Creative subtype a hindrance?
I think this could be lumped in with another thread, if one of the mods feels it's better categorized somewhere else feel free to do so.
So, there are a few options to consider. A producing subtype makes you more like your lookalike. Does this mean your program strength goes down and your role up; does it mean you are more aware of your role while the relative strength of the functions stay the same; does it mean that you mesh your role and your program together.
I feel that this could mean something to the "purpose" of finding duals and such to support your first function use for the collective unconscious..
Btw, it doesn't really matter to me how you talk about subtypes; im talking about differences in information processing between people of the same type. The creative function has the same relation to the program regardless of a subtype. Outside focus is outside focus under any name.
Re: Creative subtype a hindrance?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ms. Kensington
So, there are a few options to consider. A producing subtype makes you more like your lookalike. Does this mean your program strength goes down and your role up; does it mean you are more aware of your role while the relative strength of the functions stay the same; does it mean that you mesh your role and your program together.
Yes that's how some people see it. A Ni-ENTj would be similar to a Ni-ENFj, for instance. The Ni-ENTj's Te>Fe preference would be -- buffered even as still existing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ms. Kensington
I feel that this could mean something to the "purpose" of finding duals and such to support your first function use for the collective unconscious..
There are many discussions on this -- the most supported view (in terms of people supporting it) is that rational dual subtypes match better, as do the irrational dual subtypes.