Originally Posted by
Metaphor
Well, this cognition seems to have a willingness of being interested to this kind of stuff more since they prefer to understand the mechanism of process according to the available possibilities, this is something that Casual thinker severely lacks since they really don't prefer to complicate an already complicated perception according to them, and since Dialectical thinker is a negativist, they are prone to doubt these interpretations and therefore trying to understand these styles as they have a tendency to have these styles to be more "transparent" or in other words, fleshed out from its current raw and generalized concept, the one which made by Gulenko. Also, I'm not quite sure about what you really mean by 'impressionable in some ways here', but I think that they are mostly drawn by correlations and examples at most.