a
a
Last edited by olduser; 10-12-2020 at 05:43 PM.
asd
i like your under the radar untypeability, sir. i have a feeling this fucking show is never going to end. i have an idea.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Scarlett, you think I'm LSI too. Maybe every good looking cool male who kicks ass is an LSI
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
@ the vid
You look much younger than before. Not much typewise. No speaking?
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Still Alpha NT; LII is most likely, IMO.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Leaning this way also.Originally Posted by Gilly
Originally Posted by Logos
Retired from posting and drawing Social Security. E-mail or PM to contact.
I pity your souls
+1!!!Originally Posted by Elro
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Mmm... CUTe. That's your type. I'm 100% sure.
INTp
sx/sp
Dude, you look so serious! Flash us a smile
Very nice looking young man. I say either ISTp or INTp, but I still wouldn't rule out ESTj.
See how almost everyone wants you in their quadra?
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Delta ST probably
Heathie P Heathie P is an
ISTp ISTp
or ESTj
(actually ESTj is more likely but it just doesnt rhyme as well)
LIIs seem much more merry and conducive to Fe than heath.
Where is his Ne?
Generally speaking he comes off in a serious way like I do, so I can see delta ST. He seems more 'introverted' in terms of his stance on life though - so I would lean towards dominant. That said I do not know much about him at all.
His first video had him laughing a lot and I think that is why people see LII. If he does a more real life one instead of laughing or being a statue, perhaps that would reveal more.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
I was going mostly from VI (which seemed the purpose of this thread) - he reminds me uncannily of a friend I believe to be LII. That said, I could easily see him as Delta ST, too. I don't think he's serious (little s) all the time (see even his link to the video), but I don't think delta STs are necessarily serious all the time either, so it could work.
Originally Posted by Logos
Retired from posting and drawing Social Security. E-mail or PM to contact.
I pity your souls
I don't see heath as being serious (small s), really...almost all of his posts have smacks of humor, or at least sarcasm. He'd the David Byrne type of LII, I think. Tell me you can't see a little heath here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dE-mxVxFXLg
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I think a lot of the time, people can be mistaken for their benefactor or their illusionary, and that people can type themselves as their benefator.Originally Posted by Elro
Not working for me.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Would you ever do a skit like that one, heath?
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
lolOriginally Posted by heath
I love heath, I do. His posts display a well-tuned sense of wry irony. I still think INTj is most likely. Something about Delta ST seems rather off-the-mark to me. That's all I'm willing to say unless I actually meet the guy.
ISFj
ESFp-Fi sub
6w7 sx/so/sp
no way.Originally Posted by liveandletlive
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Actually, the way I see Ne in ESTjs is that they really are quite sharp and witty verbally. They also seem to find things that are creative amusing. ISTj are witty too but lack imagination in their insults.Originally Posted by Courage
I agree he's serious and i think he wayyyyy prefers Fi because of many times i can remember when he has talked disapprovingly of "slutty" behavior. That's all im saying!
pfft. i don't dissapprove of much in other people's behaviour. i don't like haughty intellectuals. i consider myself a studied, scientific person and the only thing that can possibly be borne from that is benevolence. I have been harsh in the past but i think that was consequence of establishing an identity. i knew who i wanted to be, and possible what i thought but when that thought of myself wavered i was not polite, and lashed out against people on the internet(embarassing.). now i am more stable and settled about who i am as a person and this lends to an even temperament.
baby: i like you. think it is curious that i have never met anyone like you in person.
i suggest everyone stop frequenting this board.
asd
i wonder. i don't know, heathie. i think we could be similar types pretty often and i think our understanding is similar. you also share some sort of "SDF:LKJ! FAKE! FAKE! WASTEFUL! GETTING BY ON HER LOOKS ALONE!" thing. i had a pretty long argument pro-INTj set out here and then i erased it. i mean i could do the same thing for ISTp but i don't think it would be any more convincing.
i hate socionics.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
i am likely intj. i think the description at socionix.com of youth intj describes me well. i'm not really a nerd, but i love to study the natural world. i also try my best at athletics and really love to dance and play music.
intj is not necessarily 'the nerd' stereotype. i think my social persona could even be percieved by some as 'cool.' I have a good time, but my mind rests in whatever i am studying.
asd
does this mean we don't get anymore videos?
wait, so ESFps couldn't be accused of such?Originally Posted by Ms. Kensington
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
-Which socionix descriptions are you referring to specifically?Originally Posted by heath
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Originally Posted by heath
that can be ISTp too. god this is pointless.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
the referrents of slutty differ here.. but i've talked to you about this before. And, they would be the same things that I feel you and I clash on too. Hear that everyone? I think Implied is Fi.Originally Posted by implied
i agree. that is why i want to meet a few of you. i think it could even be fun.Originally Posted by implied
i don't dissapprove of sluts. i have actually been thinking of this lately because it's something that has occured with my group of friends. 4 or 5 of them have all hooked up with one girl, not simeltaneously mind you, but they all have. i realized this is kind of what sluts do(all of this just gave me a better understand of exactly what a slut is, because what is on tv and the insult that flies around doesn't really give info on what a slut is, and i lack all street smarts to have an intuitive understanding of such a thing). but i don't pity the girl or look down on her. i remember thinking, "that's her thing." i don't think about her deep-rooted emotional problems, or what it really all means. she is doing what she wants to do.
a good topic, sluts is. any more?
asd
i agree that if it's what they want to do and it's done safely. i don't know, heathie, i had a really good friend who was an escort for money for a long time and i wasn't exactly bothered by it as long as it was done safely, the only thing that bothered me is that it probably did eventually put her through some emotional pain! she was actually relatively safe about it.
it's hard to say because you can talk about slutty behavior like this but i can't ever really imagine my friend as a "slut," nor would i call her that. she's switched up and decided to go to art school and she's doing well. i'm glad she's out of it, but i don't think i would have endorsed it.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
http://forum.socionix.com/index.php?showtopic=136Men of this type rarely are jealous. Usually they be proud by their friends and are are completely contented, if their woman pleases herself not only by them, but also by others.
I could never ever tolerate that - this is from the INTj profile on the soocionix site
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
i think all that means is that they don't want to own their girlfriends. i'd love to have a charming girlfriend who everyone liked, and flirted with.
asd
I can certainly understand the not judging sluts thing but could INTjs really be content with their partner essentially having sex with other people?
Socionics: XNFx
MBTI: INFJ
i've always thought of alpha as the taboo free quadra
I am not a slut.
(Heath is the only person here who can literally make me cackle out loud, for what it's worth).