Are there descriptions of these anywhere?
Are there descriptions of these anywhere?
The other two being Super-Id functions? I didn't know that theory had actually been developed past conceptualization.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
detail had a thread
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ad.php?t=12416
wasn't aware this is was something that was circulated (the idea)
ostensibly she meant four subtypes a la something like LSE Te-Te, LSE Te-Si, LSE Si-Te, LSE Si-Si (this is terrible notation but you get the idea).
i seem to remember rick suggesting that these kinds of extended subtype systems exist among the crazy russian Ti-ists, whereas the estimative subtype is a DarkAngelFireWolf69 creation.
Gilly had it right.
As in which Super-Id function you use more? So if you're an LSE Te-Se, it means Te is more evident in you externally (and maybe internally) than Si, and Se is more evident than Ti?
It's still a shit idea.