Anna Hutchison - ESE
Nina Paley - LII-Ti sx/sp (1w2?) - https://www.youtube.com/user/NinaPaley/videos
Karen McDougal - SEI-Fe sx/sp 4(w5?)
Last edited by silke; 04-23-2018 at 11:40 PM.
John Leguizamo, ILE.
His role as "Clown" in Spawn was great.
@Sol does not sound like it:
”Our beloved Tim was a seeker, a fragile artistic soul searching for answers to existential questions. An over-achieving perfectionist who travelled and worked hard at a pace that led to extreme stress. When he stopped touring, he wanted to find a balance in life to be happy and be able to do what he loved most – music.He really struggled with thoughts about Meaning, Life, Happiness. He could not go on any longer. He wanted to find peace.
Tim was not made for the business machine he found himself in; he was a sensitive guy who loved his fans but shunned the spotlight.
"artistic soul searching for answers to existential questions"
One of weak sides of behavior's analysis is the risk of the usage particular situations like they are prevaling or general ones, while on a behavior may influence a lot, it's often not very types specific. Also the context was to say good about, not to describe "as is". If you'd know the person IRL - you could to see him wider and notice that "artistic soul" has unnatural and supressed emotional behavior - what is norma for T types. INTJ version implies such result, and has the contradiction to the said too. Nonverbal is much more types specific, so deserves more of the trust.
I dont completely understand what youre saying because of your broken english but if you watch his documentary "true stories" its obvious that he's very different from the people he was working with in that industry, he gets called shy, genuine, and even naive. He got pushed around alot by people in that industry which happens if youre shy and naive and a nice person, with problems with assertion and thats what lead him to unhappiness. Unless youre saying that beta T can have problems with asserting themselves, being too naive and kind.
In the documentary he talks about jung and how he is an introvert so theres that.
Last edited by maniac; 04-27-2018 at 11:10 AM.
ESFj/INTj explosive sexual attraction
I'm feeling Andre 3000 (OutKast) as SEI.
Time spent with cats is time well spent.
Last edited by maniac; 05-05-2018 at 09:18 AM.
"I will bake you cookies. I will wash your clothes. No I am not a robot"
The only important is that you may use the examples to learn to type better.
Also you may use the impressions from examples to understand own type by IR. ESE seems are not the ones you like.
For the discussion of personal traits not related to Jung's types there are other threads and forums.
True.The only important is that you may use the examples to learn to type better.
I have no problems with ESE in the sense I like or dislike them. I have had difficulties before, but IE's in function position, reacting towards other people, reacting to my own reactions, those are not about like - dislike..they just are. What am I? Who is it that has the preferences? Drop the me, get back to the you. I know Fi has troubles with objectivity so its okay.Also you may use the impressions from examples to understand own type by IR. ESE seems are not the ones you like.
Random. PS I know Jung is the super hot topic around these parts these days, but it wasn't always so.For the discussion of personal traits not related to Jung's types there are other threads and forums.
PS I'm fine with her being ESE. To hyper focused, put together and genuinely caring to really be anything else. She has Fe eyes.
You recently had ILI in the profile, then IEE, soon later IEI, then removed the all. With this good understanding of the typology, which is not enough even to understand own type, you evaluate how correctly I type people.
In case the examples were random the typing matches were 1/16, but not ~15-20% for my typing method, my skills. And that is average numbers for today typing methods, I did not saw much better still.
IR test based on these examples would give random but not useful results. It gave results which are clearly not random, what I described in the test's theme. When yourself did this IR test - you got the results fitting not bad to EIE, the type which fits you better than other ones by the behavior analysis. There is no "pattern", but seems it has worked on you.
I get the results which fit good to the classical theory for years, what I see on IR with me and how people act in the life.
When you'll get the same - then you'll have the basis to trust to own typing skills to evaluate how good other ones type.
As you reject this evidence you are either lieing or do not understand yourself.
Use my blogger's list to understand how I type people, but not some examples in the threads. If you trust to own typing skills [in case at least you type people for more than a year since became assured in own type and notice the good correctness of the theory, as only with correct types you'll not get much of bs], you may calculate the % you agree with my types. In other case you have no reasonalbe basis to doubt in what I do.
While your personal sympathies not related to concrete types - is not what this theme is about at all.
@Sol youre like socionics ******
timber is saying that none of the people you post (regardless of type) has any personality
or.. i picked one or two off each type that seemed attractive and decent.There is no "pattern", but seems it has worked on you.
apparently he isfp not istp