http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i114/DARCY001/S1.jpghttp://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i114/DARCY001/S2.jpg
http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i114/DARCY001/S3.jpg
Printable View
Have you ever thought of becoming a freelance assassin?
Do whatever you want, as long as you stay away from me.
Which in the list of the top ten suitable occupations appeals to you the most?
I went through an old desk of mine last week and found my career assessment test from 8th grade. Looking at it for the first time in 11 years really made me laugh. Those tests are so useless.
mine said I should be a consumer :?
(actually it was always scientist, methamaticion, or an artist)
Mine said I should be an orthodontist. :lol:
Like personality type tests, career tests are always very accurate if you already know what you want the result to be.
Yes. My target is nothing physical. But ultimately everything else is just a mean towards that end.Quote:
Originally Posted by thehotelambush
what are you trying to assassinate and why?
i always thought "bounty hunter" would be a cool profession or one of those insane arctic crab fishermen.
I don't know how to describe it.
One aspect has to do with the limitation of reality interpretation
Another has to do with potential maximization.
When you put :Ti: through exposure to :Ne:, and then :Se:, ..... maybe it is similar to the manifest and unmanifest in what daosim refers to.
If I really found out what was "most important" for me, it would be easy to translate it into other formulas for other people (not that it would be superficially identical, but identical at a root Ti level). But my question can only be answered (for me) through Ti - Se, Ne, Fe, Fi, Ni, Si.... don't factor. Te helps somewhat. -and yet, perhaps that is just as wrong, to isolate a function. I vary between incorporating all of them and Ti focus.
odd. to me you are not trying to assassinate at all. rather you are just trying to realize all potential being?
Yes, I just came across a new phrase (or at least made one up with subjective meaning):
"Potential Realization", or Potential Maximization.
If I am to guess about Tcau's crosstype theory, I think I might be INTj-ESTj
Ennegram is still strange... as I was a very clear 5 in my youth, but I can see regression to 7, and progress to 8. It is all on the basis of :Ti:. 1w9 seems to be the best "overall" fit, but it encapsulates the entire process, rather than the specific individual aspects.
Is there a link?
to what?
I assumed that was a test you took?