Are these kinds of arguments or debates typical of LSIs/ISTjs?
Is this typical of ISTjs ... ? I think having these type of debates are ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDHJ4ztnldQ
Essentially the whole thing begins with the guy making the assumtion that only those who prescribe already to his own logic are intelligent then proceeds to make boatloads of subjective :Ti: based arguments which are founded on some sort of skewed Empiracle style reasoning ability. Then, to make matters worse, he downplays intuition and even goes so far as to call Christians dillusional. That seems like some sort of :Ne: PoLR to me ...
Re: Is this typical of ISTjs? I think this is an ISTj debate
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmcnew
Is this typical of ISTjs ... ? I think having these type of debates are ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDHJ4ztnldQ
Essentially the whole thing begins with the guy making the assumtion that only those who prescribe already to his own logic are intelligent then proceeds to make boatloads of subjective :Ti: based arguments which are founded on some sort of skewed Empiracle style reasoning ability. Then, to make matters worse, he downplays intuition and even goes so far as to call Christians dillusional. That seems like some sort of :Ne: PoLR to me ...
I don't know...somehow I smell :Te: here :lol: I would say NT type. I go with Gamma and say ENTj or INTp.
About ISTjs...doesn't seem very ISTj but I don't know. ISTjs can be ruthless but I'm not sure if they would make it their agenda to convert people from their beliefs. I think they generally have their own beliefs and couldn't care less about what others believe or don't believe. Gamma NTs seem to always make it their agenda to smash others beliefs which they don't share. And it is VERY Gamma NT to use the word "stupid" when you don't agree with them.