Coaching styles - LIE and LSE
Here's a tough question for you.
How would these two types differ in terms of coaching? If that is too unaccustomed for you, then just consider managing or one being your boss.
Te in the LSE & in the LIE
I was told that you can't really treat Te as a function unto itself when dealing with a person. Basically, you can describe it as a function i.e. what its job is, but you can't say how Te manifests itself in people as a base or creative function, because it is different in the LSE, the LIE, the ILI and the SLI. So I'm interested to know how it differs in Te valuing types, particularly in the LSE and the LIE.
difference between LSE and LIE
What ways are there to distinguish the two in real life?