...
Printable View
...
it's better to make a video
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...=1#post1096450
@Duschia You seem likable regardless of type. I still feel like you are a young edition of @Adam Strange
LSE still works
Good Te, blah blah, also very, very Fi valuing and very Delta Fi, all that emphasis on selfless kindness and stuff
***
BTW this was interesting "Power is the ability to control and to have something under your control. I like to be in control, but I wouldn't say I'm power-hungry or something - this is a necessity to me. I have an unconscious need of 'I have to'. Maybe I should work on that further."
What is this "unconscious need of 'I have to'", got a specific example?
LSE seems right.
:love:
Why would you doubt in being LSE?
You seem like a cool dude. You remind me a bit of my brother. He is either SLI or LSE.... he's very factual and logical but loves to be physically and verbally affectionate and abuses the heart emoji in text. It sounds like you prefer "physical touch" as your primary love language just like him.
Ned Stark is that you? Considering a lot of your thought processes are very close to mine with some key differences that point towards Te base imo you are LSE.
You come across as more diplomatic than my mental image of LSE. :Ne: as suggestive function makes more sense (SLI)
"Beauty - as trying to define it - is one of many 'attitudes' a person can held towards an object.
A personal attitude is Ti approach. If you have T type, then Ti are possible too.
"Nature 'created' it as an opposite to ugliness - and what ugliness is for?"
Here you are giving not direct definition, but you input additional term and link with it. Links - is Ti region. Te think more directly.
To understand your valued functions with good assurance is possibly only by IR effects. Directly it's easier to mistake than with dichotomies.