Delta forever [article]
Delta Forever!
Sotsionicheskaya newspaper: № 4 (31), 02.04.2004
Author: Vetches THEY ARE OREKHOV
One of our most mysterious authors. Despite the fact that repeatedly it were published both in "SG" and in a number of other, completely material publications, it still hides from us, the readers, its face and biography. Perhaps let us wait for and will see... Yes even the article of its humoristichny perhaps that on the form. Read, evaluate...
Sotsionicheskiy type: Critic (Balzac) (INTP).
El. the address: ekaburg@mail.ru
source: http://www.socioniko.net/ru/gazeta/2004-4/delta.html
Student in the school, using an auxiliary drawing during the solution of geometric problem, sometimes manifests carelessness, and triangle, on the conditions of task equilateral, it looks like rectangular. And this can be the source of the error: student during the solution forgets task and makes level the square of "long" side to the sum of the squares of two others.
Something it is more similar, apparently, it occurs also in sotsionike. Against the background of declarations about the equivalence and ravnovazhnosti of types and kvadr the respected people write suddenly [ 1 ]:
Zero sign it is not difficult to compare with ILE (ENTP) as beginnings, starting point, and since this type is compared with the identical relation. It is completely natural to compare, at least, from an intuitive point of view, SEI (ISFP) with the sign extraversion -introversion - is first introvert into sotsione and this most ekstravertirovannyy introvert, so that in this type the poles of this sign are contradicted well and are compared. Sign intuition -sensorika natural to compare with the semantic field of the type OF LEAHS (INTJ) - this is the intuitive type, whose sensorika is located in the weakest positions; therefore not difficult to represent how in the people of this type intuitive beginning it is contradicted sensory.
It is not difficult to compare, natural to compare and it is not difficult to representthat all this - guess-work on the coffee sediment. It is not difficult to represent that this method of reflections is natural for intuita, but it is here unnatural and precariously such unripe hypotheses to publish.
Continuing the already long time of the piling up of these naturalness simply buried under themselves facts in evidence and valid conclusions. First "naturally" did compare ILE (ENTP) and identical relation, did then "naturally" add to this duet "zero sign", but even if the author - ILE, where its logic? Introvert OF SEI (ISFP) "is compared" with vertnost'yu, because it the steepest of ekstravert. However, It intuit LEAHS, on the contrary, "is compared" with the intuition -sensoriko because it weakest sensorik.
The arbitrariness of such conclusions too strikes in order to assume usual purely random logical error in the author and editors. Similar cases are too frequent and have something general - they all are connected with alpha as the base for the reasonings. Asymmetry of sotsiona - typically al'fiyskiy syndrome.
It is possible to advise to student in the school, to avoid errors, not to sketch right triangles, if under the condition equilateral. To the authors of sotsionicheskikh works in exactly the same manner it is possible to recommend to ever not begin reasonings with ILE - since this is fraught with discomfiture.
Well and theoretical computations generally from the considerations of generality must be polymorphous: if the discussion deals with kvadrakh, then be carried out from the person of all kvadr. Intuita, after all, with its intuitskimi zagibonami have to be sufficient imagination in order to represent, as will appear one or other reasoning or another from the person of another kvadry. For alpha I specially propose the example: the law of the removability of kvadr from the position of delta.
With the description of the functioning of the law of the removability of kvadr a hegemony of kvadr in the public processes has the sense to examine beginning from the delta. Why precisely from the delta? The fact is that precisely the hegemony of delta is the "normal state", the Golden Age of kvadral'nykh cycles. The supremacy of another kvadr - this deviation from the ideal state; therefore in order to have the capability to describe any of these deflected states, it is necessary to first describe base state.
Repeatedly were undertaken the attempts to describe the actions of kvadr as integral structures, but they all proved to be unconvincing. This occurred because in this case they attempted to present kvadry as identical in the sense of role structure. But this is not so. Real structure possesses only delta, and the structures of another kvadr only more or less successfully imitate to the distribution of roles in the delta.
The system parameters of the functioning of Delta- society checks Shtirlits (ESTJ). It is oriented to the structural perfection, the order, the absence of the risky, unexpected, abrupt changes. It is not distracted to the "possible", it interests only "real". Therefore the society ispytyvet the high degree of confidence to the management. Entire system works as the well greased fixed mechanism - without it is bank and failures.
Certainly, this is possible, if not only system as a whole, but also all elements it it is actual of sovershenny. These elements - votchina Of gabena. Specifically, Gaben (ISTP) is continuously occupied with the maintenance of the fitness for work of the elements of sisitemy, making operating experience, it it improves them.
The improvement of elements leads to the fact that also at the system level it is possible to improve the parameters - and Shtirlits makes this. Its system innovations are always based on the already existing prerequisites in the form of the reserve, created Gabenom.
In this case the delta always considers the human factor: contemporary (it always contemporary) man-machine civilization cannot function well, if society is torn up by contradictory tendencies, fight of prides and ambitions. But this already Dostoyevsky's (INFJ) problem. It assigns moral orientator, it is public conscience. But in this case he is not doctrinaire, not the conservative - this of men, who, as a rule, pleases itself by all. Even those, who adhere to other vital rules, cannot accuse Dostoyevsky of the hypocrisy, of the fact that he requires of others of that, to that itself it is not capable.
The necessary factor of lasting stable prosperity and progress is also the skill to see new - those tendencies, which yet did not appear in the life, but already on the approach. Huxley (ENFP) is forward-looking of delta. Specifically, he will inspect the horizons in the searches for the suitable purposes, he forms the vector of motion. Moreover only Huxley is capable not only to reveal this new, but to see as this it will change life, that it is necessary to undertake so that this new would go for the benefit. To Huxley listen Shtirlits, and, especially, Gaben.
Thus, delta has ideal structure for the management. There is no intersection of authorities and prerogatives, which excludes internal competition and fight for the resources of kvadry. At the same time jointing and interaction are maximum. Big enough role in the accordion of kvadral'nogo interaction plays the spirit of kvadry - orientation to reaching of result not through the competition, not through the disputes (in the delta truth it is born not in the disputes, but in the confidence to the professionalism of each participant), but as a result of reliable fulfillment by each of the fact that it must. Delta does not encourage ambitions and stupid drawings.
Unfortunately, even ideal arranges not all. People forget about the fear, the problems. It seems them that although everything is good, it could be and better. It seems them that the small portion of risk will not injure - they forget, what to stop in the risk and to calculate this "small" portion impossibly. It is worth beginning and... Delta thus loses authority. First - authority above the minds. Society is beret acceleration, disconnecting brakes.
This does not mean that the alpha poor or specially selects road under the slope. It not poor, it simply inexperienced. Robesp'er (INTJ), which changes Shtirlitsa (ESTJ) at the post of system administrator, barely glances forward. It will not be recycled (on its own words) on what there is. Possibilities interest it and it realizes them. Society loses smooth running. It will sharply bring in it, but Robesp'er it is confident, which will know how to hold control in the hands. Hold- that it it retains, but alpha for some reason always occurs in no way there, where it was going to arrive. And again, correcting situation, Robesp'er harvests to the gas. The supremacy of alpha - these are the continuous change of public decorations, the provocation of changes for the changes ("but why not to try still this?").
System problems are aggravated by the fact that Dumas (ISFP), who replaced Gabena in the field of control over the element base, is by no means concerned how to force better to work these elements. His charge To gabenu - the elements of system must serve people, but not to system. Therefore it also improves elements - but only to the side of convenience in the use. This creates Robesp'eru excess problems, but Dumas is calm: the main thing - people.
And in this to it Hugo (ESFJ), whom the language is not turned to name moralist, indulges. Its morals - let each will be happy. It is ready soak to each - in the personal happiness. It examines public problems through the prism of the personal problems of the members of society. "the happy society, he says, which consists of happy terms". It is understandable that with this hedonisticheskom approach it is any it aims to draw this happiness itself from the public feeding trough, not at all without worrying about the completion of reserves.
And while the morals of society and system at the level of elements are oriented to the consumption of happiness- convenience, but not to its reproduction, the future of alpha is located in the hands of Don Quixote (ENTP) - person, who does not completely think about that which will bring the progress, by which it is concerned, to society, to people for it new is valuable by itself, it is capable to be absorbed in by any idea, provided it was "promising". Here such invented any genetics, which opposes by its Veysmanizmom-Morganizmom [ 2, str.'"] to people michurinskomu study, cybernetics -" reaction pseudoscience "[ 2, str.и' ], which identifies man and machine, to sotsioniku - psychology of the innate constant types in contrast the Marxist study about the role of medium in molding of personality [ 3 ].
The supremacy of alpha is characterized by a swift drop in the responsibility. The reliable functioning of the well fixed mechanism of shaping of the hierarchy of purposes is changed by the conglomeration of the personal interests, directed in different directions: to infinite changes in the structure of control, to the invention of new hypotheses, to a change of the elements to the side of convenience, to the encouragement of the personality, the aim is pleasures.
Thus, two first victims of the supremacy of alpha - these are the disturbance of the unity of purposes and the transformation of morals into the servant of selfishness. And then it enters the matter of betas. It reproaches alpha by no means for those problems, which alpha brought to society. In the opinion of beta of alpha it is too weak for the management. To lead is necessary iron hand, horse must feel bridle, and the like however in Bethe suddenly occur too many "strong" personalities. Maxim considers that Robesp'er of neplokh, but too is torn off from the real soil. It is required altogether only a little order. If you want rapidly to go, care about the brakes. But Zhukov (ESTP) goes right through at this time. Is important not speed, but direction. Clear purpose and will for its reaching. Road to the purpose must be shortest, whatever pits and bumps were on the way. Only slyuntyai fear difficulties, strong they harden. And generally, it is immediately evidently on the difficult way, who there is who. Zhukov does not fear the competition: beat me, then I return your to you.
On the service lives of system, understandably already no one worries. Resources only are expended: it is economical by Maxim (ISTJ), without restraint - by Zhukov. Human factor - also resource. But beta does not shake also above this resource, hedonism in it there is not drop. Then there is a specialist in the human resource - specialist for its use for mercenary purposes. Hamlet (ENFJ) is inferior to Zhukov in the spread, to Maxim - in arrangement and understanding of details, but it unsurpassed manipulator. The morals, which it ties to the society: I answer for everything, and you carry out my orders. It frees from the heavy, especially in created by Zhukov and by Maxim moral chaos, burden of selection. Hamlet already everything solved, Hamlet knows everything, rest know how to only make mistakes. No one so collects strange errors as Hamlet.
Three-goalbeta - Cygnus, cancer and pike - dvizhetsya (it is desirable to say it rushes about) by jerks. To predict, where it will prove to be at the following moment there is no possibility whatever. In that case, when it cannot be anything planned, there remains only to dream.
Therefore being forward-looking of beta Esenin (INFP) - this is simple dreamer. The it is worse all around, the more reckless the dream. And it is simply strange that in that torn up by power contest of Bethe these dreams are claimed. Zhukov between two impacts on his manages to grasp sense and to smile, Maxim, raising its practical buildings, sometimes will be examined to Esenin. However, Hamlet simply insists, that Esenin and Hamlet - one and the same, one soul, but 4 - Hamlet, I will know how to make that the fact that we with Esenin planned - paradise on the earth. After the victory above the conservatives and the usurpers.
Sum of the supremacy of beta - complete mental exhaustion of system. All resources are spent in mezhduusobitse. Element base is destroyed. Morals is used and rejected. Chaos is changed by desert. It remained nothing: neither forces nor resources nor ideals nor purposes.
And here comes gamma. You do not know how to work, declares gamma, bearing in mind that for the work it is not must of resources and ideals. The matter enters jack (ENTJ), system organizer. Resources are not necessary to jack, but even if they are necessary, then then, smallness itself. Jack will force eight people to work by one shovel. One cuts off by shovel layer, another, naturally by hands, it removes, the third removes, the fourth levels out... Through half-hour of work on jack all are brought down from the feet - other at call four. To jack they do not give the credit: revolutions are small. Jack will to those times move three kopecks from the calculation to the calculation, until revolution grows to hundred thousand dollars.
Napoleon (ESFP) inherited the claims of Hamlet on the management of the system: to lead necessary people, but not by machines. Jack does not object to share with the authority: let Napoleon lead people, and 4 fact that they make. Napoleon is contented: all are subordinated. Jack is also contented: despite the fact that all are subordinated, matter is done.
And it is fixed after all this, but Dreiser (ISFJ) hostilely observes. He separately does not investigate the fact that people must make in order to be called by people, but he very well knows that they must not make in no case. Its morals is antipathetic. Even when it rights, it all teaches to dispose against itself.
The enumeration of deficiencies in the gamma is incomplete without Balzac (INTP). Here already who will find problems even in the absolute vacuum. And always such concentrated, that you never will understand, where it looks. But it looks only into itself. All its subconsious complexes it formulates as the public problems, which require attention. Even when it arises on tsypochki, it does not see further pryshchika on its own to nose. Certainly, and pryshchik on to nose can come out as the adequate model of external peace, but it does remain riddle - why do happen only negative forecasts of Balzac? In view of the properties of model?
Gamma can live without the money, gamma can live without the resources, that more rapid society gets tired from the gamma. So it wants the normal life: to work and to earn, to work and to rest, to rest with the conveniences. But with the supremacy of the gamma always in all especially most necessary does not be sufficient -: luxury. Luxuries with the gamma and be cannot - no one it is must. Only Napoleon sometimes will sleep on the downy pillow, but perhaps he by this does brag? Yes even pillow not new, but was reached from Hamlet, ekpropriirovavshego it in its time in the Dumases, eksklyuziv, rarity.
And then the turn of delta again comes. Gradually, without demagogy and revolutions of the plodder of delta is taken into their hands so much authority as matter. Again Gaben begins to adjust the completely eroded elements of system. _ again on this revive material base Stirliq construct control system. Special authority above the people abolishes: people are not the children, why them to lead? There remains only moral authority of Dostoyevsky, authority of a personal example. And the enthusiast of Huxley again looks in the future the most tempting possibilities.
The eternal circle of human spirit is such. There is no temptation, which would stop this squirrel wheel, but, similarly it nevertheless somewhere rolls... For those, who move together with it. And it is motionless - for those, who only stand by a number and he will grumble.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by -NFp
.
