Quote Originally Posted by strrrng
So, what is the consensus on this forum when describing people? because I've seen mbti and socionics used. personally, socionics seems superior to myers briggs, but I guess everything has its place.
that's one of our problems... being an internet forum there really isn't a good consensus. I'd say what's on the wikisocion can generally be accepted as the closest to consensus we have. The issue though is that there are those who mix and match, or even come up with their own theories, interpretations, and offshoots of socionics and you'll find that they can be the squeekiest wheels which I think causes alot of confusion to newcomers. If you can still find it there's a locked thread in anything goes that lists the "crackpots". The wording is a bit strong and meant to be taken in jest but generally if you read between the lines you'll get the picture. Be warned the thread turned into a major drama-explosion so you don't really have to read the whole the thing if you don't want to (but you'll be able to get an idea of how that part of "socionics" plays out and is represented here if you do)