-
Ti centric
Process/Result has to do with the amount of investment the person puts into his/her activities. Process types like to give things "their all", they don't carefully dose their energy but unleash it fully upon what they're doing. Result types are more likely to hold back until a worthwhile oppurtunity arises, only to invest in it as much as they need to.
Process types find it more important to understand everything they do before they do it. Result types have an easier time acting on deficient knowledge. This is because the Accepting function of the Result type is the less general, less understanding-based of the two (- instead of +).
Process/Result is linked to clubs and temperaments... Result NTj types seem to secundarily behave like Process STj types at times, meaning they are mentally "lazy" and quick to decide but physically/practically arduous despite that they spend more time in that "mentally readied" state. Opposite goes for Process NTp types...
The words I like to use for Process/Result are:
Process: active, obstacle minded
Result: readied, oppurtunity minded
Strategy/Tactics is one of the large cycle reinin dichotomies that every type shares with his/her conflictor. If these dichotomies are real, there would be a huge number of characteristics one could identify as being shared between conflictors. I find this dubious, and am as such sceptical of these dichotomies.
Strategy/Tactics itself denotes the property that Accepting S and Creating N on one hand and Accepting N and Creating S on the other have in common.
On top of this, there are a lot of other things in the system that have a connotation of Strategy/Tactics, N/S being the most notable of these.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules