Last edited by silke; 07-16-2014 at 12:15 PM. Reason: updated links
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
ESTp
Could well be, I was thinking more along INFJ though.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
ESTp. And Dio, are you trying to suggest that Bruce Willis could be either an ESTp or an INFj?
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
Either could be true.Originally Posted by Logos
Actually I am thinking he could be INTJ.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpz4v6_EZ6M[/youtube]
dunno. he reminds me a lot of an ex of mine who i can't stand anymore. he seems (the ex) like a beta extrovert of some sort. although i've found that the "accepted" typing on willis is like, ESTj, everywhere. i don't know where people are getting that. i remember that lytov had suggested ENFj, which i might buy! i don't have any arguments for or against ESTj, but i do think INFj is incredibly unlikely.
edit: can i just say i find him incredibly attractive for reasons completely unknown to me? i think he was my first "celebrity crush" ever.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
How can you see ESTp and INFj in the same individual? Except as in, "I have no idea, he could be anything?"Originally Posted by Dioklecian
![]()
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
ESTj very clearly imho. A rational type for sure, I could accept ISTj.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
polr
One has to keep an open mind at all times in order to achieve an accurate typing.Originally Posted by Expat
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
LSE ftw.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I think he's ESTp. And I think his ex-wife Demi Moore is ISTj.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Demi is ENFP IMO.Originally Posted by Slacker Mom
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Bruce Willis cannot be an ethical type. At least that we can be absolutely sure of, based on V.I. and general appearance.
I'm pretty sure LSE.
>_>
I think it's obvious really.
I agree with you on Demi Moore. Not sure on Willis, but he is apparently on good terms with Demi Moore.Originally Posted by Slacker Mom
It is easier for the eye of a camel to pass through a rich man than for a needle to enter the kingdom of heaven.
Yeah, me too...I thought he was pretty much the strereotypeOriginally Posted by ThePeddler
![]()
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Ditto.Originally Posted by Rick
Yes I agree with you Rick 100%, Bruce could be ESFJ on second thought.Originally Posted by Rick
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
I have written about him in "the problems of philosophy." He seems like fine portrait of LSE.
http://thinkexist.com/quotes/bruce_willis/
Seems Se valuing to me, based on these quotes. And most likely ST.
Bruce Willis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
My guess is SLI
SLI or LSE
Last edited by matilda; 03-08-2010 at 07:13 AM. Reason: well there ya go
SLE is my guess
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
IMO: according to his biography, LSE
IMO: according to VI: LSEor SEE
![]()
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp![]()
DCNH: Dominant![]()
--> perhaps Normalizing
![]()
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
He wants you, Marie... Like seriously.
:wink:
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp![]()
DCNH: Dominant![]()
--> perhaps Normalizing
![]()
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Te is obvious, but I don't see Ni/Se
Bruce Willis - ESFP - Napoleon
![]()
He's older now, but having been around males of his kind since I was young, I always thought he used to look the quintessential middle-aged beta ST. DarkAngelFireWolf69 types him LSI it seems
Delta STs are made of different stuff.
Sicuramente cercherai il significato di questo.
I understand where LSE is coming from, but I think he's a beta ST. I always saw him as an SLE.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
SLE, prolly Ti sub
~ ESTP ~ SLE ~ 7w8 ~ Sp/Sx ~ Fire ~ Aries ~ Beta ~ Gryffindor ~ Summer ~ SLUEN ~