Type the 2020 Democratic Candidates for President of the United States

This list is by no means exhaustive, because I don't have enough time in the fucking day to keep track of the ever expanding primary. Most of the candidates below have at least been featured in the latest polls and possess a greater degree of name recognition.

Joe Biden - EIE
Bernie Sanders - LSE
Elizabeth Warren - IEE
Kamala Harris - EIE
Pete Buttigieg - EIE
Corey Booker - EIE
Amy Klobuchar - LSE
Beto O'Rourke - IEI-Fe
Tulsi Gabbard - SLE
Kirstin Gillibrand - EIE
Julian Castro - EIE
Andrew Yang - ILI-Te
Eric Swallwell - LIE
Bill De Blasio - IEE
Michael Bennet - LIE
Marianne Williamson - EIE

FFS, NO MORE BETA QUADRA. :nope:

P.S. Most of the EIEs are enneagram 3s, who are pragmatic, ambitious, competent, efficient and superficially/stereotypically may seem like "T" types at first glance, but upon closer inspection, Fe shenanigations all day!

I'd stick my ballot in Tulsi's box.

I only agree with Alonzo on Tulsi SLE Liz Warren IEE

My very vague impressions are that Beto O'Rourke is EIE and Andrew Yang is LIE. Haven't looked at most of the others.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Perpetual Now

I'd stick my ballot in Tulsi's box.

---

Is that innuendo? Regardless she is the most sane out of all of them, which is why she'll do poorly.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Carolus

Is that innuendo? Regardless she is the most sane out of all of them, which is why she'll do poorly.

---

It's innuendo but my support and admiration for her as a candidate is also genuine. She's about the only one in the democrat field I would feel confident voting for. I also happen to think she's a sexy surfer chick.

Marianne Williamson?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by andreasdevig

Marianne Williamson?

---

EIE. I think that Beta NFs are heeding the war call to sanction that Tang colored, phone booth shaped Beta ST sinkhole currently occupying the White House--I say, let them decimate each other during the primaries. lol As long as a Delta rises from the ashes, I'll be satisfied and I think the country will be better off. I'm so sick of Fe, whether for "good" or "ill" intent, holding court in American politics. It's time for something else.

I wish I hadn't seen this thread, if those typings are true, the field is pure cancer.

The only two 2020 Democratic candidates I like are Andrew Yang and Tulsi Gabbard. Both are intelligent, competent and have original ideas. I don't agree with all of their policies, but they seem to be the most anti-establishment out of all the candidates. The rest of the 2020 Democratic candidates seem either incompetent or corrupt or both.

Andrew Yang seems like an obvious NT. I thought he was LII initially tbh, but gamma NT is possible. This is him talking about inevitable automation taking over the workforce in the near future:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzksqTu9UY4

Here he talks about the need for UBI because of automation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAtyv8NpbFQ

Tulsi Gabbard might be SLE, but to be honest I've never really thought about her type. I just liked her background on what she did in the past and she's strong on foreign policy. This is her talking about foreign policy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oNwUPMe6lI

Tulsi describing the corruption in the DNC with super delegates from the 2016 election that was eventually removed:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szkh57R3IoM

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Raver

Andrew Yang seems like an obvious NT, I thought he was LII initially tbh, but gamma NT is possible.

---

https://twitter.com/AndrewYang/statu...55304429121536

Yeah, he said on Twitter that he's an INTJ. And I agree with you, I like Andrew Yang, as well.

Joe Biden - EIE
Bernie Sanders - IEE
Elizabeth Warren - IEE
Kamala Harris - LIE (? 80%)
Beto O'Rourke - ILE
Pete Buttigieg - LSI (? 65%)
Kirsten Gillibrand - LSE

edit: Andrew Yang - Based on the one brief time I've seen him on TV and the first video above + his self report + google image'ing him just now, I am comfortable agreeing with ILI.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alonzo

EIE. I think that Beta NFs are heeding the war call to sanction that Tang colored, phone booth shaped Beta ST sinkhole currently occupying the White House--I say, let them decimate each other during the primaries. lol As long as a Delta rises from the ashes, I'll be satisfied and I think the country will be better off. I'm so sick of Fe, whether for "good" or "ill" intent, holding court in American politics. It's time for something else.

---

She does seem to have that Fe-ness going on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Raver

The only two 2020 Democratic candidates I like are Andrew Yang and Tulsi Gabbard.

---

I like them too (though I wish the opt-in thing wasn't part of Yang's UBI thang), but why do you like them but not Bernie or Marianne? I see a lot of people, particularly on the right, who somehow like Gabbard and Yang yet hate on Bernie. I don't understand it.

Joe Biden - mb EIE
Bernie Sanders - mb ILI
Elizabeth Warren - mb LSI
Kamala Harris - IEI
Pete Buttigieg - mb ILE
Corey Booker - mb EIE
Beto O'Rourke - not IEI
Tulsi Gabbard - pretty woman. not so weird as SLE
Bill De Blasio - mb ILI
Michael Bennet - mb ESI

It sickens me the way the Dem establishment's favorite media outlets are already trying to sandbag Tulsi and paint her as some sort of hawkish neocon. I think it's retribution for her jumping ship to support Bernie during the 2016 primaries. I just hope she's cunning enough to sidestep their attempts to discredit her. She really is the best option in the field at this point and they're shooting themselves in the feet by trying to eliminate her.

I have little doubt the eventual nominee will make many of the same mistakes Hillary made in 2020. It's tragically funny to watch the Democrats crashing in the same car and in the same way as they did before. It's like it's happening in slow motion, like those slow-mo videos of people getting hit in the head with water balloons. For self-labelled progressives, democrats seem to be really bad at forecasting, reading the cultural tides, and tend to repeat a lot of the same mistakes they've been making for decades.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by andreasdevig

I like them too (though I wish the opt-in thing wasn't part of Yang's UBI thang), but why do you like them but not Bernie or Marianne? I see a lot of people, particularly on the right, who somehow like Gabbard and Yang yet hate on Bernie. I don't understand it.

---

I like Bernie too, but I like Yang and Gabbard more. Politically, if I was forced to choose, I am likely a centrist or left libertarian, but I have plenty of views that fall in the left or right. I also think the left/right dichotomy is simplistic and flawed and it should be taken with a grain of salt. Back in the 2016 election, I favored Sanders over Clinton. Largely because I liked his ideas, but also because he didn't seem corrupted by the political and business sphere in the way Clinton clearly was.

Sanders has some haters on the left after supporting Clinton in the 2016 election, but I don't blame him. It would of been basically political suicide to not endorse her. His haters on the right say he is too extreme on the left, but most of his policies would be center left in countries outside of the US. Also, Yang and Gabbard have many political views that are similar to Sanders that could be branded as extreme left by the right despite their differences so I agree that it is odd to like Yang and Gabbard, but dislike Sanders.

What is the reasoning behind EIE for Biden?

Bernie - Maybe LII

Tulsi Gabbard - LIE

Elizabeth Warren - FJ type.

Corey Booker - SEE

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by andreasdevig

I like them too (though I wish the opt-in thing wasn't part of Yang's UBI thang), but why do you like them but not Bernie or Marianne? I see a lot of people, particularly on the right, who somehow like Gabbard and Yang yet hate on Bernie. I don't understand it.

---

Sanders has shown that he's unwilling to go against the "establishment" Democrats on foreign policy and in recent years he's restrained his democratic socialism to something more akin to what AOC and Warren are now pushing.

The people on the right who like Gabbard and Yang are former MAGA types searching for a candidate who will actually go against the Washington political mainstream.

Trump getting re-elected would be a riot to see.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Uncle Ave

What is the reasoning behind EIE for Biden?

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiXa9RsY0kc

For starters, he is one of the most perfect embodiments of what Fe, done masterfully, can do > Fe is the "ethics of actions" and Biden changing his seat (due to being able to dynamically pick up the active emotional states within the environment) in order to sit beside Meghan McCain and warmly hold her hand as she cried, while telling a few humorous anecdotes (that altered her emotional state in making her laugh) and giving her environmentally appropriate, "tonally" sound reasons to be hopeful/optimistic about the future (as he also made this advice "open" and inclusive to the audience, subsequently creating a noticeable effect on them) was an excellent example of Fe being used to impact the emotional and social space via an expressive combination of words and gestures.

The use of Ni was evident in his generalizing/abstracting/reflecting upon past events from memory in order to articulate and evaluate what he believes is going to happen in the future, and, indirectly, what should be done in the present moment--Ni often has the intended/unintended effect of imparting patience and "stillness," from the standpoint that "we will get there, in time, so just take it easy for now." Also, though any type can use metaphors, what often distinguishes sensors from intuitives is the degree to which intuitive types prefer to use metaphorical speech when making a point or insight. Biden often says things like "her dad came after me Hammer and Tong, like we were two brothers somehow raised by different fathers or something, due to our different points of view."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Uncle Ave

Bernie - Maybe LII

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6oJ0Zh2ufw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTkkgix4bfo

Seeing as how LSEs and LIIs are "mirages," I guess LII is not too off the mark but NAH. First off, Bernie ain't an introvert--his strong, conscious 4D Te "bluntness" and unconscious 4D Se "force" comes through in the gruff, matter of fact coarseness in how he speaks and his angular, projected and pointed gesticulations (while his body remains tense). And if you fluently speak Te, his Te, ever in the form of facts/stats used towards some logical evaluation/assessment and buttressed by a fuck ton of stored 3D Si sense impression recall, should hit you like a freight train. He quickly recalls and repeats the same data, over and over and over and over again, as if on auto pilot. And he does this with the aim of finding pragmatic solutions that will systematically work for everyone. Also, Bernie does not tend to use much abstracted, metaphorical, conceptual speech; he tends to speak in a rather literal, down to earth and reality oriented fashion.

Moreover, I'm not saying this is you, but a lot of folks (particularly within an American context) seem to think that LSE politicians can't be very progressive and left leaning (which, admittedly, is often under girded by strong intuition), most likely because of the sheer volume LSEs/strong, conscious Si valuers take up among Republicans/Conservatives (probably linked to Si's predisposition towards preserving past sense experiences = being "traditional"). But, overall, LSEs often have the desire to apply their extroverted logic to some formal institution and this is frequently seen throughout the political and legal systems, in hopes of contributing to society, no matter their respective political leanings.

Also, like most who value Fi, Bernie often speaks self-referentially when imparting a specific point of view, i.e., to me, for me, I feel that, I believe, etc....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Carolus

Sanders has shown that he's unwilling to go against the "establishment" Democrats on foreign policy and in recent years he's restrained his democratic socialism to something more akin to what AOC and Warren are now pushing.

---

Do you want to elaborate on that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Finaplex

Trump getting re-elected would be a riot to see.

---

there might be riots if he's re-elected.

Bernie Sanders

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnnnext/dam...-super-169.jpg

Joe Biden

http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/2462...-721212096.jpg

Beto O'Rourke

https://www.dailywire.com/sites/defa...to_orourke.jpg

Julian Castro

https://static5.businessinsider.com/...5833276210.jpg

I've got them, as follows:

Elizabeth Warren: IEE-Ne 2w1 sp/so
Tulsi Gabbard: IEE-Ne 3w4 sp/sx
Kamala Harris: IEE-Ne 9w1 so/sp
Beta Boy O’rourke: IEE-Fi 9w1 sp/sx
Gov. Jay Inslee: LSE-Si 9w8 sp/so
Bill D’Blasio: LSE-Si 1w9 sp/so
Tim Ryan: LSE-Te 6w5 sp/so
Bernie Sanders: LSI-Ti 1w2 so/sp
Joe Biden: LSE-Si 1w2 sp/so
Pete Buttigieg: ESE-Fe 9w1 sp/so
Eric Swalwell: ESE-Si 3w2 sp/so
Amy Klobuchar: LII-Ti 1w2 sp/sx
Andrew Yang: LII-Ti 5w6 sp/so
Marianne Williamson: EII-Fi 6w7 sp/so
Cory Booker: SEE-Se 2w1 so/sp
Julian Castro: LIE-Te 3w4 sp/so
John Delaney: ILE-Ti 1w2 sp/so

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kill4Me

I've got them, as follows:

Elizabeth Warren: IEE-Ne 2w1 sp/so
Tulsi Gabbard: IEE-Ne 3w4 sp/sx
Kamala Harris: IEE-Ne 9w1 so/sp
Beta Boy O’rourke: IEE-Fi 9w1 sp/sx
Gov. Jay Inslee: LSE-Si 9w8 sp/so
Bill D’Blasio: LSE-Si 1w9 sp/so
Tim Ryan: LSE-Te 6w5 sp/so
Bernie Sanders: LSI-Ti 1w2 so/sp
Joe Biden: LSE-Si 1w2 sp/so
Pete Buttigieg: ESE-Fe 9w1 sp/so
Eric Swalwell: ESE-Si 3w2 sp/so
Amy Klobuchar: LII-Ti 1w2 sp/sx
Andrew Yang: LII-Ti 5w6 sp/so
Marianne Williamson: EII-Fi 6w7 sp/so
Cory Booker: SEE-Se 2w1 so/sp
Julian Castro: LIE-Te 3w4 sp/so
John Delaney: ILE-Ti 1w2 sp/so

---

Interesting results

Biden EIE
Sanders EII
Buttigieg IEI

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kill4Me

Andrew Yang: LII-Ti

---

he's an ILI

https://twitter.com/AndrewYang/statu...429121536?s=09

Bernie Sanders is an IEI

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by soundofconfusion

Bernie Sanders is an IEI

---

lol Sorry but this is ridiculous. So a Te MACHINE is somehow Te PoLR? I think not.

I find it interesting that people type Bernie Sanders as IEI. He has a similar smile to Pat Metheny, whom a forum member (I forget who) typed IEI. They both strike me as Ej types, though, but what do I know.

Kirsten Gillibrand - INFJ - Dostoyevsky

http://savethewest.com/wp-content/up...e-100-feat.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by andreasdevig

I find it interesting that people type Bernie Sanders as IEI. He has a similar smile to Pat Metheny, whom a forum member (I forget who) typed IEI. They both strike me as Ej types, though, but what do I know.

---

I type Sanders as ILE. Lots of public smoke and ranting, zero passed legislation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

I type Sanders as ILE. Lots of public smoke and ranting, zero passed legislation.

---

That isn’t true. He’s sponsored or co-sponsored many bills which have since become law.

I think Bernie’s LII. His wife looks Alpha SF.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FreelancePoliceman

That isn’t true. He’s sponsored or co-sponsored many bills which have since become law.

---

Three bills in 25 years. Exactly my point.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/...-record-220508

FWIW, I think Elizabeth Warren is LII.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

Three bills in 25 years. Exactly my point.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/...-record-220508

FWIW, I think Elizabeth Warren is LII.

---

As I understand, those three were bills which were only sponsored by him. He's named as the co-sponsor of over 200 other bills.

FWIW, I really doubt Warren is LII. シ

I'd guess she's Te/Fi valuing if anything.

Bernie Sanders - INFJ - Dostoyevsky

https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.c...ns-2015-24.jpg

Sometimes an angry intuitive is just an angry intuitive. Exactly what USA needs right now.

Thought he was out, and it turns out he is not. Would not have typed him otherwise.

https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/57828...ie-sanders.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by khcs

Sometimes an angry intuitive is just an angry intuitive. Exactly what USA needs right now.

Thought he was out, and it turns out he is not. Would not have typed him otherwise.

---

The media intentionally don’t report on him. Elizabeth Warren is set to be the nominee, and the DNC and MSM will collude to support her exactly as they did with Clinton. She has the advantage of being solidly right-wing, but since for some reason she’s associated with Sanders’ progressivism despite having backed out of supporting any policy to the left of Nixon, she gets the support of milquetoast yuppies who vote based on sex and image rather than policy.

The one pleasure I have is knowing that if Warren gets the nomination, she’ll be destroyed by Trump in the debates. All Trump would have to do would be to call her “Pocohantas” a few times and she’d look like an idiot the rest of the night. But I think the DNC would rather Trump win than support Sanders.

Elizabeth Warren - INFJ - Dostoyevsky

https://assets.vogue.com/photos/5891...5013785858.jpg

Pete Buttigieg

https://static.politico.com/dims4/de...ttigieg-ap.jpg

Duality Inter-type Relationship - Within cells interlinked

https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/imag...g?v=1571680711

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/10...1773984957.jpg


http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/...ung-667477.jpg

Identical Inter-type Relationship

Pete Buttigieg - ESFP - Napoleon

https://thenypost.files.wordpress.co...rip=all&w=1200

Anthony Charles Lynton Blair - ESFP - Napoleon

https://blogs.canterbury.ac.uk/discu...lair-Young.jpg

William Jefferson Clinton - ESFP - Napoleon

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-f1S8rh_IO0...B-%2BYoung.jpg

Harry S. Truman - ESFP - Napoleon

https://media.gettyimages.com/photos...re-id107927400

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kill4Me

I've got them, as follows:

Elizabeth Warren: IEE-Ne 2w1 sp/so
Tulsi Gabbard: IEE-Ne 3w4 sp/sx
Kamala Harris: IEE-Ne 9w1 so/sp
Beta Boy O’rourke: IEE-Fi 9w1 sp/sx
Gov. Jay Inslee: LSE-Si 9w8 sp/so
Bill D’Blasio: LSE-Si 1w9 sp/so
Tim Ryan: LSE-Te 6w5 sp/so
Bernie Sanders: LSI-Ti 1w2 so/sp
Joe Biden: LSE-Si 1w2 sp/so
Pete Buttigieg: ESE-Fe 9w1 sp/so
Eric Swalwell: ESE-Si 3w2 sp/so
Amy Klobuchar: LII-Ti 1w2 sp/sx
Andrew Yang: LII-Ti 5w6 sp/so
Marianne Williamson: EII-Fi 6w7 sp/so
Cory Booker: SEE-Se 2w1 so/sp
Julian Castro: LIE-Te 3w4 sp/so
John Delaney: ILE-Ti 1w2 sp/so

---

Bloomberg is LSE-Si 3w2 sp/so.

Joe Biden - EIE
Bernie Sanders - LIE
Elizabeth Warren - IEE
Kamala Harris - don't know
Pete Buttigieg - don't know
Corey Booker - don't know, probably SEE or EIE
Amy Klobuchar - don't know
Beto O'Rourke - don't know
Tulsi Gabbard - LSI-Se, smartest and sanest one out there and she's beautiful, she makes me sooooo horny. If I voted, she's who I'd vote for.
Kirstin Gillibrand - don't know
Julian Castro - don't know
Andrew Yang - don't know
Eric Swallwell - don't know
Bill De Blasio - don't know
Michael Bennet - don't know
Marianne Williamson - don't know
Michael Bloomberg - LIE-Te

FWIW, the Demonrats do seem to be STRONGLY Te/Fi valuing and against Alpha and Beta values. A lot of people see a lot of Gamma and Delta types, which makes sense. The Demonrats seem to have become especially intolerant of rebellious behavior, individuality, and individualism. They're sounding very authoritarian; I had long had suspicions in the back of my head that Sanders was militarist, and sure enough he recently mentioned that he was willing to intervene militarily against China if Taiwan was threatened. You can't have welfare without warfare and militarism and you can't have warfare without welfare. You're just never going to be that half-fortunate. You just won't. And you certainly won't ever be fully fortunate to be free of both, you're just not allowed to be. At least not in this world. Unfortunately.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...cial_photo.jpg

There's a guy running to beat Mitch McConnell in KY and he's calling turtle boy a terrorist. He's got my vote.

Michelle Obama - ENFP - Balzac

https://biografieonline.it/img/bio/Michelle_Obama_1.jpg

https://genzconservative.com/wp-cont...-biden-win.jpg

Joe Biden - ESFJ

http://cdn.thefiscaltimes.com/sites/..._Joe_Biden.jpg

Biden is about as blunt as a baseball bat. How in the 9 hells does that jackass have Fe?

Susan Rice - ESTP - Robespierre

https://affairpost.com/wp-content/up...o-737x1024.jpg

https://static.politico.com/5a/bb/93...n-rice-773.jpg



ENFJ - ESTP - Activity Inter-type Relationship


https://www.livetradingnews.com/wp-c...ty-adviser.jpg

Andrew Cuomo - INFJ - Dostoevsky

https://www.thenation.com/wp-content...and-ap-img.jpg

Cory Booker - ESFJ

https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.4mQc76...A?pid=Api&rs=1

Maxim Waters - ENTJ - Stierlitz

https://focuswashington.com/wp-conte...18/02/1-14.jpg

Jennifer Lopez - INFP

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...eral_Photo.jpg

Joseph Biden - ESFJ and Jennifer Lopez - INFP, Supervision Inter-type Relationship

https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.uGwHEi...K?pid=Api&rs=1

Kamala Harris - INFP

People seem to accept the clone of Jennifer Lopez. She may become the president one day.

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2019...isable=upscale

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by khcs

She looks like a little bit African, a little bit Indian, a little bit Asian, a little bit Latina. If you put a filter on the camera, like this photo, she even looks like a white person. It does not matter.What matters is that she is pro-migration, anti-white, against Christianity especially Catholics. Time will tell us.

---

BURN THE SCARECROW

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by khcs

She looks like a little bit African, a little bit Indian, a little bit Asian, a little bit Latina. If you put a filter on the camera, like this photo, she even looks like a white person. It does not matter.What matters is that she is pro-migration, anti-white, against Christianity especially Catholics. Time will tell us.

---

You should really look into her career as DA before making random claims of her being anti-white. If you're making your political decisions based off of religion then you need to re-evaluate your priorities, there is supposed to be a separation of church and state. But, fuck religion. (I do not base my political stance over this)

She is a creation of the system that we have built, much like Biden and Trump, and any other politician.

She's beautiful and she reminds me of my aunt (SEE-Fi). Very presidential (more so than Hillary). I don't have a strong opinion on her type. EIE for Bernie Sanders. LSE or ESE for Joe Biden. I'd have to waste time studying them more to be more sure; these are just "first impressions" (and also based on the kind of people they attract as followers and fans).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RujfQsSx4U

This is a PSA to shoot anyone who describes someone as "presidential", lest the brain worms infect you too.

Tulsi Gabbard: LSI or SEI

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019...-campaign.html

'Tulsi is a self-described introvert, an extremely quiet and obedient child grown into a woman whose job entails constant exhausting engagement. Her sister — Vrindavan to strangers, Davan to the campaign, and Davs to Tulsi — spoke for her back when they were kids, and she continues to do much of the talking for her today. When they were at a store as girls, it was Vrindavan who would interact with the cashier; Tulsi was too nervous. If the phone rang, Tulsi would wait for her sister to answer. If Vrindavan disobeyed their parents, Tulsi would be upset. “Please do your chores or our mother will have to do all of them!” Vrindavan recalls being scolded. “Our poor mother!”'

She may replace the US national anthem with a Jennifer Lopez song.

https://images.complex.com/complex/i.../kamala-harris

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FreelancePoliceman

This is a PSA to shoot anyone who describes someone as "presidential", lest the brain worms infect you too.

---

Slay, queen.

https://www.transcend.org/tms/wp-con...SideBySide.png

LSI vs. SEE

Doug Emhoff - ESFP Napoleon

https://gossip.dekhnews.com/wp-conte...8/douglas2.jpg

https://i0.wp.com/i.postimg.cc/V6mdW...ng?w=900&ssl=1

Joe Biden: LSE-Si? or ESE-Si?

Kamala Harris: SEE-Fi?

Donald Trump: SLE-Se?

Tulsi Gabbard: LSI-Ti?

Vaush: ILE-Ne?

Michael Tracey: IEI-Ni?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tO2b93O3GIs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUnMxS-ps9Q

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0jwE7PiCTk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6nrNDGzcck

Donald Trump: SLE-Se - Definitely

Kamala Harris: SEE-Fi - excellent possibility

Joe Biden: Its hard to tell with the dementia

Amy Klobuchar: SLE-Ti or LSE/SEE?

"The Anger of Amy Klobuchar: Don’t sell cruelty and pathological behavior as a feminist victory." by Caitlin Flanagan (MARCH 5, 2019): https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...s-rage/584104/

'Her problem is rage, easily uncorked, and directed not at the various forces that might thwart the needs of her constituents, but at the people—many of them young—who work for her. During Klobuchar’s first senatorial campaign, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees decried her “shameful treatment of her employees” in the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office; in March of 2018, Politico reported that she had the highest staff turnover in the Senate. But it has been the recent reporting of BuzzFeed News, HuffPost, The New York Times, and others that has provided the vivid and ugly details of what apparently lies behind those facts. Although many of the staffers and former staffers provided their reports anonymously, the senator has mostly not disputed the specifics, instead seeking to frame the behavior as part of the high expectations she has of herself and her staff.

According to BuzzFeed, Klobuchar “demeaned and berated her staff almost daily, subjecting them to bouts of explosive rage and regular humiliation within the office.” The articles quote staffers alleging that in fits of anger, she threw things—including binders—in the direction of staff members, accidentally hitting an employee on at least one occasion. The accounts of her cruelty are astonishing. She once allegedly forced an employee to say to another senator’s staffer, “I’m supposed to tell you Senator Klobuchar is late today because I am bad at my job.” For Klobuchar, the dark night of the soul arrives right on schedule: She is known to fire off scathing emails to her staff between the hours of 1 and 3 o’clock in the morning. (“In a real dark night of the soul,” wrote another unstable Minnesotan, F. Scott Fitzgerald, “it is always three o’clock in the morning.”)'


"The country laughed when Klobuchar made her presidential announcement in a near blizzard, but nothing is more respected in Minnesota than doing something in a snowstorm that could have easily been accomplished indoors. Do it during a time of profound personal embarrassment, as Klobuchar did, and you’re in Paul Bunyan territory.

As dawn must follow dusk, any unpleasant revelation about a successful woman must be immediately plumbed for any possible hint of sexism, and so it has been with the Klobuchar news. If a man threw a binder at his employees, he’d be appointed president for life, is the thinking. An American city would be renamed for him; women would compete to bear him sons; his picture would be printed on currency. Certainly a kind of sexism has accompanied the incident, and the proof is that Klobuchar seems to be surviving these reports, while a man never would."


"Amy Klobuchar's not-so-subtle troll of Hillary Clinton" (Analysis by Chris Cillizza, CNN Editor-at-large): https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/11/polit...ton/index.html

February 11, 2019: 'On Sunday, after announcing for president, Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar took questions from reporters about her 2020 plans. She was asked about her travel plans for the early days of the campaign, and said this:

"We're going to be in Iowa and Wisconsin. We're starting in Wisconsin because, as you remember, there wasn't a lot of campaigning in Wisconsin in 2016. With me, that changes. ... I'm going to be there a lot."

...If you don't get the reference, it's to this: Hillary Clinton lost Wisconsin to Donald Trump in 2016, the first Democrat to lose the Badger State since 1984. Clinton believed the state was in the bag, and didn't campaign there during the general election race. Not once.'

Joe Biden: ESE-Si (Normalizing subtype) [ESE-ESI?]

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrit...e-biden-young/

https://www.gq.com/story/joe-biden-p...aign-2016-2013

2013: '"My brother hates, hates, hates bullies," she says. "The man who pushed the girl. The guy who makes fun of you because you're fat. "Joe never appeals to the lowest common denominator. Look what's happened in our political environment. If you don't agree with me, you're a bad person. You're immoral. You want to screw with me. You're bad, bad, bad. That's the climate. And Joe—never."'

https://www.queerty.com/whos-hotter-...biden-20170305

Justin Trudeau: SEE-Se (Dominant subtype) [SEE-ESE?]

Kamala Harris: SEE-Se? (Dominant? subtype) [SEE-EIE?]

Bernie Sanders: EIE-Fe? (Dominant? subtype) [EIE-LIE?]

Yang's pretty cool btw. I still wish he had made it as the nominee, but I know winning nominations isn't about democracy when you have super-delegates and the fact that NPAs (like me) can't even vote in certain states.

He kind of made me excited about politics because he didn't talk like he was trying to win a debate or appeal to a certain group of people over another; and he didn't seem to try to appear over-confident; he just discussed things. But that's also probably why he didn't make it in the end.

I can definitely agree that he's from a democratic quadra, so LIE, LII, ILI, ILE could all be possible I suppose. My first instinct was that he was LIE way back when because he seemed kind of Ej, but I didn't ever really see Fi valuing in him, so perhaps Alpha NT fits better.

But anyway, any other opinions on Yang?

Joe Biden - ESFJ Hugo (The enthusiast)

https://laverdadnoticias.com/__expor..._318873827.png

SEI is the correct typing for Biden.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Samson

SEI is the correct typing for Biden.

---

https://media1.tenor.com/images/5c56...temid=14257370

Chuck Shumer - ISFP Dumas

https://media.breitbart.com/media/20...TA-640x480.jpg

Joe Biden - ESFJ Hugo

https://images.impresa.pt/sicnot/202...-Biden-3/fb/wm




https://i.ytimg.com/vi/igye5RnPgw4/maxresdefault.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by khcs

https://media1.tenor.com/images/5c56...temid=14257370

Chuck Shumer - ISFP Dumas

https://media.breitbart.com/media/20...TA-640x480.jpg

Joe Biden - ESFJ Hugo

https://images.impresa.pt/sicnot/202...-Biden-3/fb/wm




https://i.ytimg.com/vi/igye5RnPgw4/maxresdefault.jpg

---

That post is void of argument or reason. You mention "discussion" in your signature but your posting history is ironically marked by the exact lack of such. If you cannot or will not substantiate your typing in order to have a proper discussion (I am willing to provide substance to my own typing of Biden), then I ask you to refrain from responding to me. Photo-spam without further explanations will be ignored. If, however, you are willing to engage with depth, then feel free to do so.

Note the differences between LSI-Se Tulsi Gabbard and LSI-Ti Hillary Clinton... Tulsi is more relaxed, has more hobbies, is more beautiful and more willing to challenge the status quo. She's also more articulate and has more original ideas and is more in touch with reality.

Antony Blinken - ENFJ Hamlet

https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.4b-p8N...id=ImgDet&rs=1

Victoria Nuland - ESTP Robespierre

https://cdn5.img.sputniknews.com/ima...1020801831.jpg

Jen Psaki - ISTJ Dreiser

https://cdn1.img.sputniknews.com/img...ff978f81ba.jpg

Biden - ESE
Kamala - LIE
Klob - LSE
Bloomberg - ILI
Kirsten Gillibrand - SEI
Buttigieg - LIE (less sure about this one)