I stumbled upon an post about Socionics "jokes"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malyshka
Every new science, as usual, has three stages of development:
• this cannot be,
• there’s something in it,
• it is known to all.
And socionics, certainly, isn’t an exception. Having passed the first one with success, it hasn’t gained a foothold in the third stage yet. There is a set of various ways of the description 16 types.
I want to offer one more description - comic.
Socion JOKES
From G.Reinin's collection.
Socionics is a rather full, rather reconcilable description of human relations with the help of rather definite terms.
If Zhukov says “yes” he means “yes”.
If Zhukov says “no” he means “no”.
If Zhukov says “maybe” he is Don Quichote.
If Dreiser says “no” he means “maybe”.
If Dreiser says “maybe” he means “yes”.
If Dreiser says “yes” he is very tired.
If Don says “yes” he means “maybe”.
If Don says “maybe” he means “no”.
If Don says “no” he feels himself Caesar.
Tell me who your dual is I shall tell to you who are you.
If Zhukov remains silent for 3 minutes, it means he is numb, if 5 - it means he is dead.
Sawyer helps those who help themselves.
Brief characteristics:
Holmes - reliable, serious, practical.
Napoleon - practical, cheerful, unreliable.
It you want to be lost in crowd - pretend to be a Gabin.
Don is always hungry,
Dostoyevsky is always ill,
Zhukov is always Zhukov.
Introverted Don looks like Robespierre, extraverted – like a cock.
Between two Sawyers it’s not worth choosing.
Who does not know typology - does not know himself.
Who does not know himself - does not know anything.
To explain the behaviour of a person it is completely unnecessary to know his type, it is enough to know socionics.
Socionics is not only a science about various types of people, but also an art to bullshit them.
Balzak says that socionics isn’t necessary for him;
Sawyer says that socionics isn’t necessary for anybody;
And Holmes keeps reading the papers.
But seriously... in my experiences...
If an INTj says "yes" he means "I may get around to it someday"
If an INTj says "I don't know" he means "No, but I'm not willing to argue about it"
ISTps don't say anything. They just shrug and then continue doing what they want.
ESFps will have already done what you've suggested before giving themselves a chance to answer you (at least that's how they are with me :lol:).
Quote:
Tell me who your dual is I shall tell to you who are you.
:lol: so true
Re: I stumbled upon an post about Socionics "jokes"
I dunno, I didn't really think of it as funny... more like mildly amusing
anyways, the translation...
Quote:
If an ESTp says “yes” he means “yes”.
If an ESTp says “no” he means “no”.
If an ESTp says “maybe” he is ENTp.
If an ISFj says “no” he means “maybe”.
If an ISFj says “maybe” he means “yes”.
If an ISFj says “yes” he is very tired.
If an ENTp says “yes” he means “maybe”.
If an ENTp says “maybe” he means “no”.
If an ENTp says “no” he feels himself ESFp.
Tell me who your dual is I shall tell to you who are you.
If an ESTp remains silent for 3 minutes, it means he is numb, if 5 - it means he is dead.
An ENFp helps those who help themselves.
Brief characteristics:
ESTj - reliable, serious, practical.
ESFp - practical, cheerful, unreliable.
It you want to be lost in crowd - pretend to be an ISTp.
An ENTp is always hungry,
An INFj is always ill,
An ESTp is always ESTp. (lol)
An introverted ENTp looks like an INTj, extraverted – like a cock.
Between two ENFps it’s not worth choosing. (:o)
Who does not know typology - does not know himself.
Who does not know himself - does not know anything.
To explain the behaviour of a person it is completely unnecessary to know his type, it is enough to know socionics.
Socionics is not only a science about various types of people, but also an art to bullshit them.
An INTp says that socionics isn’t necessary for him;
An ENFp says that socionics isn’t necessary for anybody;
And an ESTj keeps reading the papers.
Quote:
ESFps will have already done what you've suggested before giving themselves a chance to answer you (at least that's how they are with me :lol:).
http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/...ticons7/71.gif http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/...oticons7/3.gif http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/...ticons7/10.gif
Re: I stumbled upon an post about Socionics "jokes"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joy
If an INTj says "yes" he means "I may get around to it someday"
If an INTj says "I don't know" he means "No, but I'm not willing to argue about it"
These are INTjPs you're talking about, of course. :)
Re: I stumbled upon an post about Socionics "jokes"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joy
If an INTj says "yes" he means "I may get around to it someday"
If an INTj says "I don't know" he means "No, but I'm not willing to argue about it"
These are INTjPs you're talking about, of course. :)
no such thing
it's the Se PoLR that caused the INTj I was with to refuse to say no