in the name of Gamma.
If you'd like to contest, by all means please do. Feel free to name one other INFj in this community that she even vaguely resembles, or quote anything she's said that could possibly be evidence of Se as a PoLR.
Printable View
in the name of Gamma.
If you'd like to contest, by all means please do. Feel free to name one other INFj in this community that she even vaguely resembles, or quote anything she's said that could possibly be evidence of Se as a PoLR.
Would you like to quote something as evidence of Ne PoLR before you have people running around trying to prove Se PoLR? You are making the assertion that is contrary to popular belief; the burden of proof is yours.
:PQuote:
Feel free to quote anything she's said that could possibly be evidence of Se as a creative function.
Edit: Damn you Gilligan and your speed-typing ways.
While I see your point... respecting her privacy is more important to me than convincing others, so I won't get into it. I certainly wouldn't blame anyone for not simply taking my word for it about that though.
i hereby proclaim that diana is an ESTp for reasons that only i can see. anybody who disagrees with my conclusion is an idiot.
pfft that's a horrible caricture of me.
So why would you even bother making assertions in the first place if you have no intention of backing them up? Do you just want us to try and convince you? Because I certainly don't think anyone's just going to buy this crap.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joy
nah I'm just kinda drunk and being obnoxious
she is ISFj though
I think this thread was just the product of a moment of enthusiasm or something. F(e/i/whatever) outburst.
I know another INFj who 'appears' that way online, somewhat. But she is INFj non-the-less. Sweet as sugar itself. mmm
.
I feel compelled to point out that, technically, you just replied. :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Diana
I don't see anything that makes me think :Se:, but I generally don't care that much about other people's types anyway.
I think she could be ISFj, it's not that impossible.
I'm curious now... because you used to have "INFj" in your sig for a while, until more recently...Quote:
Originally Posted by Diana
.
I am not sure of evidence, but I have personally noticed that she does have some difficulty understanding various abstract concepts at a level I would consider to be appropiate for intuitives to understand.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilligan
No, you're just a nerd :lol:
If that was a fact, it would not change diana's type any.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilligan
You, being a nerd, have a typically better disposition towards said "abstract concepts." Diana, being a functional human being, has little/no concern for your fluffy ideas about things that merit names like "abstract concepts." As such, your perception of her functions, being based on fallacious preconceptions to begin with, causes you to label her in a way that is not entirely consistent with the inner workings of the system.
So, in a way, yeah, it does.
No ... I disagree, I think it doesn't ...
But in any case I'll just state that Diana reminds me a little of how ISFjs try to act when they are being intuitive.
lol ok mcnorbert
oh boy here comes to battle portion of the thread.
Whether INFj or ISFj, Diana is very obviously a strong Fi IJ, so ethical subtype anyway.
I agree that, using VI, she looks more INFj.
Nevertheless, I think that she's probably ISFj ethical subtype.
As to the Ne PoLR thingy -- I don't think it's obvious, just like what Gilligan said about his ESTj logical subtype mother. But neither is a Se PoLR. And I do see signs of Se>Ne preference, and even glimpses of a Ne PoLR here and there.
Ah, Diana, I want to hear what you have to say! I've always felt most similar to you and Minde on this forum.
Have you had any experiences with ESTps or ENTps? If you can't figure out what type you are, you may be able to figure out what type your conflictor is.
I think figuring out which type your dual (or mirror or activity) partners are is a more reliable way to judge type than using a conflicting relation... though none of those things is a good way to type yourself.
That said, I've seen her clearly respond very well to Ni... and it doesn't sound like she's much of a fan of Si.
I've always thought she was an INFj, but ISFj seems possible. I'll have to keep track of this thread.
She is very Fi but like Expat said that could go for either one. Hmmm I haven't noticed any dislike of Ne - do you have examples?
Nothing I can share.
If she has an Ne PoLR there should be enough to find something you can share without giving out her personal info. One issue, given the extreme circumstances she's been in particularly, isn't enough to prove that she has an Ne PoLR.
Well, like I posted in that ENFj thread in Beta, she doesn't have an obvious PoLR.
She shows more Se than Ne though, and when I try to find anything that's evidence of a Se PoLR, I'm unable. There have, however, been times in private conversation (talking about her life and mine) where things that could be a Ne PoLR were displayed... but nothing that was blaringly obvious. She can't be typed based on her PoLR.
.
No, just Gilligan being an asshole.Quote:
Originally Posted by heath
:lol:
.
:?
Can I have :Ne: PoLR too? :lol:
No.
oH pLzZ?!?! i WaNt 2 B a GaMmA tOo! :o :o :o
bUt I wAnT tEh :Se: TeStOsTeRoNeZ iT mAkEs Me TeH sEkS!!!!!!1!!1!!!!!!!!!!ein!!!1!1!one!1!!!!!uno!!! 1!!!un!!1!1!!!ένας!11!!!!!1개!!!!1!!!!!одно~!1!!11! !!!um!!!!
hey Gilligan, are you gonna pass that or what?
:shock: Are you trying to hit on me?Quote:
Originally Posted by Isha
I was actually growing rather fond of it, and was considering holding on to it for a while yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by >_< why_do_i_open_my_mouth >_<
you're fucking up the rotation!Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilligan