yeah dude. he seems like the kind of guy who wants to eat high quality foods from all over the world and then make woodcrafts. he doesn't all seem like a controlling, aggressive, and extremely goal-driven man. nah not that. he's totally into sensory perceptions. irrational all the way.
asd
He was ILI INTP-Ni {THE AUDITOR per my archetypes}like Ivan Pavlov.
~* astralsilky
Each essence is a separate glass,
Through which Sun of Being’s Light is passed,
Each tinted fragment sparkles with the Sun,
A thousand colors, but the Light is One.
Jami, 15th c. Persian Poet
Post types & fully individuated before 2012 ...
McCain was an ESI-Se; he dressed originally and in vibrant colors like ESI-Se tend to. McCain as LSE and SLI make no sense. Obama was the opposite subtype, notice the difference in how much less original Obama's perceptions are, how much more commanding and serious he looked and sounded, how his clothes were darker, and how much less calm he was compared to McCain in the 2008 debates.
I can't see how anyone thought he was a Delta. He was totally ESI-Se. Not sure why he would be more representative of the ST Pragmatist club than the SF social club, he was totally into knowing who everyone was and everything about them and in the debates with Obama, John McCain didn't show much logic or knowledge nor did he even seem to care to. LSE-Te don't keep that much track of people and into partying like John McCain did, nor do they display that much interest in that many people as individuals, they don't know people at as deep of a level as John McCain did. Besides, in his youth he V.I.'d as ESI-Se, he looked kind of like Irena Sendler who was also an ESI-Se. He was way more natural and uninhibited with people than LSE-Te are.
So many people confuse ESI with LSE; also, even though socionics isn't very good for relationships, Ron Paul was probably his conflictor and they didn't get along well at all (I used to think Ron Paul was an ESI, but the more I think about it the more I think he was an ILE-Ti)... they held almost entirely differently views. ESI are probably the type least likely to support totally stopping the current foreign policy (remember, Woodrow Wilson was an ESI-Se). Even Ted Cruz was an ESI-Se and he supported more military spending.
I'm sorry, but I'm psychologically disturbed.