Originally Posted by
Alomoes
That is what I would assume. I would also assume others would say no. And here we are. Sneezing in the light is a photosensitive reaction. It is logical to assume it is biological, and not psychologically tied. For example, crying in the cold is not Si. It is natural. However, what comes next should reveal the answer. As an example, I used to burn my eyes in the shower. I have no idea why it stopped. As such, my conclusion is Si polr. I can speculate it was the soap, but that is from me speculating. Si probably would also attempt to solve the problem. I rubbed my eyes, which made the problem worse, and this would continue. I am aware it made the problem worse because people told me it would make the problem worse. Otherwise, all I could say is that there was pain. Eventually, I started to ignore the pain. The pain wasn't an issue, it was the tendency that I would close my eyes which was the main issue.
I could be Si valuing or Si polr, but nothing else.
If I was Si valuing, I would value a solution. Tbh, I didn't really see it as a problem, and just rubbed my eyes, even though it didn't help, as it seemed natural. As such, you know where I believe I stand on the issue. This could, however, just be me valuing pain. As such, I am unsure of the true answer. However, that is irrelevant to this issue. I hope this helps in showing off what lack of Si is from my perspective.