Attachement theory in psychology
Quote:
Originally Posted by
End
It's a sneaking suspicion of mine that psychologists are intentionally not taught about them specifically to ensure that most of us don't get fixed sans meds
Hi End, I'm a psychology graduate, but I did get attachment theory as part of my tuition. However, it was not at the core of my study, because that already was diagnosing, diagnosing, and more diagnosing... Though like AWellArmedCat said, in developmental psychology it is one of the mainstays, including how it affects the way in which we develop our friendships and romantic relationships later in life.
I agree with you on the fact that far too much focus is put on medicalizing dysfunctional behaviour. Although here in Europe psychologists are not allowed to prescribe psycho-medication, we do see the lobby force of the big pharmaceuticals growing by the year. Our American colleagues already warned for this. Especially now with the COVID-19 pandemic there is an influx of people with psychological difficulties, but a shortage of psychologists, which makes psycho-medication a cheap, quick, and dirty fix in the eyes of the healthcare insurers.
It worries me, because like you said, it's not an actual solution. It doesn't address the underlying problems, but merely treats the symptoms. It's like giving someone aspirin to treat the headache they get from their brain tumour without actually removing the tumour at all. Every study shows time and time again that psycho-medication requires therapy to work properly, whereas psychotherapy on its own is enough for most people with less intense problems. Most people simply need a listening ear that doesn't judge them to reflect on and work through their problems. When they cannot find this with their family or friends, then that's what psychologists are for. But a pill doesn't listen.