This song is really infectious and I've kind of got the hots for Leslie bouncing around in sparkly blue spandex:
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=d3vIv1EwO5A[/youtube]
What type?
This song is really infectious and I've kind of got the hots for Leslie bouncing around in sparkly blue spandex:
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=d3vIv1EwO5A[/youtube]
What type?
"How could we forget those ancient myths that stand at the beginning of all races, the myths about dragons that at the last moment are transformed into princesses? Perhaps all the dragons in our lives are princesses who are only waiting to see us act, just once, with beauty and courage. Perhaps everything that frightens us is, in its deepest essence, something helpless that wants our love."
-- Rainer Maria Rilke, Letters to a Young Poet
Gut reaction: Fe creative.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Not appealing to me very much![]()
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
I found another video of her:
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=eRcFRLzwLf8[/youtube]
I can definitely see the Fe. ISFp maybe?
And yes. She's hot.![]()
"How could we forget those ancient myths that stand at the beginning of all races, the myths about dragons that at the last moment are transformed into princesses? Perhaps all the dragons in our lives are princesses who are only waiting to see us act, just once, with beauty and courage. Perhaps everything that frightens us is, in its deepest essence, something helpless that wants our love."
-- Rainer Maria Rilke, Letters to a Young Poet
Irrationality - that must be why its not working for me.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Then step aside while the rest of us ogle her.
On one picture I see some ENFP, but then again, it's a wild guess... don't listen to me.![]()
I don't know if I must say this, but her style is SO MUCH similar to Cat Power.
i think entp. i don't think she's an ethical type.
asd
2:20 in the video, it's a rolling maul!
INTP/ILI(Ni)![]()
/5w4
"When my time comes, forget the wrong that I've done.
Help me leave behind some reasons to be missed."
I dunno, she really looks like an introvert to me. What makes you say not ethical?Originally Posted by heath
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I figured out who she reminds me of. Liz Phair:
... only slightly more earthy. I like Feist better, though.
"How could we forget those ancient myths that stand at the beginning of all races, the myths about dragons that at the last moment are transformed into princesses? Perhaps all the dragons in our lives are princesses who are only waiting to see us act, just once, with beauty and courage. Perhaps everything that frightens us is, in its deepest essence, something helpless that wants our love."
-- Rainer Maria Rilke, Letters to a Young Poet
phair - se ni quadra
fiest - si ne quadra
liz phair kind of sucks.
asd
God, she`s ENTp masquaraded as ISFp!!!
Much more likely Ti ego than Fe.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Is2q0t44hIg[/youtube]
INTj.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqVKOilZO2A&mode=related&search=[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQDpy_e5yhg&mode=related&search=[/youtube]
from the little bit I've heard I don't think I like her music
Here's another one:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWrNCCx2p5U&mode=related&search=[/youtube]
to fully understand interviews of musicians you must watch this:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dE-mxVxFXLg[/youtube]
asd
David Byrne is my hero.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
yeah, he's an amazing artist. I think he really expands upon the definition of an artist. He's not very dramatic(in a lot of his music videos--when image is all important-- he sings without a single expression on his face) but is focused, intense, intelligent, and idiosyncratic. Much more interesting than a peope who feel lots of emotions that are easily expressed in song.
asd
Ever watch the Stop Making Sense DVD? Probably the best recording of a live performance of any kind of modern music in existence.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
oh god, looks like the most fun. Video is <3Originally Posted by Baby
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LH80r_Asldk[/youtube]
What about INFp baby? Whachuthink? I kind of want to be like...she's my identical. But then if she's not INFp...I suck.
She's very Fe and very loose, seems irrational.
Not appealing to me much as a logical LSE.
So an Fe creative seems entirely possible.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
From that video, I could see INFp, yeah. She seems really down-to-earth and yet what she's saying is sort of spacey, lol.Originally Posted by maze
You are aware that it would be much easier to take you as LSE seriously if only you didn't insist on tagging so many of your posts with "me as an LSE" and hadn't chosen "Courage" as your screenname? As it stands, you've essentially become a caricature of yourself.Originally Posted by Courage
"How could we forget those ancient myths that stand at the beginning of all races, the myths about dragons that at the last moment are transformed into princesses? Perhaps all the dragons in our lives are princesses who are only waiting to see us act, just once, with beauty and courage. Perhaps everything that frightens us is, in its deepest essence, something helpless that wants our love."
-- Rainer Maria Rilke, Letters to a Young Poet
edited: responding to that earnestly is pointless, isn't it
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Originally Posted by Courage
Well, let me put it this way: what is it you gain by stating your type at every chance you get? Most of us are already quite aware that you identify with LSE in the context of Socionics. No need to constantly remind anyone, and certainly no necessity to remind yourself.
I have no opinion on or interest in what type you are. For all I know or care you could be anything from IEI to LSE. I don't know you personally, and we have rarely ever exchanged anything more than a passing comment here on the forum. I have no personal qualms against your claiming LSE as your type. But it is a case of protesting a bit too much to not warrant some measure of doubt to anyone who happens to glance at your posts on a casual basis. It is like when people think you are insane: the more you protest otherwise, the more likely it is that you are. It becomes a travesty - a sad burlesque caricature.
This isn't personal malice on my part - I cannot stand it when anyone of any type constantly makes mention of their type. The root of the problem is that: your type is not you as a person. It is both misguided and unhealthy to identify with a theoretic model of the psyche to such an extent that one insists upon touting their label to the neglect of their identity as an individual. You are not put off by Leslie Feist because you are an LSE - you are put off because that is your personal preference in women. You do not speak on behalf of all LSEs. I know many LSEs who are attracted to Fe-dominant, irrational women (more common with SEI than IEI, admittedly). It is a peculiarity of your individual identity that is speaking when you say: "Not appealing to me much" - NOT "as a logical LSE" but "as Courage/UDP."
As for your username, I apologize. No, I have no idea what that word means to you personally, or why you chose it. The critic Martin Amis famously refered to all writing as "the struggle against cliche." The most basic cliches that we have in our language are names - names for objects and emotions. "Courage" (and similar all-encompassing words, like "love" or "despair") is a cognitive-linguistic cliche, and as such will constantly invoke preconcieved biases/notions no matter whom you are talking to. So, you are essentially correct in that I can only react to that word as the cliche that it is, and not with the personal connotations it has for you.
Anyway, I hope this didn't come across as a personal attack or a rant. These are merely my casual observations from one health food-enthusiast to another.
"How could we forget those ancient myths that stand at the beginning of all races, the myths about dragons that at the last moment are transformed into princesses? Perhaps all the dragons in our lives are princesses who are only waiting to see us act, just once, with beauty and courage. Perhaps everything that frightens us is, in its deepest essence, something helpless that wants our love."
-- Rainer Maria Rilke, Letters to a Young Poet
Fair enough. I will keep that in mind.Originally Posted by Baby
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.