@mrrrmaid
newcommer with a video. add, pls
Printable View
@mrrrmaid
newcommer with a video. add, pls
@silke: you use some additional letters in your enneagram typings... e.g. "im so/sx" and "rea sx/sp". what do they stand for? i guess, rea = reactive (triad)?
Please add me, @Director Abbie
Sorry, I'm desperately trying to figure it out, but my phone is refusing to do so.
@Director Abbie , please could you add me? It's not letting me add anything. Do I need a PW or something now that some time has gone by since this was introduced?
Thanks.
4 people voted some sort of gamma SF for me :D . My Se is absolutely nonexistent, how can people see me as gamma SF? This is really a mystery for me, unless those people were just joking.
LOL :lol:
BTW: I do not type myself anything anymore. There are people here who think I'm an IEI and that's fine. Then there're those who don't think so and that's fine with me too. I'm just absolutely sure I'm not gamma and my Se is very weak. Hell place into any other quadra, but gamma is the biggest NO for me.
@Director Abbie
I would like to join as well. :)
Being interested in clothes and shoes doesnt imply sensing or SF at all, not even remotely.
The thing that you dont express Se doesnt mean you dont have such personality.
@Kara and @MrsTortilla, you've been added. Sorry for the delay.
That’s ok! Thanks!
Everyone that types me anything other than my selftyping are basement dwelling masturbators and incels. I've offered the same amount of evidence for my claim as they have.
I am talking to olimpia and eko, ofc.
youre not wrong
You are wrong about me, though :shrug:
Your disproportionate reactiveness is getting tiresome. How is it being upset and butthurt all the time? Seems exhausting.
It is just a typing, calm yo ballz. :p
Btw, whenever someone gets so upset about a typing, it just makes it seem even more like there could be truth to it.
Because, if it was really so absurd or besides the mark, why would you be upset about it? You would shrug and not take it seriously.
But it hits a nerve. For a good reason, usually.
@Director Abbie May I please be added? I want to be crucified by the masses, too :oops:
(@strangeling haha, good one)
Cuz I'm not one of your dancing monkeys? I dont give a fuck what you think tbh, also. See the following post.
You're nailing the amature use of psychology Oli. Also, dont assume that I am upset for calling you out on your bullshit.
I think it has more to do with the fact that others projecting an image of yourself unto you is annoying, and makes you feel llike you have to fit their vision of you.
Or at least, it can. It depends of how the person challenges your self-typing, with arguments or with bias. Alot of people have personal reasons for saying someone is not in their quadra, for example. That's bias.
yeah or the magic moment when you see someone who's talked trash of a specific type challenges your self typing to put you in the trashy bin :D who wouldn't enjoy that?
It's rather about their Ego getting hurt. They have developed this attachment to a certain image of themselves, and if you do not acknowledge that, they feel like it is an affront to their Ego. They feel slighted. And insecure, because how can you not see them the way they "are" (or rather, want to be seen)?! So they get upset. People are quite touchy when you invalidate their idealized view of themselves in any shape or form.
This is actually pretty much why I wrote my posts. Also, because I know myself more than you know me, and your knowledge of socionics is more limited when it comes to me than mine is. Claiming anything about me on this forum would be absurd, apart from a few people which I have had a deep verbal vivisection of my personality with. To be clear, you aint one of them.
I think both sides can be argued for. It is easy to step on and feel stepped on when we're discussing personality of individuals. The generalizing nature of systems like this tend to create this effect. I think it is important to be open to the one who is typing, but also the one who is the individual that seeks to be typed, or is being typed. That's partially why we're here, right? It isn't that hard to be considerate and tread lightly, not all people are ready to be told that they're ''completely wrong about themselves in Socionics'', they'll surely find out for themselves if they're being encouraged to learn and discuss.
Well, I find it a bit lame to get upset about being re-typed on a spreadsheet that is specifically about typing others. You gotta expect not everyone to agree. But hey, that's just me.
The massive focus on Ne and the secondary Ti and the amount of Si he loves and needs and the fact he responds easily and well to Fe and is Alpha and Fi polr and the way he really likes SEIs and gets along well with SLIs and the way he doesn’t really understand gammas very well and the fact he is super irrational and quite extroverted and the help I got typing him years ago from people I trust and so on blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah he’s sort of a classic ILE not even hard to type blah blah
So, you do understand that people's attitude or perceived attitude towards a person can impact how that person takes something, and maybe can see where other people are coming from in their complaints to you now?
---
Btw, I don't hate you. In fact I said that you were similar to me in some aspects, and it was those aspects I associated with sensing. That you read this as an insult, well, maybe reread what you said regarding people's egos being hurt and the image they want to project. That you think it was an insult probably has more to do with the associations you've made with sensing and intuition than what I actually said.
I do think you have an ego, and are sensitive, and the way you type people strikingly reminds me of Maritsa and her approach. While you may not say, "You are X. Confirm and final" that's certainly the attitude you take and yes, I've made fun of you for this. Sometimes I'm not very nice. But I wasn't actually trying to hurt you by any of it.
@Director Abbie thanks!
You are not the only one who typed me as an Si type, so you are wrong in your assumption this is just about me getting my ego hurt over some typing.
This is about you attacking me as a person, continuously. I am not bothered by all the other ones who typed me as S, because they don't make it a personal matter of invalidating me. I don't believe that all S types are stupid or whatever. It is the way you single me out and sh*t on me and undermine me all the time. I got annoyed by it before, and again, you singled me out this time and make it all about me being incompetent and sensitive? Great. Smh.
You seem bitter and kind of jealous, and I am assuming that is why you keep doing this. As you said, you see some similarities, if we were totally different (and I didn't have such a voice on this forum) you most likely wouldn't really care.
Oh well.
"jealous" lmao..
all fun and laughters until someone loses an eye
Please tell me you see the irony here. This is what people have been telling you in this thread, multiple times while you continue to insist that they're upset. That was the whole point of bringing it up, so you could see that what you accuse others of is exactly how you act. This is the 2nd time I've held a mirror up to your behavior and you've claimed you were attacked.
I see you as a kid that kind of needs to be shown how she's acting, and I've felt protective of you. I tried to be encouraging, giving positive responses to some of your good posts in your "Typing for Dummies" thread and generally trying not to be overly harsh in the things I've said to you. It's a parental/teaching instinct that I feel, not hate, and that's not meant to be condescending, it's just how I feel. But I do think you need a bit of a wake-up. And I think that maybe you can get past your ego and see outside yourself. Maybe you can take what you're feeling, and recognize that it is a parallel to how you claim others are reacting to you. It's to show you that perspective that I've done it. Take all of your arguments and put them in the mouths of other people . . . can you now see their perspective?
I acknowledge I have been too harsh myself in the way I have typed some people. I did not take their Ego into account. Everyone is sensitive when it comes to their Ego. Personally I am not that attached to a typing, believe it or not. But there are certain things you have said, that were more personal, which affected me. I believe I rarely step into personal territory, unless someone started with attacking me first. I find it one of the worst things to do to someone, to attack them personally. I find type to be a more "objective" matter – type is not the entirety or even core of who you are, it is just the way your brain processes the world – and in that way I was ignorant of how personal people can take typings. So yeah, I could be ignorant of that, and I could apologize for that. But that does not make it okay what you are doing with me, scolding me as if I was your little child. It is pretty much condescending.
if you dont want people to see you as a child, dont act like a child
im sure im like a child in some ways, however my ego isnt attached to not being seen as a child so i dont care much. now see how much you are attached to your ego which you claim not to be. :shrug:
Who is "TBA"? I must know!
// draws a pentagram and summons @Director Abbie
there is a vandalism in self-typing column
new names mb added
Blah, I have no idea how to add my name to this and don't want to screw it up lol.
"Self-typing" is EIE. If sub-types are important than EIE-Ni.
Would like to be added too. It would be interesting to see a schematic of how people on here type me.
Nocturne and para have been added.
It mb better to create a separate table or spreadsheet where people may add records with new names themselves. From this table you may then add records with new names to the main table. As I notice you may do not add new names for long. While that would be a compromise.
So, how do I add myself?
You have to log in to google now just to see the spreadsheet? Was this done purposely?
@Director Abbie, can you change/update my username in the spreadsheet?
Oh it works now LOL
pls put my name on the list :wave:
@Director Abbie @Raver
Is it possible to change mine to ESI?
This how it was initially, but eventually spreadsheet abuse via graffiti such as porn and mock spreadsheets ended it quickly. @Director Abbie can tell you more about it. Also, your name is updated.
Added
Done
I would like to be added. LII-Ne.
Please change my name from Toynbee to Doctor Weird on the spreadsheet.
Could I be added as well? I'm completely lost when it comes to most of this. (It doesn't help that websites describe types differently rofl)
I tested as SEI-Fe, but that only describes me in a state of stress. But going off the descriptions as sociotypes, it seems I'm almost equal parts EII/IEI... perhaps 60/40.
My raw numbers are:
96% INTROVERTED
59% INTUITIVE
76% FEELING
71% PROSPECTING
61% ASSERTIVE
But for the type me test here, I got:
A=8 (Ne)
B=9 (Ni)
C=0 (Se)
D=10 (Si)
E=9 (Te)
F=9 (Ti)
G=16 (Fe)
H=27 (Fi)
What the heck lol. Like I said... very lost...
I'll have to hunt down some here. I've answered some on TypoC, so I could always just copy/paste them (not here; generally speaking lol)
Thanks for the suggestion :)
Hello, I'm a bit confused. I'm trying to get typed and I'm not sure what to do here. I was trying to link a poll to this post https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...75#post1355575 :shrug:
Hmmm ca not find my google user account that was to create my row. I want to change Abbie N->C subtype (she is just wannabe normal... ha).
I'm not sure what you are asking here, but maybe @Abbie the Child can help. (You want to be added to the spreadsheet?)
I would like my self-typing to be updated to EII-Ne-N or whatever format is less confusing.
Haha yeah ignore this, old news :p
How do I get a column? Also could you update my self typing for socionics to LIE-Ni and enneagram as 3w4?
@Abbie the Child
test