EIE-Ni's cognitive empathy deficit/favoritism compared to EIE-Fe's universal understanding.
I really think that Alphas have the most cognitive empathy, even if the Alpha NTs have low affective empathy and that cognitive empathy and depression for another's problems and wanting others to be happy without demanding anything in return goes further than affective empathy. At first, I didn't want to believe that Gammas and Alphas were the opposite of each other, and I didn't want to believe the Article "The Real Ethics of Gamma SFs". But it turns out that the Gamma SFs do have low cognitive empathy (in terms of perspective taking more than emotions) and low fund of knowledge and low openness to knowledge, and, along with the EII-Fi and the EIE-Ni, are not very likely likely to act out of sympathy and facts (they often dismiss other peoples' rational arguments or uncommonly known facts as non-sense and think it could never possibly be that way, compared to other types) and possibilities or any sound, non-violent ideology (in most cases) or what the majority of people want, even if the Gamma SFs can read emotions well, they all too often can't research enough, and it often is about how they feel.
LSI-Ti, even if they can't read crowds very (some can though), still have factual knowledge and tend to give in to popular demands compared to ESI and SEE politicians, especially ESI.
Examples of ESI, Gamma, Delta politicians and one probable EIE-Ni who did things that few people wanted and that corrections after all the problems were demanded, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, Richard Nixon, George W. Bush, and Obama. Despite Obama running as someone who was diplomatic, he was really quite the opposite and too unwilling to try anything really new or many examples of diplomacy that would work for all parties involved (in the interest of both poor and middle class americans as well the other country's interests). Obama did what he wanted, he treated people how he wanted. Bill Clinton wasn't willing to fight Bin Laden to the death of who knows, because Bill Clinton knew that there were ethics problems with that. Even if Bill Clinton was sometimes aggressive, he and Hillary Clinton both changed their minds several times, compared to Biden and Bush 43 (both EIE-Ni) who claimed to have, but Biden was really always in favor of authoritarianism and favoritism. And EIE-Ni also change their minds sometimes, but not much, their main orientation is still towards some authoritarianism and what they want, and not other peoples' happiness or the maximum of it, partly because they have such little amount of knowledge and have such a hard time seeing logical systems for what they really are.
So it turns out that Gammas really are the most self-interested and they're likely to make categorical errors or errors of system or not taking into account all facts when conducting affairs of state. I think LIE are less likely to do that the other Gammas, but they still do it. LIE are more generous and willing to help people out on a personal level compared to their EIE-Ni business relations... with the EIE-Ni it's almost always what they want. When Vera Stratiyevskaya was talking about the Quetim Declatim model, she was saying that Declatims were being selfish. And so the EIE-Fe is less selfish, more able to wait to solve problems (they're more oriented at temporal and spatial distance and higher quality solutions than the EIE-Ni), less one-sided, more understanding of what the vast majority of people can bear (although as politicians they realize they can't please everyone and they get frustrated with that), but then the EIE-Fe talks in a more affirmative tone than the EIE-Ni.
I don't hate most EIE-Ni, it's just that they give me and many other people too much trouble (as i give too many other people trouble and i wish i didn't), and I think they get too much credit for being smart, when they're really not. I could never be happily married to one though. EIE-Fe are better. IEI-Ni are even better than both EIE subtypes... I'm still an emotivist after all and want what makes me and the people I love happy while not causing much trouble for other people. I know that constructivists often don't like to do things for happiness that it's often not a good reason for something to be done, but anyway...
Again, I say this as an LSE, an LSI-Ti, or an IEI, and I know I'm selfish too and it's not necessarily a vice nor a virtue for anyone to be selfish. But it's just food for thought, my observations, and I hope you all would enjoy it.