Elzo's Socionics Test

[Gilly]

I'm sorry, but the Reinin Dichotomies just cannot possibly be tested for in such a straightforward manner.

i think everyone will find at least a couple they can confidently choose. it's all a matter of refining to a degree when most can make confident choices on most questions.

No, you don't get it. I don't think people are fully aware of the ways in which a lot of the Reinin Dichotomies operate "mentally." I think it's bullshit if someone can distinguish between Static and Dynamic in themselves. Even on a functional level, it just doesn't make sense for people to be that objective and observant about how their internal thought processes operate when they're deliberately trying to observe them. It's just crap. It doesn't fucking happen. People may arbirtrarily identify with one or two because of life experience or world-view or some shit, but I highly doubt that anyone can go down a list of Reinin Dichotomies and accurately assess how each definition plays a part in their metabolism of information. No way.

[Creepy-bg]

I'm sorry, but the Reinin Dichotomies just cannot possibly be tested for in such a straightforward manner.

i think everyone will find at least a couple they can confidently choose. it's all a matter of refining to a degree when most can make confident choices on most questions.

No, you don't get it. I don't think people are fully aware of the ways in which a lot of the Reinin Dichotomies operate "mentally." I think it's bullshit if someone can distinguish between Static and Dynamic in themselves. Even on a functional level, it just doesn't make sense for people to be that objective and observant about how their internal thought processes operate when they're deliberately trying to observe them. It's just crap. It doesn't fucking happen. People may arbirtrarily identify with one or two because of life experience or world-view or some shit, but I highly doubt that anyone can go down a list of Reinin Dichotomies and accurately assess how each definition plays a part in their metabolism of information. No way.

+3

[Gilly]

I perceive events in an episodic manner — discrete states rather than continuous changes.

This might be like a series of photographs telling a story (I'm not sure if the 'photographs' necessarily need to be in sequence?)

I perceive events in a continuous sequences — continuous changes rather than discrete states.

This might be more like a film telling a story .

i think dynamic is very good if you can imagine a movie with your eyes closed of anything moving, like people or whatever. statics i think are unable to do that or no?

Oh what a crock of shit. Imagining moving pictures with your eyes closed is related to type? Get the fuck out. Cut this fakery already; you're not fooling anyone with a penny's worth of Socionics knowledge.

[liveandletlive]

it said i was 11 ENTp... interesting...

[Khamelion]

The probability of you being each type (out of 15):
ENTp: 7
ISFp: 7
INTj: 4
ESFj: 6
ESTp: 6
INFp: 4
ISTj: 7
ENFj: 7
ESFp: 11
INTp: 5
ISFj: 6
ENTj: 6
ENFp: 6
ISTp: 6
INFj: 5
ESTj: 3

[Kim]

* ENTp: 6
* ISFp: 8
* INTj: 8
* ESFj: 8
* ESTp: 5
* INFp: 9
* ISTj: 3
* ENFj: 5
* ESFp: 7
* INTp: 5
* ISFj: 3
* ENTj: 7
* ENFp: 6
* ISTp: 6
* INFj: 6
* ESTj: 4

[Kim]

Actually, it does not fit me at all. That kind of Si (with Fe) is almost intimidating to me. When
When I throw a dinner party, for example, I feel immensely pressured.

[Kim]

what about this one? http://socioniko.net/en/1.1.types/index.html

What one now?

[Creepy-bg]

@ Kim:

* INFp: 9 9
* ISFp: 8 8 x
* INTj: 8 8 x
* ESFj: 8 8
* ESFp: 7 7
* ENTj: 7 7
* ENTp: 6 6
* ENFp: 6 6
* ISTp: 6 6
* INFj: 6 6
* ESTp: 5 5
* ENFj: 5 5
* INTp: 5 5 x
* ESTj: 4 4
* ISTj: 3 3
* ISFj: 3 3 x

the ones with stars are more or less well balanced in terms of quasi identical relations. does ISFp profile fit you well?

they all have stars

[Kim]

what about this one? http://socioniko.net/en/1.1.types/index.html

Some of it I relate to, but I am not that restrained and buttoned-up. And I don't live in the
here and now (which I find a bit unfortunate).

[Creepy-bg]

Kim is ENFp... I'm not entirely sure what I am but I am sure that she gives me the same vibe I get from other ENFps.

[Kim]

right... which profiles fit you most, like name a few.

FWIW, just yesterday I asked two people on here what my second most likely type is and they both said ESFp.
Both said definitely Fi>Fe, Te>Ti and lots of Ne as well as EP temperament.

If it helps for the test. :wink:

[Hugo]

the ones with stars are more or less well balanced in terms of quasi identical relations.

[Hugo]

Yeah, I know, but I'm not sure I agree with you. Actually, I'm not sure I understand what you mean.

[Creepy-bg]

* ENTp: 6
* ISFp: 8
* INTj: 10
* ESFj: 8
* ESTp: 4
* INFp: 6
* ISTj: 8
* ENFj: 6
* ESFp: 7
* INTp: 7
* ISFj: 7
* ENTj: 3
* ENFp: 7
* ISTp: 3
* INFj: 7
* ESTj: 7


interresting... not impossible

[Creepy-bg]

if you care to compare here's my results from the Russians 200 question test (which isn't on the internets anymore)



I'm not so sure about ISTj... doesn't seem likely from my perspective. But INTj is (when you throw the stereotypes out the window)

FWIW most people here seem to think I'm ISFp

[Creepy-bg]

link me one you think is good and I'll tell ya

[Subteigh]

Bloody hell, that's nice to look at !

[Creepy-bg]

not as nice as this...

[Creepy-bg]

that translation reads like it was done by monkeys.

no... that's not me at all.

[jessica129]

ENTp: 6
ISFp: 6
INTj: 11
ESFj: 3
ESTp: 8
INFp: 8
ISTj: 5
ENFj: 5
ESFp: 5
INTp: 5
ISFj: 6
ENTj: 6
ENFp: 7
ISTp: 7
INFj: 8
ESTj: 8

lol.....no. That's comical.

[Creepy-bg]

ENTp: 6
ISFp: 6
INTj: 11
ESFj: 3
ESTp: 8
INFp: 8
ISTj: 5
ENFj: 5
ESFp: 5
INTp: 5
ISFj: 6
ENTj: 6
ENFp: 7
ISTp: 7
INFj: 8
ESTj: 8

lol.....no. That's comical.

I always knew it

[jessica129]

? So i am istp? Confused.
I had actually typed many times as INTJ back in the day. Well actually, i think i've typed as every single type at least once. I think i'm just a freak

[jessica129]

I think there's about a 1% chance of that. So yeah, so far i've been typed ISTP, ISTJ, INTP, INTJ, INFP, ISFJ and ESTP. Interesting.

[Ezra]

What you need to do is cut the crap and get to the heart of it.

From your many results, you're an ISTP. You have more I than E results, more Ss than Ns, more Ts than Fs and more Ps than Js.

That doesn't mean you're a SEI though. Spend some time looking at the functions. There's no way you could possibly have Si, Ti, Ni, Fi and Se as all possible leading functions. Now, it's most likely you're an Introvert. So look at the four initial aforementioned functions, and decide which is closest to you. Use wikisocion - best source. There's a bit on socionics.us too.

[jessica129]

Http://wikisocion.org

That was a really good description, funny how I never knew that site even existed, haha. All things aside, I AM ISTP. I'm not taking one more test or analyzing anything anymore.

[normal]

I has problems to decide the answer, anyway, here's my result

The probability of you being each type (out of 15):
ENTp: 4
ISFp: 9
INTj: 6
ESFj: 7
ESTp: 6
INFp: 9
ISTj: 8
ENFj: 7
ESFp: 5
INTp: 8
ISFj: 7
ENTj: 6
ENFp: 9
ISTp: 6
INFj: 3
ESTj: 4

[Park]

The probability of you being each type (out of 15):

* ENTp: 7
* ISFp: 6
* INTj: 6
* ESFj: 5
* ESTp: 4
* INFp: 5
* ISTj: 3
* ENFj: 4
* ESFp: 4
* INTp: 3
* ISFj: 5
* ENTj: 4
* ENFp: 1
* ISTp: 6
* INFj: 6
* ESTj: 3

[Joy]

The probability of you being each type (out of 15):

* ENTp: 4
* ISFp: 5
* INTj: 4
* ESFj: 5
* ESTp: 6
* INFp: 5
* ISTj: 2
* ENFj: 5
* ESFp: 4
* INTp: 7
* ISFj: 4
* ENTj: 7
* ENFp: 2
* ISTp: 3
* INFj: 6
* ESTj: 3

[Shazaam]

To me this isn't all that helpful. It's just deciding if you're a rational, 'here and now' physically-oriented person or if you're a magical daydreamy emo INFp wanting some big dick to penetrate you. As always, what describes me best is in bold.

I am mostly involved in the world around me.
I am mostly involved in my own thoughts and feelings.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.


I am mostly aware of the here and now, my physical surroundings and its details.
I am mostly aware of future possibilities, abstract meaning, ideas and concepts.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options. ((neither, really - I'm more focused on the present and the past equally. Not so much with the future...))


I am focused on the demands of the material world on myself and others.
I am focused on people, their relationships, feelings and emotions.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.


I simply react to changes in a situation.
I use my rational judgment before acting upon changes in a situation.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.


I perceive events in an episodic manner — discrete states rather than continuous changes.
I perceive events in a continuous sequences — continuous changes rather than discrete states.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.


I tend to use interrogative intonations — much of what I say sounds like a question.
I am inclined to speak in a declarative manner — even my questions may sound like statements.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.


I am focused on the 'positive' aspects of a situation: what has gone right and could go right, what is correct and plentiful.
I am focused on the 'negative' aspects of a situation: what has gone wrong and could go wrong, what is missing or deficient.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.


I focus on the actions to be performed, with the goal unsettled.
I focus on the goal to reach, with the actions to get there unsettled.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.


I tend to minimize the emotional elements of interaction, preferring to focus on the 'business' elements.
I tend to concentrate foremost on the emotional background of interaction, with 'business' a secondary concern.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.


I feel myself 'immersed' in a process, and therefore have a difficult time multitasking.
I feel myself on the 'outside' of a process, and thus easily multitask.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.


To me, resources are 'sacred', but ideas are freely shared and manipulated.
To me, ideas are 'sacred', but resources are freely shared and manipulated.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.


I am inclined to solve problems by primarily using that information which is 'at hand'. Accordingly, my solutions are likely to be particular to that situation.
I am inclined to solve problems by primarily using that information which I possess through knowledge and experience. Accordingly, my solutions are likely to be of a general nature.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.


My natural state is relaxed. I would prefer a romantic relationship in which one partner provides physical comfort, material needs and daily practical help to the other partner.
My natural state is readiness. I would prefer a romantic relationship containing an element of competition in which one partner feels a sense of awe for the other ("tougher") partner.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.


I am good at noticing the emotional background and perceiving the emotional aspect (particularly 'fun') separate from the activity.
I am bad at noticing the emotional background and do not separate the emotional aspect (particularly 'fun') from the activity.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.


I perceive myself and others primarily through individual qualities.
I perceive myself and others primarily through the groups they belong to.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

[Joy]

I am mostly involved in the world around me.
I am mostly involved in my own thoughts and feelings.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

I am mostly aware of the here and now, my physical surroundings and its details.
I am mostly aware of future possibilities, abstract meaning, ideas and concepts.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

I am focused on the demands of the material world on myself and others.
I am focused on people, their relationships, feelings and emotions.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

I simply react to changes in a situation.
I use my rational judgment before acting upon changes in a situation.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

I perceive events in an episodic manner — discrete states rather than continuous changes.
I perceive events in a continuous sequences — continuous changes rather than discrete states.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

I tend to use interrogative intonations — much of what I say sounds like a question.
I am inclined to speak in a declarative manner — even my questions may sound like statements.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

I am focused on the 'positive' aspects of a situation: what has gone right and could go right, what is correct and plentiful.
I am focused on the 'negative' aspects of a situation: what has gone wrong and could go wrong, what is missing or deficient.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

I focus on the actions to be performed, with the goal unsettled.
I focus on the goal to reach, with the actions to get there unsettled.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

I tend to minimize the emotional elements of interaction, preferring to focus on the 'business' elements.
I tend to concentrate foremost on the emotional background of interaction, with 'business' a secondary concern.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

I feel myself 'immersed' in a process, and therefore have a difficult time multitasking.
I feel myself on the 'outside' of a process, and thus easily multitask.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

To me, resources are 'sacred', but ideas are freely shared and manipulated.
To me, ideas are 'sacred', but resources are freely shared and manipulated.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

I am inclined to solve problems by primarily using that information which is 'at hand'. Accordingly, my solutions are likely to be particular to that situation.
I am inclined to solve problems by primarily using that information which I possess through knowledge and experience. Accordingly, my solutions are likely to be of a general nature.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

My natural state is relaxed. I would prefer a romantic relationship in which one partner provides physical comfort, material needs and daily practical help to the other partner.
My natural state is readiness. I would prefer a romantic relationship containing an element of competition in which one partner feels a sense of awe for the other ("tougher") partner. (though on second thought, I would have chosen the neutral option here because the second part of this option pisses me off)
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

I am good at noticing the emotional background and perceiving the emotional aspect (particularly 'fun') separate from the activity.
I am bad at noticing the emotional background and do not separate the emotional aspect (particularly 'fun') from the activity.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

I perceive myself and others primarily through individual qualities.
I perceive myself and others primarily through the groups they belong to.
I find it difficult to select one of the above options.

[Joy]

@ Joy: I perceive events in a continuous sequences — continuous changes rather than discrete states.

how the hell were you able to anser that?

This is the primary way I'm different from many of those around me. I wouldn't use the word "sequences" or "discrete" though. I can't really explain it properly. At least not right now.

To me, resources are 'sacred', but ideas are freely shared and manipulated.

and this?

Well, I'm stingy with my resources (though I wouldn't call them sacred), but my ideas change all the time. I don't think the those who feel the opposite would refuse to tell others their ideas though.

[Joy]

It's Resource protecting vs. Interest protecting.