I also made a twin thread, Ethics Problems.
Post ST and NT type struggles in here. Pictures, videos/music, quotes, articles, your own stories, everything you can think of. Let's go!
https://78.media.tumblr.com/5d1d63dd...3a1jo1_500.jpg
Printable View
I also made a twin thread, Ethics Problems.
Post ST and NT type struggles in here. Pictures, videos/music, quotes, articles, your own stories, everything you can think of. Let's go!
https://78.media.tumblr.com/5d1d63dd...3a1jo1_500.jpg
I realized that complexity of the universe – even though someone could compress everything into one equation – means that resources to remodel everything back to current state would probably be too taxing and unrealistic. What a bummer and would generate whole host problems regarding ethical stuff. Which in turn also means that when we continue our lives generates itself whole host of future problems as from top down perspective we could live in a simulation which (even without that) means that we live in a lab while we test ourselves which in turn sets politically set up research ethics highly questionable.
I know that large amount of people can not follow me at all.
That quote makes me think of LII. I have always seen science as safe haven from those issues because people are people and history repeats itself. Actually problems that can help with it is stability generation where people do not have to fight for scarce resources. It is essentially problem of seeing ahead and setting besides your own needs. Since living organism do not do that when conditions are less than ideal it only gives us near extinction or progress that could satisfy itself. Then becomes problem of needing to be productive (for certain individuals) as too much of progress sets things unbalanced and greed comes significant part of the equation.