I am just curious to see what you guys think, but I am beginning to believe that socionics is meerly a creative amalgimation of the logic of someone with a dominant... what do you guys think?
Yes
No
Socionics is a result of :Ne: ... ?
I am just curious to see what you guys think, but I am beginning to believe that socionics is meerly a creative amalgimation of the logic of someone with a dominant
100% yes. You can tell by the total lack of organization of its theories.
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
And I am not saying that just because Augusta was [when she was alive] an ENTp ... my entire grasp of socionics has literally been accrued by 90%
experiementing and probing patterns out of my enviroment along with personal experience and invented typology test ... the other 10% I got from doing 2+2 with what I have read and creating something I felt was new and origional from it ...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote