that 4th picture is not alpha or ESE in any way
that 4th picture is not alpha or ESE in any way
If she were Ni there would be much more interaction between us and her as she attempts to delve into herself. So far she has shown no intention of doing that but instead prefers the lighthearted exchange of alpha. The sensory focus is her focus on the immediate. My impression is that she takes things at face value, does not attempt to ascribe complex meanign to simple things.
4 enneagrams typically don't take things at face value - especially 4w5's (which is the most common enneagram for INFp's). and your assertion that she would have gone more in depth if she was Ni is unreliable. I could see alpha, but probably ISFp. her expression is more calm.Originally Posted by snegledmaca
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
being image focussed can indeed be type related, my dear.
quote talking about average level enneagram threes:
"Become image-conscious, highly concerned with how they are perceived."
came from this site:
http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/TypeThree.asp
Oh yes! and to those talking about me not having a description and me not interacting...
I'm trying my hardest NOT to say much on here or interact with you guys because the point is V.I. (hahaha! so much for not saying anything!)
I wanted to see if you could guess my type WITHOUT me saying much about it.
Fe dominants - "I wonder how others percieve me, I want them to think good. I want good feedback"
Fe creative - "I don't want to step on anyone's toes but I want others to think good of me."
Ti dominants (Fe dual-seeking) - "I hope I fit in."
Ti creative (Fe hidden agenda) - "I hope they think I'm a fun person!"
Fe role too strong- "I want people to like me. I want them to think I'm wonderful."
any type - "my parents never payed enough attention to me, I want to show people that I'm a great person."
etc
Enneagram has some correlation, but not like SOME people here are saying!
And people seem to be finished with your VI. Tell us your type already and lets see who was right. Without a description, this is as far as typing goes. People just argue what they think they are seeing. I don't think you're atype, whereas some are quite sure that you are. Some people think you're ENFp, many think you're ESFj. I don't think you'll get new information.
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
Heh, I am no expert at VI (don't really think there are any here). I only compare pics and go with the vibe I get, unless it happens to be really obvious type pics. But it's fun to playSometimes I get it right and sometimes not. But I get it right way more times than if it would be mere speculation (pure chance one shot in 16), so there has to be something to this VI thing. But it certainly isn't as easy as looking at four or five pics and declare a person's life story and type.
INFp
If your sea chart does not match reality, go with reality (Old mariner saying)
There is no poll here so I counted votes. I did it in a hurry, so I possibly counted some votes twice (if someone posted many times) and i could miss sth, but nvm...
First is ENFp with 9 points, then ESFj/INFp - 6, ENFj/ESFj/ENTp - 5 (I hope you're none of them)
The only type that hasn't been mentioned is ISTp
Alpha has 19 pt, Beta 15, Gamma 7 and Delta 11
You more likely identified her as a F type - 69%, N - 62%, J - 58%, and E - 60%
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
this isn't "blasphemy!"....I was talking about the nature of 4's...the only socionics connection I made was that INFp's are commonly fours, which is fuckin true.Originally Posted by Kristiina
well, maybe with enneagram, I was talking about cognitive functions, not surfacy shit. you shouldn't type yourself based off such traits; you should look at your perception of things, i.e. static/dynamic, how you think...Originally Posted by theMime
point taken.
with socioinics definitly...looking at things like perception and how one thinks is the way to go!
I suppose I worded it weird but what was going through my head with that whole image thing (however logical or illogical it was) was that I was trying to figure out whether I was more of an attention craving, image concious enneagram 4 or if i was more of a curious, knowledge hungry, skeptical four. yup.
So what type are you natalie?
ENFp, INFp, or in a Ti quadra?
D-SEI9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
ha, yes. 4. that picture reveals it all. did you purposely put it as the fourth?Originally Posted by theMime
what type do YOU think you are?
all your pics point to INFp. I get the curious, identity-seeking vibe behind the calm waters, so to speak.
omg hi natalie, what's up?????
D-SEI9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
no, what video?Originally Posted by theMime
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
hmm...my guess was wrong...w/e. how did you come to that conclusion, mime?
I could definitely see someone thinking you as IxTx because of your general demeanor. but wait, you didn't answer the second part of my question: how did you come to the conclusion?Originally Posted by theMime
Carla,
First off, I appreciate you trying to help me come up with the most effective method of typing.
I did research about Si, Se, Fi, and Fe I simply forgot to add that in my reply about how I came to the conclusion of my type.
In fact In the description I posted of myself there's a sentence in there somewhere about my Si...I said something about how I'm good at percieving my internal reactions to external stimuli which is what wikisocion said was an Si thing.
But even had I not known which of my funcions were introverted and which were extroverted I still would have known I was an ISFp because knowing for certain that I'm an I, an S, an F, and a p can only lead to one thing...ISFp...regardless of whether I knew or didn't know which functions were extroverted or introverted. It was after I knew for certain that I was those four letters that I researched introverted sensing and feeling which confirmed that I am indeed ISFp. Starting out looking at the introverted and extroverted aspects of functions will probably make it easier to come to a conclusion and come to it more quickly but that doesn't mean that the method I used didn't work.
Last edited by theMime.; 01-13-2008 at 06:19 PM.
yeah, well, I agree with carla that you shouldn't type this way, but since you were able to find your type, it doesn't matter.Originally Posted by theMime
yes I agree too.
That method (the one Carla mentioned) certainly would have been quicker!
haha.
I just wanted to point out that just becuase I didn't use the most effective method it doesn't mean I'm not an ISFp because due to my certainty of my four letters by default I came to right conclusion regardless of the fact that it's not the best method of typing.
I agree that you sound ISFp, or at least that's very likely, but this isn't a good way to type. I, S, F, and p aren't used the way they are in MBTI and typical definitions of those letters can be confusing, misleading, or meaningless when looked at individually in Socionics.
Read this two blog entries - they explain it better than I can: http://socionist.blogspot.com/search/label/dichotomies
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
SF 4 LYFE.
Just because I might be dumb when it comes to theoretical things I make up in languages.
and love.
D-SEI9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
From your responses, ISFp sounds right.
INTp
sx/sp