls manifest itself. And something occurred to me. I remembered about just how communism has butchered the ideas of karl marx. So that got me thinking, does our supervisor take our best "fruits" and completely destroys them? Like, it doesn't matter how great the theory that the LII makes, philosophy, physics, something, the SLE will find a way to "violate" it, like say build a weapon of mass destruction based on the LII-s ideas or some such thing. Also perhaps another example of this, an IEI makes MBTI and the LIE-s use it to determine hiring policies. Or an EII establishing a religion and SEE-s start carrying out religious discrimination, persecution, wars.

    In essence, the main point being, on a makrosocionical scale does this thing manifest itself?
    I'm not sure how your examples play out. For instance, if Marx was ILE, his supervisor is EII, which weren't really involved in communism as a type.

    But apart from that, what you are describing feels not very correctly, because the "implementing ideas" quadra is Beta, which would then be the one "destroying" the ideas of Alpha.

    And how would that work for the SEI supervising the EIE, for instance?
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  4. #4
    snegledmaca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,900
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat View Post
    I'm not sure how your examples play out. For instance, if Marx was ILE, his supervisor is EII, which weren't really involved in communism as a type.
    Hmm, perhaps this can be used as a method of determining people's types? Also, perhaps their types are irrelevant but there is more emphasis on informational manifestation of their work, for example, marx may have been ILE but his work was "LII" and thus abuseable by SLE-s.

    But apart from that, what you are describing feels not very correctly, because the "implementing ideas" quadra is Beta, which would then be the one "destroying" the ideas of Alpha.
    Not certain I understand you here fully. Could you elaborate.

    And how would that work for the SEI supervising the EIE, for instance?
    Hmmm, the EIE makes a organization to fight for a cause and the SEI-s (ab)uses it to gather people for parties, sex orgies or something?

  5. #5
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snegledmaca View Post
    Not certain I understand you here fully. Could you elaborate.
    Well, one concept of socionics - not universally accepted - is that in terms of generation of ideas, it works like this:

    - Alpha generates all sorts of ideas, but generating them is given priority over implementing them
    - Beta picks specific ideas from amongst those, according to their own criteria, and their priority is to implement them
    - Gamma shoots down, among those, the ideas that (according to their own criteria) are impractical, evil, or both
    - Delta finally finds more inventive, productive and beneficial ways of using those ideas that "survived" the above process.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  6. #6
    snegledmaca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,900
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat View Post
    Well, one concept of socionics - not universally accepted - is that in terms of generation of ideas, it works like this:

    - Alpha generates all sorts of ideas, but generating them is given priority over implementing them
    - Beta picks specific ideas from amongst those, according to their own criteria, and their priority is to implement them
    - Gamma shoots down, among those, the ideas that (according to their own criteria) are impractical, evil, or both
    - Delta finally finds more inventive, productive and beneficial ways of using those ideas that "survived" the above process.
    I'm wondering whether ones supervisors naturally "abuse" ones great accomplishments. I don't see how this above would be against what I'm saying as the manner in which it is done could very well align with those assumptions.

  7. #7
    escaping anndelise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    TIM
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp
    Posts
    6,359
    Mentioned
    215 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snegledmaca View Post
    I'm wondering whether ones supervisors naturally "abuse" ones great accomplishments. I don't see how it would be against what I'm saying as the manner in which it is done could very well align with those assumptions.
    um, i'm not sure if what i'm about to write is along the lines of what you're asking about
    (i don't understand the political/philosophical examples given, so i'm not sure if this will fit or not)

    there are a couple of different ways that the supervisor/supervisee relationship can go
    and i believe that it can be either of these ways within any "pair" and within any situation
    (note: "pair" refers to any two people who are in a socionical supervisor/supervisee interaction)

    * the supervisee is doing something,
    -> the supervisor is aware of possible information that the supervisee is not aware of and/or is not keeping in mind,
    -> the supervisor informs the supervisee of this information

    * the supervisor is doing something,
    -> the supervisee is aware of possible results/consequences that the supervisor is not aware of and/or is not keeping in mind,
    -> the supervisee informs the supervisor of these possible results/consequences

    note: the informing can be done in any manner, positive or negative, regardless of position
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp

  8. #8
    Logos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,407
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snegledmaca View Post
    In a mental excessive, well, letting my mind wander, I wondered just how exactly does the supervisor's grip on the supervise's balls manifest itself. And something occurred to me. I remembered about just how communism has butchered the ideas of karl marx.
    Marx did not advocate Marxism, he advocated Communism (hence Communist Manifesto and not the Marxist Manifesto). It would only be later that it would be labeled as Marxism as a means to distinguish it from other schools of Communist thought (Leninism, Stalinism, Trotskyism, Maoism, etc.). So to say that Communism somehow butchered the ideas of Karl Marx is just about like saying that Platonism butchered the ideas of Plato. And I am quite puzzled as to how an ILE could produce anything other than an ILE work. Why do you think that communism/Marxism is LII? Because it is a system?

    So that got me thinking, does our supervisor take our best "fruits" and completely destroys them? Like, it doesn't matter how great the theory that the LII makes, philosophy, physics, something, the SLE will find a way to "violate" it, like say build a weapon of mass destruction based on the LII-s ideas or some such thing. Also perhaps another example of this, an IEI makes MBTI and the LIE-s use it to determine hiring policies. Or an EII establishing a religion and SEE-s start carrying out religious discrimination, persecution, wars.

    In essence, the main point being, on a makrosocionical scale does this thing manifest itself?
    In short, no. Could you imagine an SLE (or any sane type) willingly touching Kant's A Critique of Pure Reason to somehow destroy or subvert it? At most the SLE may just say, "After reading and following the premises set forth in A Critique of Pure Reason, I have come to the conclusion that Kant just needs to get laid."

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat View Post
    Well, one concept of socionics - not universally accepted - is that in terms of generation of ideas, it works like this:

    - Alpha generates all sorts of ideas, but generating them is given priority over implementing them
    - Beta picks specific ideas from amongst those, according to their own criteria, and their priority is to implement them
    - Gamma shoots down, among those, the ideas that (according to their own criteria) are impractical, evil, or both
    - Delta finally finds more inventive, productive and beneficial ways of using those ideas that "survived" the above process.
    The problem with that approach - and why it is not universally accepted - is that it produces an unrealistic assembly line image, while taking out the dynamic and chaotic interchange quadras as well as the contribution of all quadras being made in all four steps to their own quadra-specific purposes.
    "Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
    Johari Box

  9. #9
    snegledmaca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,900
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Logos View Post
    Marx did not advocate Marxism, he advocated Communism (hence Communist Manifesto and not the Marxist Manifesto). It would only be later that it would be labeled as Marxism as a means to distinguish it from other schools of Communist thought (Leninism, Stalinism, Trotskyism, Maoism, etc.). So to say that Communism somehow butchered the ideas of Karl Marx is just about like saying that Platonism butchered the ideas of Plato. And I am quite puzzled as to how an ILE could produce anything other than an ILE work. Why do you think that communism/Marxism is LII? Because it is a system?
    Ahm... impressions? As in, not all of us consider trivial things in depth and prefer to skim over them with a general impression.

    Also, I meant communism not as an idea but as the system that murdered, tortured and enslaved millions. I am actually surprised how you can consider it as *just* somebodies thoughts on a piece of paper and completely disregard this other part of it.

    In short, no. Could you imagine an SLE (or any sane type) willingly touching Kant's A Critique of Pure Reason to somehow destroy or subvert it? At most the SLE may just say, "After reading and following the premises set forth in A Critique of Pure Reason, I have come to the conclusion that Kant just needs to get laid."
    How narrow minded of you. As a matter of fact yes I can, I can imagine everybody abusing everything, and just because *you* can't imagine it doesn't mean it's not real. And my point not about a willing destruction but a natural, unnoticed action.

  10. #10
    Logos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,407
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snegledmaca View Post
    Ahm... impressions? As in, not all of us consider trivial things in depth and prefer to skim over them with a general impression.
    What does this have to do with anything?

    Also, I meant communism not as an idea but as the system that murdered, tortured and enslaved millions.
    How does the death toll of capitalist nations and system compare?

    I am actually surprised how you can consider it as *just* somebodies thoughts on a piece of paper and completely disregard this other part of it.
    Well 1) the Communist Manifesto is just Marx & Engels' thoughts on a piece of paper (pamphlets really); 2) "isms" don't do anything, people do; 3) I fail to see how I am necessarily disregarding anything in this matter as I am just correcting flaws that appear to be in your argument.

    How narrow minded of you.
    How condescending of you.

    As a matter of fact yes I can, I can imagine everybody abusing everything,
    Barney gives you two gold stars for your imagination. But it was something of an exaggeration on my part, hence the "or any sane type" in parentheses, and since you failed to see that, I'm taking your two gold stars away.

    and just because *you* can't imagine it doesn't mean it's not real.
    True, but the converse also holds true: just because you can imagine it does not mean that it is real (thank you Gaunilo and Immanuel Kant and boo! Anselm).

    And my point not about a willing destruction but a natural, unnoticed action.
    Well find an SLE who has destroyed A Critique of Pure Reason through a natural, unnoticed action and how they did it, and then we will talk.
    "Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
    Johari Box

  11. #11
    snegledmaca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,900
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Logos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by snegledmaca View Post
    Ahm... impressions? As in, not all of us consider trivial things in depth and prefer to skim over them with a general impression.
    What does this have to do with anything?
    Well you asked

    Why do you think that communism/Marxism is LII? Because it is a system?
    so I answered. Was it not obvious? It seemed obvious enough to me.

    How does the death toll of capitalist nations and system compare?
    God lord, irrelevant, that is not the topic here. That it happened was my point and that is enough of the relevant context.

    Well 1) the Communist Manifesto is just Marx & Engels' thoughts on a piece of paper (pamphlets really); 2) "isms" don't do anything, people do; 3) I fail to see how I am necessarily disregarding anything in this matter as I am just correcting flaws that appear to be in your argument.
    Argh, you're disregarding my whole point by focusing on irrelevant trivialities. That was not the manner in which I meant it, you are ascribing context that is not there and are working with it. The flaws you see are of your own creation.

    Quote Originally Posted by snegledmaca View Post
    How narrow minded of you.
    How condescending of you.
    Gah, did you or did you not write this?


    At most the SLE may just say, "After reading and following the premises set forth in A Critique of Pure Reason, I have come to the conclusion that Kant just needs to get laid."
    narrow minded is precisely it.

    True, but the converse also holds true: just because you can imagine it does not mean that it is real (thank you Gaunilo and Immanuel Kant and boo! Anselm).
    Well.... that's kinda the whole point of this thread, to check with otehr people on the validity of my assumption.

    Well find an SLE who has destroyed A Critique of Pure Reason through a natural, unnoticed action and how they did it, and then we will talk.
    I did not state that every single thing will be destroyed. I'm trying to discus a general pattern not individual sweeping occurrences.

  12. #12
    Logos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,407
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snegledmaca View Post
    Well you asked

    so I answered. Was it not obvious? It seemed obvious enough to me.
    I would hope that it would be obvious enough for yourself, but no it was not obvious enough for me. I like to have things spelled out for me and have people walk me by the hand through things.

    God lord, irrelevant, that is not the topic here. That it happened was my point and that is enough of the relevant context.
    You put it on the table of discussion when you wrote: "Also, I meant communism not as an idea but as the system that murdered, tortured and enslaved millions." Yes the deaths and the bad stuff happened, but when you just attribute this to the system of communism in such broad strokes it would make capitalism just as culpable. That is why I threw it out there, because you fail to be seeing that saying "Also, I meant communism not as an idea but as the system that murdered, tortured and enslaved millions" holds as much weight as saying "Also, I meant capitalism not as an idea but as the system that murdered, tortured and enslaved millions." I'm not trying to defend communism. I'm not slamming capitalism. I'm not denying the deaths or the bad stuff. I'm trying to defend historical accuracy of information! But when you say that it is the system itself that is doing the action as if it were a device designed for the said actions, then that shows a complete disregard for the political and historical complexities of the situations as well as the system itself.

    Argh, you're disregarding my whole point by focusing on irrelevant trivialities.
    And that's the problem, you don't have a whole point, just a wall of trivialities. I'm sorry for taking this out of context too, but those are the ropes of -idiocy.

    That was not the manner in which I meant it, you are ascribing context that is not there and are working with it. The flaws you see are of your own creation.
    I like to learn, and sometimes that requires that I be corrected in such matters as I can be a bit dense at times, so please point out the flaws of my own creation.

    Gah, did you or did you not write this?
    Yes.

    Did you or did you not fail to see the self-depreciating humor in this?
    At most the SLE may just say, "After reading and following the premises set forth in A Critique of Pure Reason, I have come to the conclusion that Kant just needs to get laid."
    So it would seem that you likewise failed to see the context laden within the text. Should I perhaps dance some more around "or any sane type" as a means highlighting your failure in this regard?

    I did not state that every single thing will be destroyed. I'm trying to discus a general pattern not individual sweeping occurrences.
    Well have you found any patterns or generalities worth discussing?
    "Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
    Johari Box

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •