Has anyone ever thought, as reality being objective, that socionics, which is in many cases subjective, has many flaws because it does not completely correspond to reality? I personally like to work out flaws in something in order to improve it, and I think that the key may be to ground this subject to reality as much as possible.

I do think that there are some facts in socionics because I have been able to predict the relationships I would have with other people as well as know what their hidden agenda is and knowing how to purposely affect it.

So patterns do exist, but there are also many flaws involved. By going in the direction of basing socionics in reality, we might be able to not only give more credibility to the subject, but also save from major potential errors, like MBTI.