What are your Socionics skills?
Updated poll. Please vote!
Printable View
What are your Socionics skills?
Updated poll. Please vote!
Socionics theory is limited by model A and Jung. The other is wannabe-Socionics.
Aspects are 8 functions. Static/dynamic are Reinin's traits.
> Typing from palm of hand
only by other body parts
> Advanced VI
you've forgotten to mention also: super supreme advanced extended expanded ultra VI
Menton pregle su expetted ir ademble co whipesham. Qu berager lo marved menton. Insions tra fathroserty resurious. Surric e trantic tra poincephedle firist.
:love::love::love::love::love::love::love::love::l ove::love::love::love::love::love::love::love::lov e::love::love::love::love::love::love::love::love: :love::love::love::love::love::love::love::love::l ove::love::love::love::love::love::love::love::lov e::love::love::love::love::love::love::love::love: :love::love::love::love:
Voted for palm typing skill, my new favorite method to show off. Palm enthusiasts, where you at? I love it. Socionics just got super sexy :oops:
:love::love::love::love::love::love::love::love::l ove::love::love::love::love::love::love::love::lov e::love::love::love::love::love::love::love::love: :love::love::love::love::love::love::love::love::l ove::love::love::love::love::love::love::love::lov e::love::love::love::love::love::love::love::love: :love::love::love::love:
I voted but my actual skills are a bit rusty. Sweet idea @Tallmo :)
"Advanced VI"
lol
@Tallmo it's seems like only "I read russian" is missing haha. The ones who know russian probably left and didn't think of coming back because they reached that next level.
The purist. It is funny because it is like there exists extra layer on top of original stuff. :coffee:
Stress types aint there and learning russian so fun :)
Great thread start!
I don't know anyone in the community who has become fluent in Russian and then applied it to socionics, aside from Rick and the native-speakers like Lytov, Olga, etc.
I've considered trying it but I've only seen a very small amount of current Russian material that has informed my view of socionics at all -- a few ideas from Model G in particular. I like SSS and Churumov for their ambition but have had more difficulty finding a meaningful way to incorporate their ideas.
Machine translation is getting better and better and the most insightful Russian stuff was written 20-35 years ago and already partly translated by Rick. I honestly think they could learn more from us than vice versa.
allyourvillagearenowbelongtome
other: I'm not good at socionics
Phrenology & physiognomy
Palm of hand and wrinkle tracking, like all the good typers do.
Except also Russian books on energy meridians
I clicked Model A and DCNH
- Model A I know the basics
- Aspects (static/dynamic etc.) I should have written "IE dichotomies". Anyway, this is very interesting. I sometimes use static/dynamic to type people, and maybe object/field (intro-/extrovert), but not external/internal, it would be fun to learn that too (or maybe I do but am not aware of it)
- Reinin dichotomies Not really, I understand it is Socionics-turned-upside-down, but I haven't really looked into it.
- Model B (plus/minus) I still don't get it.
- Model G No
- Communication styles I can relate to them
- Romance styles I can relate to them
- Cognitive styles I can relate to "dialectical-algorithmic", and it sounds cool too
- Energy model Is this the future of Socionics?
- 2 subtype system Never understood it
- DCNH subtypes Yes, all the time
- Small groups Would be interesting. I've understood they have expanded it a lot way beyond quadra and clubs. One can construct all kinds of small groups.
- Jung (Psychological types, the book) Should definitely be read. Much easier to understand with Socionics in mind.
- I read Russian No
- Advanced VI Not really. I can sometimes type people really fast though
- Typing from palm of hand Would be a nice trick in a bar, breaking the ice
- Other, what? Can't think of anything, Ne problems
I realized recently that my first inclinations in meeting people is to look for commonalities and I seem to do this even when I'm trying to type people so usually start by assuming they're in or neighbouring quadra. I think it has showed poor results, so maybe i'll now start by first checking off the opposing/ other quadras as a measure of safety lol. Only partially related to the OP.
how does one type by romance styles? :lol: slide into DMs and try romancing them?
advanced VI in application :lol:
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...s-and-Raccoons
*** BUMP ***
Please do the poll if you haven't already