cute alpha duality success!
michael reeves- ile
lily ki- sei
cute alpha duality success!
michael reeves- ile
lily ki- sei
The Hundred-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out of the Window and Disappeared
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hu...ppeared_(film)
The main character is obvious ILE. DCNH harmonizing - a lucky guy survives from sticky situations.
Last edited by The Reality Denialist; 02-25-2020 at 11:08 AM.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Guy on the right, Daniel Cormier ESE.
Monty Don. I'm typing him SEI because he seems Si-valuing and he loves his gardens.
He gets paid money to travel around Europe and walk through gardens, basically. Some have it so good.
Last edited by Rusal; 03-02-2020 at 02:33 AM.
Last edited by Tallmo; 03-02-2020 at 06:10 PM.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I don't share many values with ILE's, but one area where we do agree is that of democratic values. I find that ILE's have the most similar politics to me of any type. They have an arrow-like ability to cut right through BS and get to the rational heart of politics.
Here is an example of an ILE. Jonathan Metzl, author of Dying of Whiteness. A very impressive intellect. He seems to have a job that does not involve bartending, too. A remarkable guy.
https://www.dyingofwhiteness.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpoCq_dWTco
Isn't bartending very ethical type of job, lol? I can't imagine many logical people doing it at all. Bartending = good peep skillz and especially bad for types with zero sympathy skills like Fi PoLRs - yes it is that bad but some reason I can see Te bases better at it because they can appreciate sympathy and respond to it and actually you seem to do it a lot.
People do not go to bars to get roasted they go to bars to unload - which is the #1 reason I can not stand those environments - too much Fi.
Last edited by The Reality Denialist; 03-10-2020 at 06:57 PM.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
John Berryman: ILE (he's drunk here)
this guy is likely ILE-Ne (Jeffrey VanWingen)
Alan Sokal - LII or ILE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair
https://web.archive.org/web/20170519...inglefile.htmlThe Sokal affair, also called the Sokal hoax,[1] was a scholarly publishing sting perpetrated by Alan Sokal, a physics professor at New York University and University College London. In 1996, Sokal submitted an article to Social Text, an academic journal of postmodern cultural studies. The submission was an experiment to test the journal's intellectual rigor and, specifically, to investigate whether "a leading North American journal of cultural studies—whose editorial collective includes such luminaries as Fredric Jameson and Andrew Ross—[would] publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if (a) it sounded good and (b) it flattered the editors' ideological preconceptions".[2]
The article, "Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity",[3] was published in the Social Text spring/summer 1996 "Science Wars" issue. It proposed that quantum gravity is a social and linguistic construct. At that time, the journal did not practice academic peer review and it did not submit the article for outside expert review by a physicist.[4][5] Three weeks after its publication in May 1996, Sokal revealed in Lingua Franca that the article was a hoax.[2]
The hoax sparked a debate about the scholarly merit of commentary on the physical sciences by those in the humanities; the influence of postmodern philosophy on social disciplines in general; academic ethics, including whether Sokal was wrong to deceive the editors and readers of Social Text; and whether Social Text had exercised appropriate intellectual rigor.
But deep conceptual shifts within twentieth-century science have undermined this Cartesian-Newtonian metaphysics1; revisionist studies in the history and philosophy of science have cast further doubt on its credibility2; and, most recently, feminist and poststructuralist critiques have demystified the substantive content of mainstream Western scientific practice, revealing the ideology of domination concealed behind the façade of ``objectivity''.3 It has thus become increasingly apparent that physical ``reality'', no less than social ``reality'', is at bottom a social and linguistic construct; that scientific ``knowledge", far from being objective, reflects and encodes the dominant ideologies and power relations of the culture that produced it; that the truth claims of science are inherently theory-laden and self-referential; and consequently, that the discourse of the scientific community, for all its undeniable value, cannot assert a privileged epistemological status with respect to counter-hegemonic narratives emanating from dissident or marginalized communities. These themes can be traced, despite some differences of emphasis, in Aronowitz's analysis of the cultural fabric that produced quantum mechanics4; in Ross' discussion of oppositional discourses in post-quantum science5; in Irigaray's and Hayles' exegeses of gender encoding in fluid mechanics6; and in Harding's comprehensive critique of the gender ideology underlying the natural sciences in general and physics in particular.7
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Brian Jones - ILE
Clever ILE
Melissa Chen is likely ESE-Si 9w8
Michele Morrone ILE (8w7?) and Anna Maria Sieklucka - alpha SF
Last edited by lynn; 04-15-2020 at 07:20 PM.
Daniel Handler AKA Lemony Snicket is an LII
ترفرف كالأجنحة غير المنظورة حول رأسي
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Duke Ellington: ESE (edit: see post below)
Last edited by Dauphin; 04-21-2020 at 10:12 PM.
cute SEI artists
unrelated to these, the people i'm envious of the most in real life tend to be SEI, and a bit of SLIs. i am not sure why. if you like art or cutesy vlogs check these people out
Lilith Frey- SEI-Si
Fran Meneses-
NOMA- this one i'm not sure of but art style fits well enough lol
Arthur Rubinstein: ESE
Dr. Christiaan Barnard: ILE
Florian Schneider: LII
Louis Armstrong - ESE, perhaps?
I feel she could be SEI. But I don't really know. She seems lovely though. Maybe a little uncomfortable in that interview. Normally I would expect a SEI to have poorer command of speech and language. But there are always exceptions.
I am not a pro when it comes to typing celebrities.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
George Soros - ISFP - Dumas (The Moralist)