Quote Originally Posted by Pinocchio View Post
- please tell me everything you know and think of about this dichotomy - I'm looking for any relevant observations anyone can provide;
- don't you think SLE and SLI are rather Tactical and IEI and IEE Strategic in behaviour? Ignore Reinin's functional definition of this dichotomy, but use descriptions or observations...

For the second point, I noticed this: when given an advice, or alternative directions, Strategic types strongly tend to ignore adopting them for the moment, although they keep them in mind for a very long time and, having visible but delayed effects on them, in many cases years (varied situations). But Tacticals usually investigate the alternatives on the spot, dismissing and forgetting them if not interesting. Yes, they may come back over the time, but as rediscoveries.
I don't know much about the dichotomy. I know about as much as what I put into that post. Strategic types have specific long term goals in mind without much focus on exactly how to get there. Tactical types know how they are and what they can do, but don't focus as much on where that will bring them.

Strategic types have inert sensing and contact intuition.
Tactical types have inert intuition and contact sensing.

This is the reasoning I came up with.

NJs are strategic because they use their future focus as means to reach rational goals. (future focused judgment)

SJs are tactical because they use their present focus as means to their rational values. (present focused judgment)

SPs are strategic because they have clear material wants and needs in mind. (material goals)

NPs are tactical because they know what they are capable of and consequences of actions, but without any necessary direction. (abilities, predictions)