ugh people keep getting engaged around me...
ugh people keep getting engaged around me...
My sister is 32, unmarried, ESTp, and proud of it.
Most of her friends from h.s. and college have long since gotten married though. She obviously likes her independence and freedom.
check off an ENTj and ISFj for "married" though (both 28). :wink:
Te-INTp/ILI, my wife: Fi-ISFj/ESI, with laser beam death rays for ESTp/SLEs, lol
16 years of bliss in an Activity relationship
I've been married twice so far.
INFp and have been married twice. A palm reader said the second time would be the longest and end in husband's death and that I would married one more time after that. First marriage at at 28 lasted four years, five if you count the year it took to convince him to sign the divorce. Second marriage at 42 and six years so far so I have beat my first record.
<--- Me pouring out all my love on you!
Some days its just not worth chewing through the restraints.
I married my first husband two months after I graduated high school. We were married almost 2 years before separating. I think it was over a year before we were actually divorced though, because I was just too lazy to fill out the paperwork. I married my current husband 3 years ago in March. We'll likely be done by this spring. I'll probably marry again years from now, when I'm in a place in my life where I can make that kind of decision (aka- healthy), and then that relationship should be a life time one. We'll see what happens, though. There's always that whole polygomy idea. :wink:
Goin against the grain again....I've been married 11 years so far and only once. Didn't get married till I was 30, though, would never have been ready for it before then (not that others can't be ready at younger ages!).
Marriage is overrated.
Entp
ILE
Married 7 years so far and only the one time. I got married when I was 28.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Honestly, I'm rather against the whole concept of marriage. I don't see how obligation is EVER a good thing in a relationship. Why do you need me to PROMISE I'll love you until I DIE?! Sheesh!
The first time I was just an idiot. The second time I recognized that marrying is merely registering your relationship with the government.
Thats a very technical way of looking at it. You could also say that marage is a commitement to your partner when your sure you want to be with them forever, that you'll go through life together no matter what. And that may sound sappy, but thats the other way of looking at it. It's also very important in the christian religion because your not supposed to have kids until you get married under the ten commandments.marrying is merely registering your relationship with the government.
Yah.... I'm sorta not into the whole commitement thing much.... so it would take quite a while before I decided I was going to mary somebody... like.... a long time.
^^ SLE.
I'm very serious with when get married and stick to your husband/wife till you die thing if I do want to get married. But right now I don't want to get married nor get a boyfriend, I like the freedom .
What crazy is some people that are my age (18), are dating right now planned to get married after high school graduation.
ISFP, SEI
Hi. I'm Baby. I'm INFp, and to marry me you must:
- be perfect in every way
- be poetic
- have amazing eyes
- make me laugh
- love music
- be cuddly
- enjoy my complete and devoted adoration
- understand me even if I say the complete opposite of what I mean
- find me impressive, charming, and otherwise adore me
- make love like an underfed Roman gladiator
- feed me
- let me hold you for long stretches at a time
- leave me alone for at least 10 of the 24 hours of the day
- welcome my clinginess
... at this rate, I'll never get married.
i think its the first rule.
the others are doable
Originally Posted by Baby
Don't they all fall under the first rule though? :wink:
So you think like every person ever?Originally Posted by Baby
So they also need to be an IEI?- be poetic
I think it's harder to find a woman WITHOUT amazing eyes.- have amazing eyes
*Rocky jiggles some keys until Baby starts laughing*- make me laugh
:wink:
Ni dominant.- love music
Se dual-seeking?- be cuddly
Fe creative function.- enjoy my complete and devoted adoration
Fe creative function.- understand me even if I say the complete opposite of what I mean
Fe creative function.- find me impressive, charming, and otherwise adore me
Se dual-seeking.- make love like an underfed Roman gladiator
Se dual-seeking.- feed me
ahh... introversion....- let me hold you for long stretches at a time
... and again!- leave me alone for at least 10 of the 24 hours of the day
Fe.- welcome my clinginess
--- Baby, after looking through this, I don't think it is physically possible for one of these women to exsist.
Aw... you think so? She must exist! Somewhere out there she's waiting! I must travel the world until I find her!Originally Posted by Rocky
Or else, her foot must fit this shoe:
That all sounds pretty damn appealing I gotta say.Hi. I'm Baby. I'm INFp, and to marry me you must:
- be perfect in every way
- be poetic
- have amazing eyes
- make me laugh
- love music
- be cuddly
- enjoy my complete and devoted adoration
- understand me even if I say the complete opposite of what I mean
- find me impressive, charming, and otherwise adore me
- make love like an underfed Roman gladiator
- feed me
- let me hold you for long stretches at a time
- leave me alone for at least 10 of the 24 hours of the day
- welcome my clinginess
... at this rate, I'll never get married.
I remember under MBTI statistics at least, the INFP was the lowest when it comes to marraige statistic rates. Fun stuff.
for some reason that made me laugh. Good luck finding cinderella .Originally Posted by Baby
ISFP, SEI
"Hi. I'm Baby. I'm INFp, and to marry me you must:
- be perfect in every way
- be poetic
- have amazing eyes
- make me laugh
- love music
- be cuddly
- enjoy my complete and devoted adoration
- understand me even if I say the complete opposite of what I mean
- find me impressive, charming, and otherwise adore me
- make love like an underfed Roman gladiator
- feed me
- let me hold you for long stretches at a time
- leave me alone for at least 10 of the 24 hours of the day
- welcome my clinginess "
In other words, you'll only marry other INFps.
"To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"
"Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."
WARNING: MBTI and may be unreliable.
Highest Percentage Married
(From highest to lowest)
ESFJ (53%)
ISTJ (51%)
ENTJ (51%)
ESTJ (50%)
ISFJ (48%)
INTJ (44%)
ISTP (43%)
ENFJ (40%)
ISFP (38%)
INFJ (37%)
ENTP (37%)
ENFP (36%)
INTP (35%)
ESFP (34%)
ESTP (31%)
INFP (30%)
http://www.personalitypage.com/demographics.html
I had a list like that once, except mine took up the front and back of a college ruled paper. I found that the next guy I fell for, Josh, didn't meet up to a lot of my requirements. It didn't matter though. The important ones were there and the rest... well, I sorta saw him as an exception to the rules. And it was great for a while, too.
You know... I really wish theyre were socionics statistics like MBTI...
On a side note....Originally Posted by Baby
I believe I am all of those except the first and the last...
Hmmm. That's interesting. Why would p types have lower frequency of marriage?Originally Posted by Rocky
Just can't make that committment, I spose . . .
Entp
ILE
Maybe those types thought themselves to be Ps because of their supposed self-image of noncommitment?
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
Hi. I'm INTp and to marry me you must:
-live at least one country away (or in this case state)
-Not touch me that much
- Have an IQ of at least 1,000
-Being that you would have to live in another country you would have to come and see me at least five times a year.
-Not be obsessed with monogamy.
-Have amazing aesthetic taste
-The ability to have fun verbal confrontations
Oh yeah. There are many more.
Edit: Most importantly you must have a very high ping rate.
My prerequisites:
1. You must be female and somewhat attractive.
2. ...?
Hmm, I guess that's it.
:wink:
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
Shit... that's me!Originally Posted by Sycophant
You're WAY too fussy, Cone.Originally Posted by Cone
I know. I seriously doubt ANYONE could live up to my prerequisites.
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
lets fuck!Originally Posted by Rocky
@Steve: Your avatar looks like you don't have a shirt on? Are you naked?
<--- Me pouring out all my love on you!
Some days its just not worth chewing through the restraints.
Why?????Originally Posted by Steve
<--- Me pouring out all my love on you!
Some days its just not worth chewing through the restraints.
I always thought Columbian drug dealers wore white fancy suits? Guess I watch too much TV.Originally Posted by Steve
<--- Me pouring out all my love on you!
Some days its just not worth chewing through the restraints.
The last one from this topic area that I read stated that the 2 ENJ's married much later than the rest which makes sense as well. I can full well see an ENJ rejecting a relationship because they can foresee (whether their foresight is accurate or not is another discussion...) the possibility of failure.Originally Posted by Rocky
Cone: I liked your self-image comment. It is a definite possibility and one of the many things to be considered when looking at temperament.
Rocky: Why the warning statement? Both Socionics and MBTI may have areas that are totally unreliable. Showing a specific bias and being narrow is of really poor scientific taste. Even if it is about subjective science (my pet name for the social sciences lol).
Becuase, those were just based off of people who took on-line tests, and I really don't trust on-line tests.Rocky: Why the warning statement? Both Socionics and MBTI may have areas that are totally unreliable. Showing a specific bias and being narrow is of really poor scientific taste. Even if it is about subjective science (my pet name for the social sciences lol).