Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: four subtypes

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE
    Posts
    24,507
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default four subtypes

    Are there descriptions of these anywhere?
    SEE

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  2. #2
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,685
    Mentioned
    95 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The other two being Super-Id functions? I didn't know that theory had actually been developed past conceptualization.
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA.
    TIM
    INTj
    Posts
    4,497
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    detail had a thread

    http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ad.php?t=12416

    wasn't aware this is was something that was circulated (the idea)

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,577
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilly View Post
    The other two being Super-Id functions? I didn't know that theory had actually been developed past conceptualization.
    ostensibly she meant four subtypes a la something like LSE Te-Te, LSE Te-Si, LSE Si-Te, LSE Si-Si (this is terrible notation but you get the idea).


    i seem to remember rick suggesting that these kinds of extended subtype systems exist among the crazy russian Ti-ists, whereas the estimative subtype is a DarkAngelFireWolf69 creation.

  5. #5
    Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    9,168
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niffweed17 View Post
    ostensibly she meant four subtypes a la something like LSE Te-Te, LSE Te-Si, LSE Si-Te, LSE Si-Si (this is terrible notation but you get the idea).
    That's a horrible concept. What is the point?

  6. #6
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE
    Posts
    24,507
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Gilly had it right.
    SEE

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  7. #7
    Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    9,168
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    As in which Super-Id function you use more? So if you're an LSE Te-Se, it means Te is more evident in you externally (and maybe internally) than Si, and Se is more evident than Ti?

    It's still a shit idea.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •