What is your DISC type?

I took this test (https://www.crystalknows.com/disc-personality-test) a couple of days ago and got some interesting results:

Skeptic (Cd)
DELIBERATE | SKEPTICAL | PRAGMATIC

- Park tends to crave accuracy and efficiency, and is likely to question an exaggerated statement.

- Park tends to be an objective thinker who prioritizes accuracy and results. He will likely pay attention to small details and take a systematic approach to solving problems.

Took it again today and got a slightly different result:

Analyst (C)
RESERVED | OBSERVANT | ACCURATE

- Park is likely to enjoy picking apart a tough problem to identify a quality solution.

- Park tends to be motivated by practical projects and logical thinking. His ability to identify flaws and find proven solutions can help others become more productive and be particularly helpful when troubleshooting why something may not be working.

I scored very high (>90%) on the Conscientiousness (C) scale both times, with very small percentages on the other three. Ranking 2nd were Dominance (D) and Steadiness (S), the first and second time respectively. Influence (I) ranked last each time.


https://i.imgur.com/OOrCD08.png https://i.imgur.com/DPL7oRP.png

Lol, this is really weird, we really are conflictors. My type is in the opposite position as yours. Hmm, maybe that could be my dual too though.



The Influencer - Id



People with the Id (Influencer) personality type tend to be energetic and adventurous, communicating with casual language, bold statements, and a focus on the big picture. They are likely to have an easy, relaxed, casual manner when speaking or interacting with others and enjoy the challenge of meeting new people.

Attachment 17394

:lol: You're right, we seem to be on almost exact opposite ends of the wheel.

As for the dual versus conflictor thing, a few folks on here like to call me an LSI, so take from that what you will... I do wonder if IEEs would tend to test similarly to yourself... or perhaps they would stray more towards the green (Steady) quadrant. Hmm...

DISC is just DCNH and 4 humors for corporate nerds. Debate me.

Anyways just took it right now. Got the skeptic...

Huh.

The Supporter - S Extreme Intensity: 86%
People with the S (Supporter) personality type tend to be calm, patient and respectful in their interactions with others. Rarely angered or excited, they are likely to work to maintain a peaceful and harmonious environment.

Attachment 17395

D - 2%
I - 7%
S - 91%
C - 0%

The Analyst - C
People with the C personality type tend to be objective, skeptical, and logical in their behavior. They are usually fiercely pragmatic and frequently solve problems with an analytical, fact-driven approach. They are likely to more reserved in groups and may take a long time before they build enough trust to open up

Kinda crappy test. The format doesn't exclude being all the options equally, so no "more" or "least".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dazu

DISC is just DCNH and 4 humors for corporate nerds. Debate me.

Anyways just took it right now. Got the skeptic...

Huh.

---

I ain't debating no dubmass.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by roger557

Kinda crappy test. The format doesn't exclude being all the options equally, so no "more" or "least".

---

I see your point, but I actually think this one is much better than most similar ones I recall taking in the past, like those with simple binary choices and/or vaguely worded statements.

Guys, it would be helpful if you can post the wheel and/or the percentages/rankings of each trait. And state your Socionics type if it's not already apparent, so we can see the correlations.

@Dazu What is your Sociotype? SEI?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Park

@Dazu What is your Sociotype? SEI?

---

ye ye i am the dead beat house husband that cooms and grills

Lol I was offered this test at one of my old jobs. I declined.

For the record this site is actually incomplete. It doesn't factor in conflicting blends, such as DS or CI. Which of course, is a huge problem.

Also, just because I can, here is an autistic correlation chart between DISC, DCNH, and 4 temperaments, as well as Pavlov's Typology.

Choleric
Quick response, long sustain; extraverted and task oriented, neurotic. High excitation, low inhibition; slow mobility (Excitable).
Dominant, Extraverted Rationality + Se

Sanguine
Quick response, quick sustain; extraverted and people oriented, stable. High excitation, high inhibition; rapid mobility (Lively).
Creative, Extraverted Irrationality + Fe

Melancholic
Slow response, long sustain; introverted and task oriented, neurotic. Low excitation, high inhibition; slow mobility (Inhibited).
Normalizer, Introverted Rationality + Si

Phlegmatic
Slow response, quick sustain; introverted and people oriented, stable. Low excitation, low inhibition; moderate mobility (Quiet).
Harmonizer, Introverted Irrationality + Fi

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Poptart

Lol I was offered this test at one of my old jobs. I declined.

---

Why did you decline, and were there consequences? :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dazu

For the record this site is actually incomplete. It doesn't factor in conflicting blends, such as DS or CI. Which of course, is a huge problem

---

Perhaps they don't exist (i.e. make no sense within the system as it's defined)? Are you making them up? If so, than that's your problem and not of the site being incomplete.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Park

Why did you decline, and were there consequences? :D

---

I didn’t because I had work to do lol.

One of the directors happened to be a certified MBTI practitioner, and she offered to give me a DISC test. I had already done the MBTI with her and got Infj (the test was wrong—I’m actually Isfj lol). I wasn’t familiar with MBTI and didn’t care about my results until I read the report more carefully a few months later.

Well, I have a funnier story to tell. I was asked to take a different test (can't remember what exactly it was) at one of my old jobs, refused to take it and got fired as a result. It was the last straw for them, from what I gathered. Couldn't handle someone with a brain, autonomy, and the courage to say no to things they don't want to (and are not paid to) do.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Park

Well, I have a funnier story to tell. I was asked to take a different test (can't remember what exactly it was) at one of my old jobs, refused to take it and got fired as a result. It was the last straw for them, from what I gathered. Couldn't handle someone with a brain, autonomy, and the courage to say no to things they don't want to (and are not paid to) do.

---

You are missing the point of those tests.

If you refuse to take the test, then they can fire you.
If you take the test and it proves that you are someone who is dangerous or incompetent for your job, then they can fire you.

So it’s not about the way that your haircut or your blue eyes triggers something deeply disturbing in your boss’s infantile memory. Nope. Not at all.

It’s perfect.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Park

Well, I have a funnier story to tell. I was asked to take a different test (can't remember what exactly it was) at one of my old jobs, refused to take it and got fired as a result. It was the last straw for them, from what I gathered. Couldn't handle someone with a brain, autonomy, and the courage to say no to things they don't want to (and are not paid to) do.

---

Omg that’s ridiculous lol. I can’t believe companies get away with that kind of bs.

Literally just Google the suggested types and you'll see.

The Supporter - S
People with the S (Supporter) personality type tend to be calm, patient and respectful in their interactions with others. Rarely angered or excited, they are likely to work to maintain a peaceful and harmonious environment.

I hope there is motivator here and they took the test to figure it out *fingers crossed*

Have so many questions..

On one job-related personality test, I got asked: "Have you ever felt guilty or uncomfortable when looking at a beautiful child?". The person who owned the testing agency was a Scientologist. Make of the what you will.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by myresearch

I hope there is motivator here and they took the test to figure it out *fingers crossed*

Have so many questions..

---

That's almost me. So go ahead and ask me your questions.

https://i.imgur.com/aGe9bvB.png
D - 3%
I - 2%
S - 68%
C - 27%

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eudaimonia

That's almost me. So go ahead and ask me your questions.

---

I already asked you, I was very motivated in some of my work/friend/romantic relationships with EIEs. I don't know what they have done it, because it wasn't direct at all, they have never said anything about these kind of things. Maybe you people don't know what you are doing :p I can be missing something if it is due to simple stuff that Fe provides because of my unconcious 1D Fe. I will find myself a @Eudaimonia if I start a company though :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by myresearch

I already asked you, I was very motivated in some of my work/friend/romantic relationships with EIEs. I don't know what they have done it, because it wasn't direct at all, they have never said anything about these kind of things. Maybe you people don't know what you are doing :p I can be missing something if it is due to simple stuff that Fe provides because of my unconcious 1D Fe. I will find myself a @Eudaimonia if I start a company though :D

---

I think it could be too situational to really say, I don't really know why or what I do most of the time, but I don't think it's so formulaic.

I should let someone else answer, I've already failed the test lol, but I can't really help myself.

It seems like you're just a relationship oriented person, when you feel alone and don't have others to share your time with you don't have as much energy as you do when you do have those people. If you like these Fe doms you probably like to have a laugh and a good time, this could help you forget your troubles and relax more and you don't feel as stressed from everyday stuff. I don't think these people are giving you anything you don't have, I think they are just letting you recharge and unwind and that's where this motivation is coming from.

Also, I know that my motivation comes from how I view the future if I view the future positively I have extreme amounts of motivation, if I view it negatively, well, that's not good. If you feel alone and you don't really see that changing, it could affect your energy levels.

I took this test again and got similar results. What does it mean when the symbol is closer to the center of the wheel? Some people are all the way at the edge of the wheel.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Poptart

Omg that’s ridiculous lol. I can’t believe companies get away with that kind of bs.

---

They are in a position of power and can do whatever they please, within certain legal limits. It might not be fair, respectful, rational, or to your liking, but that's just how capitalism works.

The guy I worked under was a bit of a conceited, uptight prick. He expected me to comply to his way of doing things (and to his idea of "how things should work") and report to him about every single thing. And I get really irritated when someone is breathing down my neck like that, so I either ignore or confront them about it. I did a bit of both in this case and he didn't like it. That said, I've never been a good employee. And by "good" I mean compliant. I am not someone who is going to let anyone, regardless of their official rank or status, make me take some shitty test or do something I disagree with, don't see the purpose of, or simply don't want to do. You can try to change my mind about something with good faith arguments and logical reasoning, but I don't respond well to being ordered around or doing things for the sake of fitting in.

--
I need a lot of space, autonomy, and room for taking ownership and creating impact. Which puts me in a weird position, because I am also very pedantic, detail-oriented, and people-averse (for a lack of a better term), which generally makes for a bad entrepreneur. So my personality is neither here nor there, literally speaking, and I don't really know which direction to take. I think I feel the most comfortable as an artist, creating, inventing, exploring, and putting things together. Or as a research scientist/engineer, exploring and discovering solutions to tricky problems and improving existing ones. I am trained and skilled in both areas, but still struggling to make good use of any of that and find my place in the world. I feel like whatever I am going to focus on, I either need to (1) improve my entrepreneurial abilities in order to navigate the market and make bigger and better investments (i.e. take greater risks) in the practical world of events and opportunities, or (2) adopt some employee qualities in order to more easily make a living by having someone else (i.e. an institution or an organization) manage or influence the type and breadth of work I undertake, with many of the associated risks.

/tangent

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dazu

Literally just Google the suggested types and you'll see.

---

I googled DISC personality profiles which led me to https://www.discprofile.com/ where I couldn't find such a thing; the types are the same as in the site from the OP. What is your source?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eudaimonia

I took this test again and got similar results. What does it mean when the symbol is closer to the center of the wheel? Some people are all the way at the edge of the wheel.

---

I guess you are more well-rounded, or at least that's how you perceive yourself. ;)

I would imagine your "C" score would tend to be a double digit, unlike my "I" score which fluctuates between 2% and 3%. :)

Which could also explain why I tend to be a tough nut to crack... for most people.

Disc Type
The Analyst - C
People with the C personality type tend to be objective, skeptical, and logical in their behavior. They are usually fiercely pragmatic and frequently solve problems with an analytical, fact-driven approach. They are likely to more reserved in groups and may take a long time before they build enough trust to open up.

But it seems like I'm inbetween the analyst and the editor Attachment 17410

I couldn't do this test.... I couldn't go with their narrow range of choices.... so did this one instead

DISC Assessment - Free Personality Test for Business (truity.com)


28I
27S
22C
20D


DRIVE

Takes charge and gets things done. Makes decisions and focuses on results.

CLARITY

Works steadily and systematically. Focuses on order, accuracy and precision.


INFLUENCE

Engages others and shares enthusiasm. Inspires and persuades others.

SUPPORT

Is helpful and shows care for others. Looks for ways to assist and serve.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rtht

I couldn't do this test.... I couldn't go with their narrow range of choices.... so did this one instead

DISC Assessment - Free Personality Test for Business (truity.com)


28I
27S
22C
20D

---

So you played the C and inspected to get to the point results :naughty:

C: 30
I: 26
D: 23
S: 14

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by myresearch

So you played the C and inspected to get to the point results :naughty:

C: 30
I: 26
D: 23
S: 14

---

Was that naughty what I did? :o :biggrin:

It was a much easier test for me, but I did want the full breakdown to get my 1 slice out of 16 result....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thistle

https://i.imgur.com/aGe9bvB.png
D - 3%
I - 2%
S - 68%
C - 27%

ESI

---

I got almost the same results :

https://imgur.com/OvQxTiz

https://imgur.com/Virjf6R

@Sah Kel Plaisir, I got about 82% intensity for Sc Planner type. Took the test again just now and got SC Stabiliser type this time.

Based on what was selected for traits I thought that very high S% could be more common in MBTI sensor-introverts, and that increased influence of C% might push the type closer to SJ in MBTI - socionics rational (?) Do you tend to fall in the middle of the rational-irrational dichotomy?

For what it's worth, I took the MBTI test on the same website as the DISC test and got ISFJ.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thistle

@Sah Kel Plaisir, I got about 82% intensity for Sc Planner type. Took the test again just now and got SC Stabiliser type this time.

Based on what was selected for traits I thought that very high S% could be more common in MBTI sensor-introverts, and that increased influence of C% might push the type closer to SJ in MBTI - socionics rational (?) Do you tend to fall in the middle of the rational-irrational dichotomy?

For what it's worth, I took the MBTI test on the same website as the DISC test and got ISFJ.

---

Irrationality is a clearly expressed trait within me but I started working on being more conscientious. It may have influenced my results.
I got ISTP on the MBTI test that you gave me :thinking: . There is a strange association that is made in this test with Sensing and socionics extroverted thinking (people who are S are more likely to prefere dealing with facts/empirical evidences, it may be the reason why they typed Zucc ISTJ).
I usually get IXXP on tests (INTP most of the time), so the result is not so abhorrent.

I agree that high S% seems ISXX since this description seems to describe someone who is enneagram 6/9 which is a very common enneatype for ISXX.

You can find other strange associations in their MBTI type descriptions : IXTP associated with D types, ESTP associated with S and C types and with enneagram 5...
It doesn't make any sense :indifferent2:.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RBRS

Disc Type
The Analyst - C
People with the C personality type tend to be objective, skeptical, and logical in their behavior. They are usually fiercely pragmatic and frequently solve problems with an analytical, fact-driven approach. They are likely to more reserved in groups and may take a long time before they build enough trust to open up.

But it seems like I'm inbetween the analyst and the editor Attachment 17410

---

You can check out the C and Cs profile descriptions on their website, which stand for the Analyst and the Editor types, respectively. They are not very different from each other but you may find specific things that stand out to you.

DISC C Personality Type: The Analyst Profile
DISC Cs Personality Type: The Editor Profile

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thistle

Based on what was selected for traits I thought that very high S% could be more common in MBTI sensor-introverts

---

That's an interesting observation. The correlation they make is to MBTI SF types (see here, under "Other Personalities related to DISC S").

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thistle

and that increased influence of C% might push the type closer to SJ in MBTI

---

They have ISTJ for C and Cd, ISTJ and ISFJ for Cs (see here, here, and here).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thistle

For what it's worth, I took the MBTI test on the same website as the DISC test and got ISFJ.

---

It's not an MBTI test, per se, it's a test based on Jung and MBTI, as they have stated on their website. I've taken it a few times, got ISTJ each time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Park

You can check out the C and Cs profile descriptions on their website, which stand for the Analyst and the Editor types, respectively. They are not very different from each other but you may find specific things that stand out to you.

DISC C Personality Type: The Analyst Profile
DISC Cs Personality Type: The Editor Profile

---

Probably Cs type, thanks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RBRS

Probably Cs type, thanks.

---

Which Socionics type do you identify with, if you don't mind me asking?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Park

Which Socionics type do you identify with, if you don't mind me asking?

---

Some time ago I decided to keep a list of plausible types for myself, as I found it limiting when interacting on this site and any typology community. It seems pretty common that if you're discussing something on typology and the opposition cannot answer the main point, he or she will get to the lowest form of discussion which is personal attacks, which in these places seem to take the superficial form of battletyping, ignoring the original theme in favor of "you are not this type, you are the baddies type, so bad and so bad" directly making discussion impossible.

I cannot completely fit in every situation to the traits associated with X or Y sociotype, or what someone might expect from the type, and as socionics is completely subjective in experience and lacks a proper scientific validation for any indication or typing method, I cannot really decide about what should and shouldn't be taking into account from anything outside my own opinion and subjective experience, which sometimes seems to conflict with that of others, and most times I want to avoid getting into a discussion over it, when really I don't have an absolute self-typing without doubts.
Also self-typings seem to predispose some people towards oneself, so I prefer to keep it to myself and if someone gets to some conclusion over it then I'll also have free typings.

@Park, thank you for including the links. I am still a bit confused though.

The issue I have with their 16 Personalities Test is that while it is based on Jung's dichotomies, its understanding of Si doesn't seem to match Jung's description of Si that is discussed on this forum. On the forum, Si is explained as internal impressions.

Instead the test goes with MBTI version of Si: conventional, orderly, tendency to default to known experiences and methods, set in its ways. I relate to aspects of "SJ" but I have understood these preferences to do mainly with "rationality" in socionics, not Si.

The reason I'm mentioning this is that ISFJ in the 16 Personalities test would translate to SEI in socionics, ISFP to ESI, and the result which you tend to get (ISTJ) to LSI. That's if the types are directly transferrable at all. It might not even matter or be relevant to this thread, but I thought it would be worth mentioning.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sah Kel Plaisir

Irrationality is a clearly expressed trait within me but I started working on being more conscientious. It may have influenced my results.
I got ISTP on the MBTI test that you gave me :thinking: . There is a strange association that is made in this test with Sensing and socionics extroverted thinking (people who are S are more likely to prefere dealing with facts/empirical evidences, it may be the reason why they typed Zucc ISTJ).
I usually get IXXP on tests (INTP most of the time), so the result is not so abhorrent.

I agree that high S% seems ISXX since this description seems to describe someone who is enneagram 6/9 which is a very common enneatype for ISXX.

You can find other strange associations in their MBTI type descriptions : IXTP associated with D types, ESTP associated with S and C types and with enneagram 5...
It doesn't make any sense :indifferent2:.

---

It might be similar with me, I try to improve precision because some work clients can be pedantic about details. I don't have anyone monitoring me, so have to be my own taskmaster :) That along with some OCD traits and preference for routine have led me to believe I'm a rational type in socionics.

I didn't notice a strange connection between the test's Sensing and socionics Te. Si in this test seems to be about being conventional and rule-bound, though.

Most of the responses to this thread so far have been from S and C types which I thought was interesting. Who are the D types?

The Supporter - S

People with the S (Supporter) personality type tend to be calm, patient and respectful in their interactions with others. Rarely angered or excited, they are likely to work to maintain a peaceful and harmonious environment.

I'm offended. What sort of omega male is a Supporter?

I took the DISC test to see what I would get and I got these results. I've taken it before and I teeter between D and I usually.

These are the results from the OSPP DISC Assessment Test. The calculated scores for each type are shown below.

https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/...I=81&S=50&C=44
Your highest score was for Type D. There are a number of descriptions of your type on the internet.

That test sucks ass, obviously.

Quote:

---

Hey I could see how you become a good manager lol the description seems like an embodiment of Christ or something

---

lmao I'm no Christ but I remember one time another beta IEI male said I was like a 'McDonald's beta male middle manager' or something. I thought it was hilarious because it was true.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RBRS

Some time ago I decided to keep a list of plausible types for myself, as I found it limiting when interacting on this site and any typology community. It seems pretty common that if you're discussing something on typology and the opposition cannot answer the main point, he or she will get to the lowest form of discussion which is personal attacks, which in these places seem to take the superficial form of battletyping, ignoring the original theme in favor of "you are not this type, you are the baddies type, so bad and so bad" directly making discussion impossible.

I cannot completely fit in every situation to the traits associated with X or Y sociotype, or what someone might expect from the type, and as socionics is completely subjective in experience and lacks a proper scientific validation for any indication or typing method, I cannot really decide about what should and shouldn't be taking into account from anything outside my own opinion and subjective experience, which sometimes seems to conflict with that of others, and most times I want to avoid getting into a discussion over it, when really I don't have an absolute self-typing without doubts.
Also self-typings seem to predispose some people towards oneself, so I prefer to keep it to myself and if someone gets to some conclusion over it then I'll also have free typings.

---

Thank you for answering a bunch of questions I didn't ask, Mr. Editor. :whistle:

As a side note, I find it kind of funny that you're so comfortable and nonchalant about your DISC type, yet so reluctant to say which Socionics type(s) you identify with.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thistle

The issue I have with their 16 Personalities Test is that while it is based on Jung's dichotomies, its understanding of Si doesn't seem to match Jung's description of Si that is discussed on this forum.

---

I would say their definitions (and system in general) probably match Jung's cognitive functions more closely than MBTI. They seem to have a simplified but more concise system.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thistle

Instead the test goes with MBTI version of Si: conventional, orderly, tendency to default to known experiences and methods, set in its ways.

---

What makes you think they associate these things (and I'm assuming you are deducing this from the questionnaire) with Si, and not Te, or Judging?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thistle

That's if the types are directly transferrable at all

---

They aren't. MBTT and Socionics are completely different systems, they just draw from the same source to establish their foundations. They both add their own spin to Jung's work and expand on it in different ways. Hence, their types are not interchangeable.

I haven't bothered to read through many of Crystal's descriptions, but if I'm getting pegged as ISTJ this probably means their interpretations of Si and Te are closer to Jung and possibly Socionics, than they are to MBTI.

The Counselor - Si (81%)

People with the Si personality type tend to be even-tempered and accepting. Empathetic and supportive, they may seek to help others frequently and sincerely.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Park

Thank you for answering a bunch of questions I didn't ask, Mr. Editor. :whistle:

As a side note, I find it kind of funny that you're so comfortable and nonchalant about your DISC type, yet so reluctant to say which Socionics type(s) you identify with.

---

For the DISC type there's no absolute judgement and I don't have to get it definitive, I consider it mostly secondary. With socionics, personal experience and ITR tell me it's probably more important when determining personality, and socionics forums or communities tend to take out the worst characters in it's participants, making it impossible to discuss some personal typings seriously without personal attacks and all sort of things that contribute nothing, that's why I'm more reluctant to say my list of self-typings specially in socionics forums.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Park

I would say their definitions (and system in general) probably match Jung's cognitive functions more closely than MBTI. They seem to have a simplified but more concise system.
What makes you think they associate these things (and I'm assuming you are deducing this from the questionnaire) with Si, and not Te, or Judging?

---

That's a good point. I realised I can't isolate many examples for you, because the cognitive functions have topics/concerns in common and I can't always tell which dichotomy is being tested.

From the questionnaire I supposed that: "commits" (vs. keep options open) and "accepts things as the way they are" could both be testing for Si.
Or, they could be testing for Ne. Or neither - they could be testing for rationality.

To go slightly off-topic... when I mentioned above that cognitive functions have topics in common, was sort of thinking of how strong Si can mean a person does not want to overdo things or strain themselves. Strong Te can mean a person calculates whether an exercise is worth the effort. The same end result could have been arrived at by use of either or both of these cognitive functions.

@thistle Don't forget that the rationality/irrationality dichotomy only exists in Socionics and is not to be conflated with Judging/Perceiving in MBTI. Or if you do refer to them by the same nomenclature, remember they mean different things.

Di-Driver

People with the Di (Driver) personality type are typically assertive, capable of putting themselves forward boldly, and resistant to influence from others. Convincing others to work toward their goals, they may be seen as decisive, forceful, and persuasive


I score this an ID-Influencer on different tests pretty regularly