View Poll Results: Noam Chomsky's type?

Voters
16. You may not vote on this poll
  • ILE (ENTp)

    1 6.25%
  • SEI (ISFp)

    0 0%
  • ESE (ESFj)

    0 0%
  • LII (INTj)

    12 75.00%
  • SLE (ESTp)

    0 0%
  • IEI (INFp)

    1 6.25%
  • EIE (ENFj)

    0 0%
  • LSI (ISTj)

    0 0%
  • SEE (ESFp)

    0 0%
  • ILI (INTp)

    1 6.25%
  • LIE (ENTj)

    0 0%
  • ESI (ISFj)

    0 0%
  • IEE (ENFp)

    0 0%
  • SLI (ISTp)

    0 0%
  • LSE (ESTj)

    0 0%
  • EII (INFj)

    1 6.25%
Results 1 to 40 of 78

Thread: Noam Chomsky

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    JRiddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Indian Territory
    TIM
    Ne-ENTp 7w8 sx/so
    Posts
    838
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have trouble associating this look with Fe PoLR (or Gamma in general):





    Alpha NT. I'd lean INTj. ENTp is possible, but he just seems more like an IJ temperament to me.

    JRiddy
    —————King of Socionics—————

    Ne-ENTp 7w8 sx/so

  2. #2
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,685
    Mentioned
    95 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yup, LII.
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  3. #3
    tereg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    TIM
    EII/INFj
    Posts
    4,680
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Noam Chomsky - William F. Buckley debate from 1969 on Buckley's show: Firing Line




    Chomsky and Alan Dershowitz debate Israel/Palestine issue (14 parts)



    (Off topic: The very beginning of the first video before the debate - the author of "On Bullshit" - he seems like a pretty interesting guy lol, and some really surreal conversations and videos about the book on YouTube)

    Like this for instance:



    Last edited by tereg; 11-19-2008 at 11:55 PM.
    INFj

    9w1 sp/sx

  4. #4
    tereg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    TIM
    EII/INFj
    Posts
    4,680
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    fwiw, I do not see him as an ethical type at all.
    INFj

    9w1 sp/sx

  5. #5
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,685
    Mentioned
    95 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I am willing to consider EII, but personally I still think LII is most likely. I don't see the consideration of "moral obstacles" as necessarily indication of his being an ethical type, but nonetheless it seems like the only realistic alternative to LII from where I stand, so it's worth thinking about, at least.
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  6. #6
    olduser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    5,721
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i think ILE. He likes to explain ideas and they are generally broad and non-specific in the political work i've read. I think an LII would have a much more bookish rational approach. His approach to provide infrmation is just to speak and give his ideas. he reminds me of me for some reaosn.
    asd

  7. #7
    ILE - ENTp 1981slater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spain
    TIM
    ILE (ENTp)
    Posts
    4,871
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default x

    By the way, the most bookish people are usually gamma SF. There are two kinds of bookish people: BP who understand what they talk about and people who don't...
    ILE "Searcher"
    Socionics: ENTp
    DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
    Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
    MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
    Astrological sign: Aquarius

    To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.

  8. #8
    implied's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,747
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1981slater View Post
    By the way, the most bookish people are usually gamma SF. There are two kinds of bookish people: BP who understand what they talk about and people who don't...
    i wouldn't make such a broad claim, but there are plenty of gamma SFs who are "bookish", i'm sure. noam chomsky, i do not think is one of them.
    6w5 sx
    model Φ: -+0
    sloan - rcuei

  9. #9
    ILE - ENTp 1981slater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spain
    TIM
    ILE (ENTp)
    Posts
    4,871
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Of course, he is NT for sure!
    ILE "Searcher"
    Socionics: ENTp
    DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
    Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
    MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
    Astrological sign: Aquarius

    To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.

  10. #10
    Twist-Tie Spider iAnnAu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Knoxhell TN
    Posts
    987
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1981slater View Post
    By the way, the most bookish people are usually gamma SF. There are two kinds of bookish people: BP who understand what they talk about and people who don't...
    Ugh. Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean when you say "bookish" - but then again, maybe I'm not alone. So could you please be more specific? 'Cause I'm extremely bookish, and I got plenty of bookish pals, and I don't think half of us are gamma SF. I'm Delta ST, and most of the rest of 'em are N types at the least.

    And after reading Chomsky, I also have a hard time seeing him as an ethical type. Reminds me of how badly I try to rationalize emotions at times.
    Quote Originally Posted by Charles Bukowski
    We're all going to die, all of us, what a circus! That alone should make us love each other but it doesn't. We are terrorized and flattened by trivialities, we are eaten up by nothing.
    SLI

  11. #11
    ILE - ENTp 1981slater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spain
    TIM
    ILE (ENTp)
    Posts
    4,871
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default x

    Hi. FMOPV there are two types of bookish people:

    Bookish person #1: a person who has a certain knowledge about some stuff and is always trying to explain people things about it in a complicated way. The real objective of these low self esteem FUCKERS is to bore people and at the same time, prevent them from understanding what he's saying to remain as the "most intelligent person around here". This makes unhappy fuckers feel smug.

    Bookish person #2: stupid lowIQ asshole who is unable to create any new information/knowledge, and, because of that, feels frustrated. To compensate this, he reads about subjects and then speaks VERY LOUD about it , without even change any word of his speech, to fake he is very intelligent.

    Bookish type #3: a mix of these two CABRONES

    Intelligent people explains things in a simple way and people tend to understand them
    ILE "Searcher"
    Socionics: ENTp
    DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
    Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
    MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
    Astrological sign: Aquarius

    To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.

  12. #12
    implied's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,747
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heath View Post
    i think ILE. He likes to explain ideas and they are generally broad and non-specific in the political work i've read. I think an LII would have a much more bookish rational approach. His approach to provide infrmation is just to speak and give his ideas. he reminds me of me for some reaosn.
    to me, the whole idea of universal grammar, that's at its core, along with some timeless .

    see "colorless green ideas sleep furiously." it doesn't make any sense yet it's still grammatically correct.
    6w5 sx
    model Φ: -+0
    sloan - rcuei

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •