I have trouble associating this look with Fe PoLR (or Gamma in general):
Alpha NT. I'd lean INTj. ENTp is possible, but he just seems more like an IJ temperament to me.
I have trouble associating this look with Fe PoLR (or Gamma in general):
Alpha NT. I'd lean INTj. ENTp is possible, but he just seems more like an IJ temperament to me.
JRiddy
—————King of Socionics—————
Ne-ENTp 7w8 sx/so
Yup, LII.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Noam Chomsky - William F. Buckley debate from 1969 on Buckley's show: Firing Line
Chomsky and Alan Dershowitz debate Israel/Palestine issue (14 parts)
(Off topic: The very beginning of the first video before the debate - the author of "On Bullshit" - he seems like a pretty interesting guy lol, and some really surreal conversations and videos about the book on YouTube)
Like this for instance:
![]()
Last edited by tereg; 11-19-2008 at 11:55 PM.
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
fwiw, I do not see him as an ethical type at all.
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
I am willing to consider EII, but personally I still think LII is most likely. I don't see the consideration of "moral obstacles" as necessarily indication of his being an ethical type, but nonetheless it seems like the only realistic alternative to LII from where I stand, so it's worth thinking about, at least.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
i think ILE. He likes to explain ideas and they are generally broad and non-specific in the political work i've read. I think an LII would have a much more bookish rational approach. His approach to provide infrmation is just to speak and give his ideas. he reminds me of me for some reaosn.
asd
By the way, the most bookish people are usually gamma SF. There are two kinds of bookish people: BP who understand what they talk about and people who don't...
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp![]()
DCNH: Dominant![]()
--> perhaps Normalizing
![]()
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Of course, he is NT for sure!
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp![]()
DCNH: Dominant![]()
--> perhaps Normalizing
![]()
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Ugh. Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean when you say "bookish" - but then again, maybe I'm not alone. So could you please be more specific? 'Cause I'm extremely bookish, and I got plenty of bookish pals, and I don't think half of us are gamma SF. I'm Delta ST, and most of the rest of 'em are N types at the least.
And after reading Chomsky, I also have a hard time seeing him as an ethical type. Reminds me of how badly I try to rationalize emotions at times.
SLIOriginally Posted by Charles Bukowski
Hi. FMOPV there are two types of bookish people:
Bookish person #1: a person who has a certain knowledge about some stuff and is always trying to explain people things about it in a complicated way. The real objective of these low self esteem FUCKERS is to bore people and at the same time, prevent them from understanding what he's saying to remain as the "most intelligent person around here". This makes unhappy fuckers feel smug.
Bookish person #2: stupid lowIQ asshole who is unable to create any new information/knowledge, and, because of that, feels frustrated. To compensate this, he reads about subjects and then speaks VERY LOUD about it , without even change any word of his speech, to fake he is very intelligent.
Bookish type #3: a mix of these two CABRONES
Intelligent people explains things in a simple way and people tend to understand them
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp![]()
DCNH: Dominant![]()
--> perhaps Normalizing
![]()
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.