Printable View
I just met a girl and I'm having trouble identifiying her type. How do you distinguish between an ENFJ and an ENFP? What characterises them both? I'm an ISTJ so obviously there's a huge difference between the types, but conflicting relations aren't so evident upon first contact.
The ENFj pretends to be emotional the ENFp is emotional
Realize if the person needs a static ISTj aggressor
or a dynamic ISTp caregiver
I had this dilemma a while back when I mistook my ENFj friend for an ENFp. I've had extensive experience with both types, so hopefully my input will help. I won't be describing the functions of the two types as much as the appearance of the two types, because you told me your main goal was to figure out your friend's type.
ENFjs are incredibly effusive, expressive, and emotional people. They project their emotions outward and are very interested in others. They will likely ask all kinds of questions about who you are, what you're interested in, and what your life is like. Initially they might seem invasive or prying, but in most cases their interest is sincere. Some are more intense than others, but being people-focused is their main distinguishing factor.
ENFps' emotions are directed largely inward. They are incredibly kind, outgoing, and dynamic people (which is why you might confuse them with ENFjs), but they express their emotions very differently than ENFjs. In essence, they don't have the intense :Fe: that ENFjs do. They can be nice to people, but in many cases they're actually quite shy and reserve their most intense emotions for their close friends. ENFjs spread their :Fe: like wildfire - their personal energy and dynamism is off the wall, while ENFps tend to be a bit more subdued. ENFps tend to be more reflective with their emotions.
While ENFjs' personal energy is largely directed toward interpersonal relationships, ENFp's personal energy is largely directed toward ideas and creative pursuits. ENFps are often interested everything and anything esoteric, bizarre, unique, and out-of-this-world. They have that special :Ne: brand of humor (here's an example: www.myspace.com/ryanrodney - read his blog), which is quirkiness personified. Basically, :Ne: involves seeing all of the possibilities, re-examining them, and putting your own personal (and oftentimes crazy) spin on them. Creativity comes first for ENFps.
Another key area of difference is working habits. ENFjs are usually workaholics - their hidden agenda is to be successful. Many of them find their niches in upper-management because they have a strong drive to succeed coupled with a strong need for control. Other professions include the caring professions (nursing, counseling), business, politics, and communications. They're also usually neat freaks and are very planful with their time.
ENFps usually prefer working for themselves in some kind of creative capacity. Many are writers, teachers, designers, artists, etc. They're also very involved in politics and the caring professions. Their hidden agenda is to know, so they're very often interested in a range of academic subjects, particularly philosophy and the sciences. They can be very successful, but they usually don't work for the sake of working - they value their free time and are usually most productive when they're passionate about what they're doing. As for their management of their personal lives, they tend to be on the messy side and are more spontaneous than ENFjs.
I know this description is somewhat incomplete, but I have to go, so I'll leave you with this:
ENFjs - INTENSE personal dynamism and interest in others. They tend to appear more conventional and accepting of social norms
ENFps - INTENSE personal creativity and interest in ideas. They tend to be more offbeat and rebellious toward social norms
Since both are extroverted feelers, each loves people and is talkative, but when you tip the scales, ENFjs are more people-focused while ENFps are more idea-focused.
Here are some real-life examples of each type (and I'm sure people will disagree with me, but I'm pretty confident in my typing):
ENFp - Ryan Reynolds, whose blog I linked you to
ENFj - Oprah (I couldn't think of anyone else at the moment)
If you have any more questions, feel free to ask :wink:
If you want the simplest way to distinguish between the two, ask yourself this: is she more quirky/offbeat (ENFp) or more refined/conventional (ENFj)? Once again, it's not that each type is always one or the other, but each is usually more of one than the other.
The kind of conversation.
ENFj are single minded. They take a topic an speak a lot about it without switching to another. This keeps their dual, ISTj, at peace.
ENFp are very changing. They take a topic and at without the lightest warning they switch over another again and again. This confuses Ne PoLR types (ISFj and ISTj) a lot, because they can't keep on with the jumps and become irritated.
ENFjs are more spiritually "woo!" the one i know best is very into astrology/evil eye/omen stuff, as per DarkAngelFireWolf69's description. she's a lot more "intense" in an EJ sort of way and will go on and on about how "unoriginal" something is. she likes uniqueness in everything. she is an incredibly (as in, scary) hard worker and extremely self-disciplined like a lot of beta quadra members are. she takes a ton of care of her appearance and will like, work out in a sort of maddening way where you're wondering if she's even human (like whoa where do you get the energy to work out, work 80 bajillion hours a week, plus have 3 kids?? wth?) on the other hand their self-sacrifice or whatever, can be really impressive? that is supposedly one of the reasons they get on well with ISTjs (like they "break through" to the ISTj with their excessively hard-working nature.)
i don't think ENFps are "lazy" as much as much as, like uninspired said, they aren't just working for the sake of working and they value their free time more (the :Se: hidden agenda is absent.)
i find ENFjs to generally be more sarcastic and sometimes they can have a morbid sense of humor which is great.
the ENFj i know best always goes on about how you shouldn't touch other people's things and such. this keeps the ISTj, her dual, at peace. (;
Thanks everyone.
Come to think of it, I think she might be INFp. I'll give you a little description about her. She hates it when strange guys touch her at parties and lashes out at them. She writes notes to herself and posts them around her room so she doesn't forget the little things. She enjoys going out but not working. She enjoys going to local places to hang out where she'll bump into friends rather than going to the city. She studies media and is quite creative and know's how to create a warm atmosphere. - I know this isn't much to go by but I'll post more when I find out more.
It's funny that you say that; recently an Fe-dominant (one who at least seems very emotional) said to me how an ENFp was more emotional than she was. I always assumed that Fe-dominants were actually more emotional. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by FDG
it also helps to explain why Fi's tend to think of Fe's emotional shows as being faked :DQuote:
Originally Posted by thehotelambush
Yeah. I mean, they both have cried in public before, but for different reasons. The Fe-dominant would cry because she got a C on a test :8* whereas the ENFp would because her aunt and uncle were getting divorced. That said, I think I prefer superficial emotions. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by anndelise
i was thinking soon after writing my previous post here that it'd be easier for a TiXe to be around FeXi because of the magnified expressions of emotions and how the FeXi allows little to no vagueness as to what the emotional focus is, and how the emotion is related to it.Quote:
Originally Posted by thehotelambush
when in a group setting, this accepting Fe allows the FeXi to mirror what's going on in the group, and magnifies it clearly enough for the TiXe to catch on
How well put, I think every type does this with their dominant function:Quote:
Originally Posted by anndelise
FeXi magnify the group dynamics clearly enough for anybody to catch on ("You're a LIAR!!!").
TeXi magnify the project dynamics clearly enough for anybody to catch on ("Absolutely USELESS!!!").
NeXi magnify the underlying state clearly enough for anybody to catch on ("This is TYRANNY!!!").
SeXi magnify the overlaying state clearly enough for anybody to catch on ("BOOOORING!!!").
TiXe magnify the rational justification clearly enough for anybody to catch on ("It makes NO SENSE!!!").
FiXe magnify the ethical justification clearly enough for anybody to catch on ("People WILL DIE!!!!").
SiXe magnify the relations in ones environmental clearly enough for anybody to catch on ("This doesn't belong HERE!!!").
NiXe magnify the environment development clearly enough for anybody to catch on ("FUTILE!!!").
at least I think it would be like this.
lol, that's good. I would switch Ne & Se, though.Quote:
Originally Posted by snegledmaca
Ne keeping the underlying state (because N is implicit)Quote:
Originally Posted by thehotelambush
Se keeping the overlaying state (because S is explicit)
just switch the tyranny/boring examples?
Yes, I was referring to the examples.Quote:
Originally Posted by anndelise
I was actually wondering about Si and Te and whether they are good because I assumed what they should be purely theoretically.
How about a "What a mess" or "It sticks out like a sore thumb"or the emotional version "Because it SUCKS!!!" for Se? I just can't see something as theoretical as an elaboration on state of affairs being a trademark of Se dominance, I can see them either brushing the matter aside or taking care of it but actually indulging in the matter seems very Ne to me.
I was actually split at where exactly to place the boring example, it seems to fit both Se and Ne dominance IME.
what are the fundamental differences? not in the sense of enfjs value Fe over Fi, that stuff is obvious, Im talking real world examples, how do they come off differently, in the same situations what would they do? etc. Im trying to find out if Im one or the other and the whole preferring Se or Si line of thought really isn't helping.
hmmm, well my aunt is enfj and my mother is enfp. My aunt is far more argumentative and opinionated. My mother is more flighty and totally Ne, tosses out ideas left and right. My aunt is more outwardly expressive of what she's feeling, whether negative or positive and doesn't try to hide it. My mom is more reserved and never knows what she thinks about stuff. Let me try to think of more specific examples.Quote:
Originally Posted by thePirate
ENFj
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2E7PbftMiA
ENFp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHB3QOBBof0
ENFp-Ne (possibly ENTp)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxtdIF6Sa-k
That is a strange question. ENFjs and ENFps have almost nothing in common!
In other words: ENFjs create problems and make trouble - ENFps solve problems and pacify others. :whistle:Quote:
Originally Posted by socionionics.com
I like how you spelled your source. Do they sell onions there?Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnDo
LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Parkster
Like how can you distinguish both? Because I'm usually confused 😕
These two types are not that difficult to tell apart.
Just start a conversation about sex and/or politics. The EIE will crack dirty sex jokes, generalize about groups of people with gushy imagery (e.g. "I'd love to dine on the native wildlife here" [referring to women], "it's so hot today that even a spinster could get her loins wet") and the IEE will get triggered, melt down and accuse the EIE of being a sexist misogynist fascist bigot. The EIE will be stunned by this reaction, as they were just trying to energize people and make them laugh. The IEE however is on the warpath against "injustice" and will try to shame the EIE by dissecting all their flaws in front of others.
So basically the difference is eie are more open to sexual jokes. And iee is not?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuivienen
Hmmmm.. Okay.. I think I'm getting it... XD yeah i think my two real life friend is eie confirmed i guess. Because they're very open about talking sex, homosexuality, masturbation and stuff..
But, the iee i know yes.. He's confirmed i guess? Like he's battling about good and evil like he's talking like he doesn't drink.. He joins a party but he doesn't drink at all.. And then, he's usually cracks up joke in an attention seeking way.. And then, sometimes you'll see him happy, but sometimes you'll see him sad.. Sometimes he's complaining about his friends.. Sometimes he's talking about connecting with other people.. Is this iee???? XD the first time i met him, like two iee, the first time i met them, they're not that very welcoming.. But later they'll get friendlier at you. And starts to joke. They both love to joke around.. And i think they have a crush on me both. (lolololololol jk)
So iee are not friendlier with new people? Is that right??
And eie are very welcoming of new people??
IEE is p (irrational), EIE j (rational).
Rationality / Irrationality (also: Judging / Perceiving or Shizotyme / Cyclotyme ) is one of the 4 Jungian dichotomies, and one of the 15 Reinin dichotomies. Rationality in socionics is a perceptual quality defined by a focus on actions and emotions. In contrast, Irrationality means a focus on states of mind and body.
Typical Characteristics
Rationals
- Tend to plan ahead, make decisions early
- Are more often rigid and stubborn
- Do not like to change their decisions
- Tend to finish what they started.
- Usually have stiff movements.
- Usually more 'authoritarian' leadership style.
Irrationals
- Tend to wait and see, more spontaneous
- Are more often flexible and tolerant.
- Change their decisions frequently.
- Tend to start new things without finishing them.
- Usually have gentle movements.
- Usually more 'democratic' leadership style.
EIEs deal with -Fe, which means being focused in negative emotions often. Then IEEs are more positively focused, therefore look happier often. They look "childlike", they have an infantile aura, they are whimsical and are always rambling. They get excited about possibilities of adventures and business. EIEs on the contrary are more realistically oriented, and are often interested in what, when and why.
EIEs tend to have a heavier or darker aura than IEEs. Sometimes they dont avoid expressing it to ppl. IME its very very rare that an IEE express negative emotions to ppl, especially strangers. They are not very confident in expressing negativity in public. They just do it with close ppl. They always try to keep things polite. They fear expressing anger or concerns. Finally, IEEs are childlike, they want and need attention and to be taken care of, while EIEs are victims, they are often devoted and selfless at home.
To me its more easy to notice EIEs than IEEs. They are louder, they wear distinctively and have certain "attitude" thats hard to ignore (along with that, they can laugh too loud, express emotions openly, move their hands etc). IEEs can be much more modest in public. Usually look well behaved or simply softer. They strive to be nicer and pleasant.
Oh, and IEEs are very curious, like interested in details and unusual things. You can hardly have a conversation about topics like that with an EIE.
I met healthy eie in real life. :/ so basically they're curious too and very open.
I think EIEs are very good speakers (in large groups) while IEEs tend to prefer communicating with each person alone.
When you get to know them, EIEs can be provocative, intolerent of people and they're very honest, they sometimes say things that hurt people even if they know it, for people to improve themselves, maybe? They want to change people and they feel like they're a missionary.
IEEs are often very careful around people and don't say things honeslty because they don't want to offend. They might seem cold and serious at first (like EIEs) but if they feel comfortable, they will become very warm and bubbly and yeah they will start cracking jokes.
I feel that IEEs are more concerned with being liked and they care so much about people's opinions about them.
EIEs can often impose their opinions on people and they can be very stubborn, when IEEs often run away from conflict and they do their best to avoid such situations.
EIEs are organized and like stuff to be in the right place. For IEEs it's hard for them to be organized.
When IEEs try to help someone, they do so with giving you quick insights/advice and leave you to do the rest. When EIEs try to help, they try to change your thoughts, they're very good in changing people's mentalities.
Exactly!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Daisy
Nothing of what I mentioned means unhealthiness chickie. I was pointing out how they look/ appear so you can differentiate them. The -Fe appears in theory. - IEs are more aware and focused in the negative sides of functions than +. Meaning they notice it and experience it more than +. I'm - Si, I'm often more aware of what I don't like and makes me uncomfortable than about the nice sides of Si. I think that I often experience more feelings of discomfort (not just physical also psychological) than +Si types, for example.Quote:
Originally Posted by idontgiveaf
Good posts so far on the difference between the two. EIEs tend be significantly more comfortable in large groups than IEEs. EIEs are more darker openly and like to talk about negative issues openly. As for myself, I prefer to stay out of the limelight as much as possible in large groups, but I open up in small groups or with individuals depending on how comfortable I feel with those people.
It is kind of out of my control too. I may have strong Fe, but it is completely unconscious so it turns on or off based on how I feel at the moment rather than what I want or need. I guess that is typical for a demonstrative function. EIEs on the other hand, are completely in control of their Fe and use it effectively rather than sporadically like me. I am so last mind you, so other IEEs may behave differently than I do in these situations.
Good post, I agree with almost all of it. IEEs are very much more individual-oriented, EIEs are more public- or community-oriented. Less comfortable with conflict vs. more comfortable (or even tend to create it).Quote:
Originally Posted by Daisy
However, I wouldn't quite say that IEEs are "more concerned with being liked" -- in the sense of avoiding conflict and controversy and getting along with people yes, but they are less concerned about making a positive impression beyond the baseline of merely getting along.
Organizational ability seems to vary wildly among EIEs but they can be workaholics like any other Se valuing extrovert. Betas tend to oscillate more dramatically between chaos and order -- again a lot of this has to do with extremes vs. middle ground stuff.
Humor is another thing that varies a lot.
One likes Si, the other likes Se. Its pretty simple to see once you understand what Si is and what Se is.
Likes as in---> needs it for stability. Not like as in a preference.
I relate to both, moreso to IEE, but neither hits home completely :thinking: As for some input here - recently I watched this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiwiLfuXHPI
And made a big ass transcript. It's not entirely finished in terms of formatting, but I can do that. If you're interested and want me to publish it here please let me know.
oh my god yes, please post transcript
Reading this, I get the impression no one really knows the difference between the two types here...
P.S: I have to correct myself, @Crystal actually illustrated the differences rather well around the end, I only skimmed her post at first.
Help us, Momlimpia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Olimpia
Yeah that's true, I meant it in the sense of avoiding conflict or animosity. EIEs tend to be provocative with people unlike IEEs. I sometimes feel that EIEs do/say things to get a certain reaction from someone so that after they decide if he's good or no, so they can put him in a category. They do it often and it annoys the heck out of me.Quote:
Originally Posted by thehotelambush
Quote:
Originally Posted by idontgiveaf
.Quote:
Differences between EIE (ENFj) and IEE (ENFp)
1. When meeting someone new, ENFjs are not as likely as ENFps to perceive "getting to know somebody" as a special kind of activity. ENFjs know very well why they are getting acquainted (i.e., what the purpose of the relationship is, be it business, personal, travel, etc.). ENFjs, in contrast with ENFps, do not divide the process of getting acquainted into consecutive stages; rather ENFjs immediately establish the necessary emotional distance in contact and can regulate it if needed. To bridge the gap between poorly acquainted people in a group ENFjs amp up the emotional tone; this can be mutually experienced happiness or misfortune. The name and title of the person are of secondary relevance to ENFjs and their relationship with the other person.
2. ENFjs tend to plan ahead, making decisions early. On the other hand, ENFps tend to prefer a wait and see, more spontaneous approach.
3. ENFps tend to perceive events in an episodic manner, i.e., they see events evolve in discrete states rather than continuous changes. On the other hand, ENFjs tend to perceive events in a continuous sequence; i.e., they see events evolving fluidly rather that one state to the next.
4. When describing the stages of an event, ENFjs are more likely to focus on how stage A leads to stage B, how stage B leads to stage C, etc. ENFps, on the other hand, focus more on the stages themselves without necessarily seeing or emphasizing the transitions or causes and effects of the stages to the extent that ENFjs do.
5. When planning to complete something, ENFjs are more likely to focus their attention on the goal itself, overlooking and deprioritizing the individual actions needed to reach that goal. On the other hand, ENFps tend to focus their attention on the each action; i.e., they're focused on how each decision and choice is being made (towards reaching the goal), in a step by step process.
6. ENFps are more likely to believe in objective truths than ENFjs. That is, ENFps are more likely to believe there is a correct or best way of doing something than ENFjs.
7. ENFps tend to internally combine emotional exchanges with other activities rather than separating them out like ENFjs. E.g., ENFps see having fun occurring simultaneously with other activities, such as work or even serious affairs. ENFjs are more likely to internally separate out having fun with other activities, although the two can be interchanged at a high frequency.
8. ENFps are comfortable making changes and adjustments to their decisions quite frequently. ENFjs, on the other hand, prefer to not make changes to their decisions.
9. ENFjs tend to have stiffer more angular movements. ENFps tend to have more relaxed fluid movements.
10. ENFjs tend to have a more authoritarian, hierarchical leadership style than ENFps.
11. The "comparison and verification of concepts" is a more common phenomenon among ENFjs than ENFps. This comparison not only concerns ENFjs methods, but also their understanding, terminology, etc. ENFjs are attuned to the fact that different people might understand and interpret different concepts and terms differently. They perceive terminology as well as actions of other people as part of the subjective concept inseparable from personal opinion, position, intent, etc. In contrast to ENFps who perceive terminology as "objective," ENFjs understand personal differences behind terminology (this applies even to well established terms) and they attempt to compare and verify them.
12. When conversing, ENFps types are inclined to communicate in the form of monologues, where each party has "its turn." Because of that they subconsciously attempt to transform a dialogue into a series of monologues. Conversely, ENFjs tend to prefer more of a question and answer style format.
13. ENFjs are more inclined to believe there are relative truths than ENFps. That is, this relativity is perceived by ENFjs as an extenuation of the differing beliefs, opinions, intentions, etc. of each person.
14. ENFps are more likely (than ENFjs) to use special rituals or other culturally accepted formalities when forming relationships with others. What that means is that the emotional proximity and relationship status for ENFps be more externally predetermined. Additionally, ENFps generally progress in relationships through stages, and therefore are more familiar with these stages than ENFjs. ENFps tend to be more linear in their relationship progression than ENFjs, and ENFps assign importance to the formalities of recognizing the start and end to each of these stages.
15. ENFps are able to change and make adjustments to their goals more easily than ENFjs (depending on how progress is being made, etc.). ENFjs on the other hand, prefer to stick with their original goals.
16. ENFps are rmore relaxed in their natural state than ENFjs. However ENFps will mobilize and concentrate when needed to accomplish an objective. After the task has been completed, ENFps demobilize again. This state of demobilization is the natural state of ENFps.
17. ENFps have a relatively higher stress tolerance than ENFjs. ENFjs often struggle with continually changing situations more than ENFps do.
18. ENFjs are more likely than ENFps to use "emotional anchors" that resonate with their internal emotional condition. These emotional anchors could be a book, a movie, a place, a song, etc. ENFjs use these anchors to strengthen their inner emotional state and thus will repeat the experience: e.g., re-reading a book, re-watching a movie, continually going back to a place to experience the emotions associated with it.
19. When describing their reasoning for their actions, ENFps (more so than ENFjs) tend describe how and why they came to a certain decision, and focus less on the timing and initiation of the action.
20. When discussing work, ENFjs are more likely than ENFps to focus on the fruits of their labor, about what their effort will yield. ENFps on the other hand are more likely to focus on the environment they work in, e.g., their work conditions, conveniences, commute time, etc.
21. ENFps are relatively more flexible and tolerant than ENFjs.
22. When it comes to completing a task, ENFjs are more likely than ENFps to mobilize for longer periods of time. Specifically, ENFjs tend to mobilize for an action early and stay mobilized for a longer period of time after the task has been completed. For ENFjs, this state of readiness is their natural state.
23. When describing reality, ENFps are more likely to talk about the properties and structure of reality. ENFjs are more likely to describe reality as movements, interactions, and changes.
24. ENFjs are more likely than ENFps to tackle a task in its entirety, rather than breaking it up into smaller separate stages.
25. When describing why they undertook a project, ENFjs are more likely than ENFps to focus on the moment when a decision is made and to speak in detail about the stages of its implementation.
26. ENFps are not as inclined to compare and verify concepts as ENFjs. ENFps assume that these can have only one unique interpretation (the "correct" interpretation), and ENFps often do not think about the fact that the other person may be interpreting them differently. Much more than ENFjs, ENFps apply concepts such as "objective reality," "unequivocal facts," and de-emphasize concepts; ENFps consider that they know the "right" way of doing things, how something "truly is," etc.
27. ENFjs are relatively better at assessing the emotional atmosphere occurring in a group or during an activity than ENFps.
28. ENFjs are relatively more rigid and stubborn than ENFps.
29. When working on a project, ENFps experience more discomfort (than ENFjs) if the project does not have a clearly delineated end-goal or result. This happens because ENFps have more difficulty monitoring and understanding how the project is developing than ENFjs because they are outside of the process.
30. When developing a plan of action or process, ENFjs tend to see themselves as "within the process"; they are immersed in it. Often because of this, they have more difficulty managing several plans at once. On the other hand, ENFps tend to place themselves "outside of the process"; they dissociate from it. For them the process or situation is something external from themselves.
31. ENFjs tend to put more effort than ENFps into finishing any new project they start.
32. ENFps are more likely (than ENFjs) to seek new and novel experiences rather than returning to something already lived through. They will generally only re-read a book, re-watch a movie, or revisit the same place if they have forgotten it or are hoping to learn something new from it.
33. ENFjs tend to judge their available options by how likely the option will help them reach their goal. If a choice no longer helps ENFjs reach their goals, it will be dismissed and discontinued. On the other hand, ENFps prefer to continue pursuing their current option, opting to adjust their ultimate goal in order to fit the current choice.
34. When working on a project, ENFps are more likely than ENFjs to break up larger tasks into several stages. Then ENFps mobilize to carry out each stage (and demobilize between the stages).
35. When contemplating a task, it takes ENFps longer time to mobilize than ENFjs; i.e., ENFps prefer to spend some time in a more natural state of relaxedness which will then prepare them to subsequently mobilize and concentrate at the crucial moments, improving their performance.
36. When something is perceived by ENFjs as being incorrect, they are more likely (than ENFps) to ask why it was done that way. Instead of necessarily trying to correct the person who made the error, ENFjs attempt to understand the person's reason for their decision/action.
37. ENFps tend to start more tasks and other projects than ENFjs, but the ENFps are less likely to complete all of them.
38. ENFps tend to have a more democratic leadership style than ENFjs.
39. When doing a task, ENFjs are inclined to work for the sake of the result (for example, a reward or bonus for completing the task). In contrast to ENFps, ENFjs can renounce their comforts and conveniences for this; ENFjs evaluate their place of work by looking at what returns they get for the effort they invested (e.g., monetary, prestige, etc.).
40. When getting ready to start a project, ENFps spend more time planning and preparing for the project than ENFjs. In particular, ENFps spend more time discussing the plan, discussing options and ways to approach the project, etc.)
41. When something is perceived by ENFps as being incorrect, they are more likely (than ENFjs) to tell the person who made the error what they did wrong and how to do it the right way. ENFps are focused on who made the error and helping them to correct the mistake.
http://www.sociotype.com/tools/type-comparison/EIE-IEE