HAGVIDEO

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-28-2018, 07:00 PM
hag

HAGVIDEO

.
10-28-2018, 07:12 PM
Anglas

lol
10-28-2018, 07:13 PM
Cosmic Teapot

useless comment passing by: you remind me of Kristen Stewart

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1-dYbDRjiU
don't bite me
10-28-2018, 09:13 PM
Tallmo

sound would be very nice
10-28-2018, 09:20 PM
WinnieW

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tallmo

sound would be very nice

...or we need a skilled lip-reader. Where is the nearest HAL 9000 computer? :rolleyes:

This could pass as ASMR video carried to the extremes. :shifty:
10-28-2018, 09:49 PM
Sanguine Miasma

I kind of doubt Ijness. Seriously. It is hard to say...
10-28-2018, 10:07 PM
Sol

seems *IE
10-28-2018, 10:54 PM
Kiba

EII imo
10-28-2018, 10:57 PM
Adam Strange

I'm thinking ILI or EIE, leaning more EIE. I know those types are very different, but hag is a mystery to me.

Maybe sound would add enough info to narrow things down. The Kristen Stewart vid was interesting because she seems mostly ILI while ESI comes through pretty clearly sometimes (at 0:07).

I need to review hag's intro typing page, if she made one.
10-29-2018, 12:36 AM
Desert Financial

ILI imo

You seem like Kirsten Stewart but more off in the clouds and imaginative.
10-29-2018, 12:45 AM
Desert Financial

@hag you remind me a hell of a lot like an Ni lead I knew from another forum. So much so that I wondered if you were them when I saw your profile here.

Usually I write items like this off as irrelevant, but it really takes a particular kind of person to create a mixture like Bush Did 9/11 / San Andreas / Mexican carwash profile.
10-29-2018, 12:54 AM
Kiba

don't listen to them hag...they are all bad typers. They type girls they like as their duals, so don't listen to them.
10-29-2018, 12:57 AM
Desert Financial

Don't listen to Aki. I can type 70+ words a minute.
10-29-2018, 01:17 AM
Cosmic Teapot

I think this girl is ILI - maybe you hear something that you find relatable

https://youtu.be/6r8qKLYQTXk
10-29-2018, 01:26 AM
Kiba

No she's not. This one is INTP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUY09JJ3he0
10-29-2018, 01:37 AM
Desert Financial

Quote:

Originally Posted by hag

@A Mod huh, ok. that's funny, imaginative is not how I would describe myself. would say my imagination is pretty lacking these days actually. next to the IEEs I've known I feel like such a square lol. they're always wanting to talk about wild new ideas basically, most of which ime don't come to fruition or get dropped quickly for something else, they rather use me like a sounding board. and sometimes they'll be like "your thoughts?" and I'm like, well, idk, I just don't have much to say about this unless we're going to make some actual plans. don't feel like I can rely on them really, IEE strikes me as uncomfortably distractable. for instance I notice they don't seem to be paying too much attention to their surroundings at times, completely missing things, almost like they're on autopilot.

It seems like you value Se (physical competence and "paying attention") in people, and you also care about looking into the implications of plans and ideas, like Ni valuers.
10-29-2018, 01:41 AM
Kiba

Hag, listen to them, you are ILI. I was just trolling.
10-29-2018, 01:46 AM
Desert Financial

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aki

Hag, listen to them, you are ILI. I was just trolling.

:char::wine::cat:
10-29-2018, 01:48 AM
Kiba

Also they never type girls they like as duals. So you can trust them. They are reliable.
10-29-2018, 01:50 AM
Desert Financial

Quote:

Originally Posted by hag

kewl, guess I will start being into ILI things now, like uh time and all that business. everything has already happened, existence is futile, &etc.

https://i.etsystatic.com/6502817/r/i...30885_97tm.jpg

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...tar8553_59.gif
10-29-2018, 02:12 AM
Desert Financial

:hellokitty:
10-29-2018, 02:36 AM
Starvish

Do you have anything else that could record your voice? I think even just some really shitty phone feature to get a clip of your general tone of voice could work.
10-29-2018, 03:49 AM
Sol

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aki

Also they never type girls they like as duals. So you can trust them. They are reliable.

To trust in reliably wrong typing as "never type girls they like as duals" means to act opposite IR theory. While MBTI followers miss the useful IR theory to type better, besides issues with the theory.
The wish to ignore IR theory follows from the lack of noticing its efficiency due to lack of typing skills.

> This one is INTP

E or F is more possible as smiles too much
10-29-2018, 04:06 AM
Desert Financial

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sol

to trust in reliably wrong typing

LSE
10-29-2018, 04:25 AM
Kiba

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sol

To trust in reliably wrong typing as "never type girls they like as duals" means to act opposite IR theory.
The wish to ignore IR theory follows from the lack of noticing its efficiency due to lack of typing skills.

> This one is INTP

E or F is more possible as smiles too much

To trust wrong typing means the wish to ignore skills to type in reliability act opposite its efficiency due lack of typing skills. IR theory follows never type girls they like as duels from the lack of noticing.

L or I too much lesser possible as smiles not.
10-29-2018, 04:30 AM
Sol

@Aki
not anyone in glasses has T type
10-29-2018, 04:32 AM
Kiba

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sol

@Aki
not anyone in glasses has T type

not anyone who smiles has not T type
10-29-2018, 06:45 AM
Sanguine Miasma

Avatar is pure ESIness in action but video is not. :lol:

Anyways EIE and ESI mirages of the same person

https://i.imgur.com/RC34CDB.jpg
10-29-2018, 12:19 PM
Kalinoche buenanoche

hag r u a water sign?
10-29-2018, 01:53 PM
Aster

@hag. Question :)

You do look around a lot while talking. Hardly ever looking at the camera. Maybe this is an intuitive thing? Do you usually look around that much, or were you kind of nervous looking at the camera? Just wondering if this your 'norm'? If so, I would think this might lean towards you being more intuitive.
10-29-2018, 01:56 PM
Skepsis

Hag is code for Bag, which is bags under your eyes. Dark circles under eyes=ILI.

MVIGA!
10-29-2018, 02:29 PM
sbbds

@hag Your eyes are amazing!! Good to see those again. I also like how you blink. It’s very frequent, so your eyes must be nice ‘n moist <o>

More seriously, the fact that you never look directly at the camera is a big pointer towards Se polr. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that of course, but let’s be real. @aster noticed that as well, apparently. I do not have a clue what other people are talking about when they say it seems like you value Se.
10-29-2018, 02:54 PM
Adam Strange

^The reason I suggested ILI or EIE is I think I see Ni Victimness.
10-29-2018, 03:12 PM
Ryan

Quote:

Originally Posted by sbbds

@hag Your eyes are amazing!! Good to see those again. I also like how you blink. It’s very frequent, so your eyes must be nice ‘n moist <o>

More seriously, the fact that you never look directly at the camera is a big pointer towards Se polr. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that of course, but let’s be real. @aster noticed that as well, apparently. I do not have a clue what other people are talking about when they say it seems like you value Se.

what kind of weak reasoning is that
10-29-2018, 03:17 PM
Kiba

Quote:

Originally Posted by sbbds

@hag Your eyes are amazing!! Good to see those again. I also like how you blink. It’s very frequent, so your eyes must be nice ‘n moist <o>

Yes she has the coolest eyes ever
10-29-2018, 03:18 PM
sbbds

Quote:

Originally Posted by COOL AND MANLY

what kind of weak reasoning is that

Is there a problem with it? If so what? If you’re being sarcastic, I can’t really tell lol.

Or are you just trying to bait me for the lulz as people often like to do?
10-29-2018, 03:21 PM
Kiba

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

^The reason I suggested ILI or EIE is I think I see Ni Victimness.

Se PoLR is not Ni victimness. Its xII.
10-29-2018, 03:25 PM
Adam Strange

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aki

Se PoLR is not Ni victimness. Its xII.

Whatever. I still think I see Victimness.
10-29-2018, 03:26 PM
sbbds

Even an ILI would show more Se/directness than that (hag in this video).
10-29-2018, 03:27 PM
sbbds

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

Whatever. I still think I see Victimness.

Can you describe the Victimness that you saw?
10-29-2018, 03:31 PM
Ryan

Quote:

Originally Posted by sbbds

Is there a problem with it? If so what? If you’re being sarcastic, I can’t really tell lol.

No, I'm serious. I don't really rate VI at all. But it's been years since I've heard such stereotypical nonsense that has no basis in Socionics.
10-29-2018, 03:35 PM
sbbds

Quote:

Originally Posted by COOL AND MANLY

No, I'm serious. I don't really rate VI at all. But it's been years since I've heard such stereotypical nonsense that has no basis in Socionics.

How does it have no basis? Se is force sensorics and directness lol. Socionics literature uses these terms always in describing Se, and xII are always described as gentle and indirect. xIIs abhor and do not generate or respond (well) to force and directness. How would you expect to see Se in body language then if not this way?
10-29-2018, 03:36 PM
WinnieW

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aki

Se PoLR is not Ni victimness. Its xII.

Are you talking about Socionics romance styles?
xII is categorized as infantile / childlike – because of :Ne: in the ego block

Types with :Ni: in the ego block are categorized as victim.
10-29-2018, 03:37 PM
Number 9 large

SLI 1w2
10-29-2018, 03:41 PM
Kiba

Quote:

Originally Posted by WinnieW

Are you talking about Socionics romance styles?
xII is categorized as infantile / childlike – because of :Ne: in the ego block

Types with :Ni: in the ego block are categorized as victim.

Yes. And now I'm going to let you re read the conversation to understand it better for your own.
10-29-2018, 03:43 PM
Kiba

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

Whatever. I still think I see Victimness.

You think you see a lot
10-29-2018, 03:44 PM
Ryan

Quote:

Originally Posted by sbbds

How does it have no basis? Se is force sensorics and directness lol. Socionics literature uses these terms always in describing Se, and xII are always described as gentle and indirect. How would you expect to see Se in body language then if not this way?

Like I said, I don't rate VI. But if we assume your logic is true, which is isn't, then all N-types would behave similarly. It doesn't explain why you think it's a Se-polr trait in particular.

You are making a huge leap.
10-29-2018, 03:45 PM
WinnieW

Quote:

Originally Posted by sbbds

xII are always described as gentle and indirect.

Most of the time, yes... but if I speak for myself I behave this way not all the time.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sbbds

xIIs abhor and do not generate or respond (well) to force and directness.

If I see a reason for I do respond well to force.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aki

And now I'm going to let you re read the conversation to understand it better for your own.

Ok, but I'm not that good at typing somebody from VI alone, I need to hear the emotional expressions in the voice of a person to form a conclusion.
10-29-2018, 03:51 PM
Ryan

I wouldn't describe LII as gentle or indirect too. That doesn't even sound like Se-polr. It sounds like a feeling type description.
10-29-2018, 03:52 PM
Sol

Quote:

Originally Posted by COOL AND MANLY

I don't really rate VI at all.

Then you don't rate objective reality as VI experimentally proved (in my experiment about which I said here many times) to be useful for typing, giving the typing matches higher than random and close to other methods. With better skills in it its use is easier to notice. Also you ignore original Socionics texts where impressions from nonverbal are mentioned as important. And ignore IR theory as it works through nonverbal too, what should be evident from the texts.
Those who reject VI - reject it irrationally and heretically. Mostly because having issues with noticing the corresponded impressions from nonverbal due to own lame typings and magical and heretical believes that intuition can't give correct information and only "smart words" reasonings may give the truth.

Quote:

Originally Posted by COOL AND MANLY

I wouldn't describe LII as gentle or indirect too.

N types are gentle in the perception of S types, at least.
Also having better imagination N types may choose lesser evident and direct ways to influence, to be more creative in overcoming possible opposing. S types having better will act more directly, in general.

> It sounds like a feeling type description.

in case "gentle" was related to emotions, what is not obligately
10-29-2018, 03:54 PM
sbbds

Quote:

Originally Posted by COOL AND MANLY

Like I said, I don't rate VI. But if we assume your logic is true, which is isn't, then all N-types would behave similarly. It doesn't explain why you think it's a Se-polr trait in particular.

You are making a huge leap

I added this to my post while you were responding:

”xIIs abhor and do not generate or respond (well) to force and directness.”

Meanwhile, Ni lead types would be more unconsciously direct and attached than Ni polrs, showing more direct eye contact and directed forceful movements for instance. Ni creative people would use direct force and contact often, unconsciously, but with less fine motor proficiency (Si polr).

Yes, all N types should have similar body language in the sense of not being strongly involved/present in their environments. That’s definitely a part of Socionics literature, so I’m not sure what you’re talking about. You don’t think this is the case I guess? But you don’t put stock in VI anyway apparently, so I’m not sure how you’re expecting your opinion in this discussion to be taken seriously, or why you’re putting energy into entering it.
10-29-2018, 03:55 PM
sbbds

Quote:

Originally Posted by COOL AND MANLY

I wouldn't describe LII as gentle or indirect too. That doesn't even sound like Se-polr. It sounds like a feeling type description.

Apply gentle and indirect to physical movements.
10-29-2018, 03:59 PM
Skepsis

It is impossible to tell the difference between Se-polr and general weak Se, and furthermore between weak Se/Se seeking and weak Se/ignoring,demonstrative, with such limited information. SLI or SEI aren't Se valuing and can be considered Se "weak", but not polr.

I suggest a new video with some Se thrown in, like with some lions or tigers, or trump, or some shit.
10-29-2018, 04:07 PM
sbbds

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nebula

It is impossible to tell the difference between Se-polr and general weak Se, and furthermore between weak Se/Se seeking and weak Se/ignoring,demonstrative, with such limited information. SLI or SEI aren't Se valuing and can be considered Se "weak", but not polr.

I suggest a new video with some Se thrown in, like with some lions or tigers, or trump, or some shit.

I think to say it’s impossible is exaggerating a lot, but obviously more information is always better. I’ve interacted with hag quite a bit and have known her for a while now. While she’s great, she’s also quite obviously Ne valuing to anybody who’s talked to her or even just seen her shoutbox posts, and I’m pretty sure her demonstrative Ni could bend spoons and enter God’s lifestream and unconsciously pre-emptively deflect tigers and lions from reaching her vicinity. Just my 2cents.
10-29-2018, 04:11 PM
Ryan

Quote:

Originally Posted by sbbds

Apply gentle and indirect to physical movements.

Okay, now this is amusing to think about.

http://media.tumblr.com/0598d7ac7418...yWL1qz4rgp.gif

https://oddstuffmagazine.com/wp-cont...2ae58421e1.gif

http://37.media.tumblr.com/c48987990...e1eio1_400.gif

http://25.media.tumblr.com/bd5513837...0vnoo1_250.gif
10-29-2018, 04:17 PM
Skepsis

Quote:

Originally Posted by sbbds

I think to say it’s impossible is exaggerating a lot, but obviously more information is always better. I’ve interacted with hag quite a bit and have known her for a while now. While she’s great, she’s also quite obviously Ne valuing to anybody who’s talked to her or even just seen her shoutbox posts, and I’m pretty sure her demonstrative Ni could bend spoons and enter God’s lifestream and unconsciously pre-emptively deflect tigers and lions from reaching her vicinity. Just my 2cents.

I just consulted the crystal ball I purchased for $49.99 from an obscure socionics practitioner. Jung answered and he said that he finds V.I. dubious and subject to misuse, he does agree that more information is needed to type.

Impossible wasn't the best choice of words. I didn't mean to exaggerate. Inconclusive would have been better, due to the lack of information available.

But, if you had more interactions, you have more info to base your conclusions on.
10-29-2018, 04:22 PM
Sol

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aki

So, trusting my guts led me to get EII, LII, ILE, LSE friends and IEE partner. So I trust me, you are EII.

There are several types which are expected to give positive impression.
In case you'd be SLI. The conflictors (EIE possibility) may attract on the distance too. Orderer (LII) is not good for friendly relations what ruins your argument, though those people may to have other types easily.

it's clear, that her type is not EII
compare her with EII examples of bloggers, instead of senseless reasonings
10-29-2018, 04:27 PM
Sol

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nebula

I just consulted the crystal ball I purchased for $49.99 from an obscure socionics practitioner. Jung answered and he said that he finds V.I. dubious and subject to misuse, he does agree that more information is needed to type.

it was broken crystal ball and so you were connected with !%!@%^@ [missed due to accidental Russian hackers activity]
10-29-2018, 04:31 PM
sbbds

@Sol Have you ever considered just writing your posts in original Russian and letting other people run them through translate apps or browser functions themselves? Just a thought I had.
10-29-2018, 04:34 PM
Kiba

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sol

There are several types which are expected to give positive impression.
In case you'd be SLI. The conflictors (EIE possibility) may attract on the distance too. Orderer (LII) is not good for friendly relations what ruins your argument, though those people may to have other types easily.

it's clear, that her type is not EII
compare her with EII examples of bloggers, instead of senseless reasonings

Which is clear is that you will never get dualized.
10-29-2018, 04:36 PM
Sol

Quote:

Originally Posted by hag

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/13...g?v=1489536582

http://www.facade.com/tarot/personal...Reading=single

Se valued type :)
10-29-2018, 04:41 PM
Sol

Quote:

Originally Posted by sbbds

Have you ever considered just writing your posts in original Russian and letting other people run them through translate apps or browser functions themselves? Just a thought I had.

The ones who want my messages in Russian may translate to it by a translator.

Just a thought I had. (after staying for some time near Aki and the smoke from her helmet)
10-29-2018, 05:04 PM
sbbds

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sol

The ones who want my messages in Russian may translate to it by a translator.

Just a thought I had. (after staying for some time near Aki and the smoke from her helmet)

: P
10-29-2018, 06:01 PM
Skepsis

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sol

it was broken crystal ball and so you were connected with !%!@%^@ [missed due to accidental Russian hackers activity]

As was rumored, but that turned out to be fake news.
10-29-2018, 06:05 PM
Skepsis

Quote:

Originally Posted by sbbds

I added this to my post while you were responding:

”xIIs abhor and do not generate or respond (well) to force and directness.”

Meanwhile, Ni lead types would be more unconsciously direct and attached than Ni polrs, showing more direct eye contact and directed forceful movements for instance. Ni creative people would use direct force and contact often, unconsciously, but with less fine motor proficiency (Si polr).

Yes, all N types should have similar body language in the sense of not being strongly involved/present in their environments. That’s definitely a part of Socionics literature, so I’m not sure what you’re talking about. You don’t think this is the case I guess? But you don’t put stock in VI anyway apparently, so I’m not sure how you’re expecting your opinion in this discussion to be taken seriously, or why you’re putting energy into entering it.

How would you empirically differentiate then between Ni using direct force and Se dominant or creative, when Ni itself stands as the equal but opposite of direct force, or Se? How do you move past such contradictions?
10-29-2018, 06:11 PM
Kiba

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nebula

It is impossible to tell the difference between Se-polr and general weak Se, and furthermore between weak Se/Se seeking and weak Se/ignoring,demonstrative, with such limited information. SLI or SEI aren't Se valuing and can be considered Se "weak", but not polr.

I suggest a new video with some Se thrown in, like with some lions or tigers, or trump, or some shit.

heresy.
10-29-2018, 06:16 PM
Kiba

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nebula

How would you empirically differentiate then between Ni using direct force and Se dominant or creative, when Ni itself stands as the equal but opposite if direct force, or Se? How do you move past such contradictions?

you are blinded by your own 1DSe and helpless Ni so it makes impossible for you to distinguish your head from your butt (it means you can't distinguish the differences in Se correctly because yours is 1D)

:hellokitty:
10-29-2018, 06:20 PM
Skepsis

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aki

you are blinded for your own 1DSe and helpless Ni so it makes impossible for you to distinguish your head from your butt (it means you can't distinguish the differences in Se correctly because yours is 1D)

:hellokitty:

You may have a good point. I do look endlessly for something that is right under nose.
10-29-2018, 06:23 PM
Kiba

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nebula

You may have a good point. I do look endlessly for something that is right under nose.

enlightenment from the russian gods is near you now not lesser. Your destiny must you accept no more.
10-29-2018, 06:39 PM
Skepsis

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aki

enlightenment from the russian gods is near you now not lesser. Your destiny must you accept no more.

which is Vodka of the blue sky. Christ will be pissed(while Russians are pissing).
10-29-2018, 06:42 PM
Skepsis

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aki

you are blinded for your own 1DSe and helpless Ni so it makes impossible for you to distinguish your head from your butt (it means you can't distinguish the differences in Se correctly because yours is 1D)

:hellokitty:

It becomes even more confusing when one's breath smells like ass. Haha
10-29-2018, 06:44 PM
FDG

ili or sli
10-29-2018, 07:15 PM
sbbds

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nebula

How would you empirically differentiate then between Ni using direct force and Se dominant or creative, when Ni itself stands as the equal but opposite of direct force, or Se? How do you move past such contradictions?

I love the way that you think! I agree that in some cases it gets really ambiguous. I think the bottom line is supposed to be that Se for an Se ego is conscious, physical and highly controlled. Se for an Ni ego is still physical, but it is unconscious (being in the Super-Id), and highly uncontrolled.
10-29-2018, 07:41 PM
Number 9 large

I guess ESI a also possible. Do u relate more to 4 or 1?
10-29-2018, 08:25 PM
Capitalist Pig

next time record audio from a separate source, and sync tracks in a video editor like Lightworks (which is free) :thumbsup:

altho tbh it's probably just easier to troubleshoot your issue starting w/ your audio input settings and doing some tests w/ different configurations to see what works. more than likely the audio source was set to either an unused device, or the device setting was correct but the mic itself broken, or who knows. hard to say w/o knowing how it was recorded
10-29-2018, 08:35 PM
Adam Strange

Quote:

Originally Posted by hag

tfw your dual doesn't even recognize you as their dual

https://imgur.com/uxA4EPq.gif

Lol. The truth is, I think you look pretty hot, and since that happens almost never with my duals, I assume you are some other type. Maybe the hotness is because you are close to my Imago, or it’s one fire sign (Aries) to another (Leo), IDK. I just didn’t see any of the micro-expressions in your video that I associate with ESI’s. Could be that you are ESI and I’m just working from a very limited base.
I will say that your writing often seems ESI, but not always.

I still should review your typing questionnaire, if you made one.
10-29-2018, 08:36 PM
golden

https://webcammictest.com/check-microphone.html
10-30-2018, 12:48 AM
Adam Strange

Quote:

Originally Posted by hag

@Number 9 large idk, I relate to both. I type myself 9w1 with 4 in my tritype

typing questionnaire? do you mean this? http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...do=form&fid=16

@hag, yes, except one where you've filled out your answers. :)
10-30-2018, 06:59 AM
Number 9 large

Quote:

Originally Posted by hag

@Number 9 large idk, I relate to both. I type myself 9w1 with 4 in my tritype

typing questionnaire? do you mean this? http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...do=form&fid=16

Well, you did seem like a 4w3 to me based on your posts and for example, taste in music
10-31-2018, 01:21 PM
Sanguine Miasma

SLI could be it. And yes, Ni is body wide botox shot state.
11-02-2018, 09:19 AM
Hays

a Pity sound wasn’t available in your video however from body language/facial use I agreed with the suggestion of being similar to Kristen Stewart and also think a bit like Elisabeth Shue.
Both could be gamma SF.
11-02-2018, 10:19 PM
timber

So you weren't talking you were pantomiming? Why?
11-02-2018, 10:24 PM
Danali

you give me "the weird girl" vibe.
11-03-2018, 01:22 AM
timber

Looked acted.
11-04-2018, 06:15 AM
Blue

Ha I saw the Kristen Stewart resemblance too, but then her mannerisms reminded me of the singer Aurora, who I think is a EII 4 so I'll go with that.:shrug:
11-04-2018, 08:58 AM
SaveYourself

Quote:

Originally Posted by hag

@kalinoche fire sign :) leo
but, according to sidereal zodiac I should be cancer?

@aster well, the camera is not someone's face, don't feel the need to look at it so much, it's just kinda 'there'. idt my eyes jump around that much 1-1, but, wouldn't really know?

I found this interesting because I did exactly the opposite with my video. I automatically got into the mindset that I was talking to someone watching the video rather than talking to the camera. I was very aware of the fact that I was told to make a 30-60 minute video and that watching people talk about themselves for that long would be boring so I tried to keep it lively.

Idk if this is Fe valuing vs. not, but it jumped out as a major difference between our approach to video making. I don't think you were considering an Fe type but it was suggested a couple of times in this thread so I figured it was worth mentioning :)
11-08-2018, 11:07 PM
Cosmic Teapot

@hag you vibe a bit ike lana del rey - but I don't know her type. Some say ILI or so

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw2wg_GK1-c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-Iv9yXl0Tw
11-08-2018, 11:43 PM
Desert Financial

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cosmic Teapot

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw2wg_GK1-c

The likeness in vibe is real.
11-13-2018, 07:36 PM
Hamada

Istj/ LSI.
11-23-2018, 11:00 PM
Reyne

Eye movement pretty similar to mine (yours is less hyperactive). You also look more expressive and more structured and got a more dreamy look. And you talk faster for sure, lol. Simply based on the eye movement I would say we're on the same perceptive axis.
11-25-2018, 11:06 AM
Number 9 large

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cosmic Teapot

@hag you vibe a bit ike lana del rey - but I don't know her type. Some say ILI or so

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw2wg_GK1-c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-Iv9yXl0Tw

Obvious ethical type not ILI.

Compare to jordan peterson who actually IS ILI
11-25-2018, 01:07 PM
Cosmic Teapot

Quote:

Originally Posted by Number 9 large

Obvious ethical type not ILI.

Compare to jordan peterson who actually IS ILI

Peterson is a drama queen. An intelligent drama queen but not ILI
12-18-2018, 05:15 AM
VenusRose

I would say 74x perhaps, for enneagram.
12-18-2018, 05:27 AM
Raver

@hag Based off of the video, I still think you are EII, likely Fi subtype and I got intuitive vibes from you for sure. However, I am not completely certain on your type though due to no sound.
12-18-2018, 05:33 AM
PussyInASarcophagus

Quote:

Originally Posted by hag

the audio doesn't work, sorry. phone mic is probably broke, sound is all ??? + fuzzy, tried troubleshooting but nothing helped :(. hopefully you can still get something from it

>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/cz716i5uk5...%20PM.mov?dl=0 <<

@hag 2 @Sol

Kinda reminds me of Julianne Moore.
12-18-2018, 06:35 PM
vesstheastralsilky

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karatos

ILI imo

You seem like Kirsten Stewart but more off in the clouds and imaginative.

Very astute.
12-18-2018, 06:36 PM
vesstheastralsilky

ILI !

<3

very confidant about this typing
12-18-2018, 06:41 PM
vesstheastralsilky

Quote:

Originally Posted by Number 9 large

I guess ESI a also possible. Do u relate more to 4 or 1?

No ESI & ILI are VERY different.
12-27-2018, 06:09 PM
summerprincess

ILI. You don't rly remind me of Lana Del Rey I think she uses a lot more Se
12-27-2018, 06:46 PM
Number 9 large

Quote:

Originally Posted by summerprincess

ILI. You don't rly remind me of Lana Del Rey I think she uses a lot more Se

yeah she looks like jordan peterson

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:04 PM.

Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.2.3 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Username Changing provided by Username Change v1.3.1 (Free) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.