Actually, I have made a contribution to finding her type. I've shown her that she should ignore Joy completely if she wants to actually find her type.
Actually, I have made a contribution to finding her type. I've shown her that she should ignore Joy completely if she wants to actually find her type.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
lmao
No. You haven't. You've shown you like to argue, and that your typing methods differ from mine.
If Kim says she recognizes Delta quadra values in eunice, that would suggest to me that INFj is indeed a decent possibility. I still think she seems more.... soft and flowery.... than Delta, but that doesn't necessarily mean she's not Delta. Kim, I'm curious as to whether you think that your identifying her as gentle could just be Ne/Si... or if you're fairly confident that you see Fi > Fe, too.
Why do you think we are so similar? (Originally Posted by eunice
)
You certainly are not an ISFj, one of the most dependable types.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Thanks Kim.Originally Posted by Kim
That's very sweet of you.
To a certain extent, yes. Till today, I don't really know what I personally like and I tend to make decisions that are socially appropriate eg. my motivation of going to university is not due to my strong interest in learning (even though I am interested in learning new ideas) but rather as a natural progression after graduating from junior college which everyone goes through.Originally Posted by UDP
In terms of social interaction, I tend to avoid making negative remarks infront of people even when I don't really like them. Therefore, when they made incessant unconstructive criticisms about me, I would be thinking, "why did you make such nasty remarks about me when I took so much care not to make you feel bad?" Nevertheless, I tend not to speak up against the person who made such comments because I don't want it to transform from a negative exchange to a potentially long term unfriendly relationship. The idea of having an enemy or anyone who dislikes me really bothers me. Therefore, even when I'm unhappy about someone, I prefer to keep it to myself to prevent it from escalating into something more antagonizing.
It also depends on the self-perception of the individual. I know ISFjs that think they're always very late and unrealiable, when in actuality they're 10 minutes late. Yes, 10 minutes is the maximum tolerable, but in comparison to most people, it's not really that much.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Actually, 10 minutes is very late for me.Originally Posted by FDG
My perception of been late is when the person has reached the destination before me, even though the time has not reached yet. Even when I'm the earlier one and I reached there just on time, I still consider myself late. I prefer to reach my destination 10 minutes before the actual time.
So why did you think you're late? Most people don't consider 5 minutes to be late (I do, but I learnt to be more tolerant)Originally Posted by eunice
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
10 minutes late is practically on time![]()
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I feel bad that I make the person waste her time waiting for me. I think if I'm in Japan or Germany, I would probably be blacklisted if I'm late.Originally Posted by FDG
![]()
Originally Posted by UDP
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
I mentioned it once in one of the threads. I don't think we are totally similar, but just some similarities here and there. Interest in Japanese language and culture, willingness to contribute to our society, preference for Accountancy not because we are interested in it but rather it enables us to fulfil our long term goals etc. That's what I could recall at the moment.Originally Posted by UDP
![]()
.
.
What is that supposed to differentiate between?
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
If I'm late at all I feel guilty and irresponsible, though I'm good at hiding it and pretending I don't care.
You do that with a lot of things, don't you?
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
.
I would very much prefer someone who would be honest and straightforward and tell me exactly how he thinks and feels rather than leave me guessing. I generally don't adjust well to negative comments especially about matters which I have no or little control over eg. my past mistakes and miscalculations which cannot be changed, and creating jokes on my expense to make everyone else laugh. Nonetheless, I appreciate those who chose to speak up and offer me useful suggestions on overcoming my weaknesses or solving the problem at hand.Originally Posted by Diana
I don't see the need to provoke the person to get a reaction out of them and find out what's going on.I don't believe that such matters should start on such an intense and negative manner because I don't think I would get anything out of them if I reacted that way. I would most likely just ask the person matter-of-factly. I am capable of losing my temper and blasting at someone, but I definitely don't want a fight.
But something bad must have really happened if I react in such manner.
I definitely feel good when everything is worked out after an argument. I would rather have a clear positive or negative answer as compared to a neutral one. It actually makes me feel closer to that person because it means that he trusts me enough and feels comfortable in opening up to me, and it (probably) reflects that I'm in his special circle. It always makes me feel good to know that I'm in someone's special circle.![]()
Looks like an awfully biased perspective on Fi vs Fe preference to me.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
.
.
I can't stand this. Since when are Fi people the only ones who prefer SOs to be straightforward with them? I would feel like punching my partner in the mouth if he/she wasn't honest and straightforward with me; that's what relationships are supposed to be all about. If you say you're in a "relationship" with someone, then the curtains should be drawn. Period.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
So what did you get out of that that says Si to you?Originally Posted by Diana
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
There are different types of things that people are honest about. Someone can be honest about something but still miss a huge part of the situation because they just didn't think of it.
.
Ok, so what does being straightforward have to do with type, Diana? What does hiding things from your SO have to do with type? What does feeling good/bad after an argument have to do with type? What did you actually GET from her description?Originally Posted by Diana
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
.
What's Te and Fi about that last part?
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
.
diana, you think the first paragraph shows a Te value? I associate joking at that person's expense an Se/Ni quadra thing. Liking challenges that way.
It's not inconsistent with my picture of EIIs, but it's definitely not exclusive to them, and I certainly would never claim that that specific information would be anywhere near what I need to arrive at EII as a fairly solid conclusion, as you seem to have.
And I still don't buy being straightforward, whether with SOs or friends, as part of a person's type.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
.
.
My point is that I don't see how it points to EII over any of the other possible types that are being considered. ESI does seem less likely, but other than that I don't see it pointing to either SEI, IEI, or EII in particular.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I am not taking Accounting as my major any more. I was considering it. Business Admin right now. I do not see in you a willingness to manage others towards success.Originally Posted by eunice
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
I am glad you highlighted the "could" part. I think a lot of people who do not "value"Originally Posted by Diana
appreciate useful suggestions.
Socionics: XNFx
MBTI: INFJ
.
And you think you could manage anybody, after writing those endless rants about yourself here? Sorry but it really had to be saidOriginally Posted by UDP
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
You're so full of shit.![]()
You can see UDP giving orders?
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...