trololololololololo
Printable View
trololololololololo
Always a pleasure :hug:Quote:
Originally Posted by sorrows
https://i.imgur.com/slNOVIW.png
The only thing Imma cut is the guy who does this and isn't even sneaky about it :justwait:
http://media.giphy.com/media/lgn6HaiiwHBXW/giphy.gif
https://media1.tenor.com/images/84e4...itemid=7600435
Individual field/cell protection also works^Quote:
Originally Posted by Troll Nr 007
lol ooo's entries just made my night
They are very Fe while being Se valuing quadra and Te PoLR, IEI.Quote:
Originally Posted by wasp
pff the funny thing about this is that i was trying to be seriousQuote:
Originally Posted by wasp
@sirac
Attachment 12753
yes? so sweet of u :oops:
Super ego relations are among the worst (from descriptions, and self experience) when they get closer, but, usually I have good feelings for the IEIs on here.Quote:
Originally Posted by ooo
I meant to ask you. There was a poster on here who appeared here briefly, they sounded exactly like you, and they were asking why their high emotionalism was Fe and not Fi. Then they disappeared. Anyway I thought they might be you, testing out to see if you were Fe or Fi. If I remember who they were, i'll link it, they were just like you.
Anyway, I know you weren't trying to be serious :) I think it's a 'merry', non 'serious' quadra thing to do to lighten the mood. Fi types would be inclined to take such value statements with a little more seriousness. Just my opinion. We're not all type of course and sometimes we just do stuff.
If you want to know (if it matters), I don't dislike you and I think you're OK :content:
BTW I heard on the rumor mill that you do have a dislike for Bertrand, and have said as much in several posts. From what i've gathered, you do have a dislike for Aylen. Complicated politics :) Just stick with your own opinions, too much F stuff and drama for me :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Arachne
Anyway your post was good because it showed who likes Bertrand (trolls vs non trolls), so thanks.
Oh, I think you're OK too in my book.
It's like this today haha
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VM2eLhvsSM
i wasn't even alive yet but i got chills. genius ad campaign. also, i miss the 70s. lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by at sirac son of sirac
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgdjf
those don't do it for me. i have a love of 70s staged "heartfelt" musical numbers. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by at sirac son of sirac
@at sirac son of sirac @bgdjf
All cozy in the 70s? Good, let me ruin it for you. This thing exists:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-7uUre03XE
I hate you. XD
Wow, the new X Files episode surely looks dope.Quote:
Originally Posted by at sirac son of sirac
I was really trying to be serious lolol my plan was to type all the list, I actually have been thinking about making a list of all the people on here for a while, I have a paper on my notes with all the people of the forum I've typed, but then, on there, I felt compelled to follow the column, and in the end I felt ashamed not to know most people in there lol so I gave up before even starting.. let's say so.Quote:
Originally Posted by at sirac son of sirac
I had no other nicknames aha
and yeah ok, sure, wtv you say sirac, as if I havent seen you type IEIs as EII just because you liked them, and ur passive-aggressive way to turn people u dont like into other quadras.. I mean, don't play it nice just because I called u out on the dynamic of super-egos, the things u say to other people about how u feel about them, underestimating a specific group, can be offending if then u put "me" or anyone else in the group u showed to underestimate, js
well, this pattern is common on this forum, not blaming u to follow the crowd ;)
I don't like everyone who I type as Delta. Some people I like I type as other quadra. It's all good.
Edit: Now that I think about it, i'm struggling to think about any Deltas I don't like. Hmmm. There's some I may not have much in common with, or to talk about with, but, I don't think there's a 'dislike'. Hmm i'll maybe think about that one. Interesting. Thanks for mentioning it.
People say a lot of things, I am just being honest, but, as you mention it, that sort of thing is Fi valuing.Quote:
Originally Posted by ooo
I know an IEE male at work, we don't socialize much, but we get on quite well. He tries to be pleasant with everyone, but in times alone we share our opinions and likes and dislikes about people, quite Fi judging I suppose it would seem. Anyway it's not the best, it just sort of happens. But, like him, I try to be pleasant with all people, but Fi is as Fi does at times.
With ESE I work with we talk about what people do. With IEE it's how we feel. There's some crossovers, and some differences. Subtle, but existing.
Cool :content:
I thought Bert makes you angry. Never understood why you paid so much efforts to fight with him. His messages were a little senseless.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylen
> I am hardly on the forum lately but thanks for the mention so I could clear this up.
it's nice when IRL distracts you from local assylum
I don't know anyone who doesn't do this in some extent. Telling people how we feel about them is an essential part in establishing relationships..... ugh.Quote:
Originally Posted by at sirac son of sirac
If I say, "they're all a bunch of mamabangers I hate them all, but hey, u not so bad among them all, I do fine with u! <3 <3!" this can be Fi in your twisted idea of what socionics gotta be like, but it's just plainly rude if u say it infront of everyone for everyone to see... Fi? think again.
ps, I'm sure your IEE friend doesn't share such opinions in front of all, as well
@ooo,
Well, any socionics I use, it's either from articles which can be referenced, or it's my own observations, which can be supported by referenced articles, and, or, it's consistent with the overall theory too.
So, I use this to type you as IEI. I don't know why it's a big deal. You type as INFP in MBTI, yet you want to be ESI in socionics. It doesn't make sense to change two dichotomies like that. It's describing two different entities. Although, sometimes you change it from ESI to EII. But, i've found with Fe types, often their language is different. Especially Fe in Se quadra, it's like it's fun to argue or something.
Anyway, it's all good, you have a good day/morning/night whichever you are :)
look sirac, u can type me all u want and display ur bias all u like. what i was saying is that it's simply rude, to me, to being called IEI from someone who in more occasions threw offending notes at IEIs and whatnot. can u get the logic? ok bye.
it's simply correct. while rude is your complaint and inappropriate as you think youself as INFPQuote:
Originally Posted by ooo
Probably 5-10% of those typings have change to "no opinion" or an alternative type since 2016, in line with those individuals who have become less certain or who have changed their self-typing. My rule was to only include individuals whose self-typings I agreed with strongly and/or without serious reservations. I think I could probably add a few more individuals to the list, although I don't feel especially inclined to do so at the moment. I suppose my view is that must be a certain period of stability or consistency before I could add someone to such a list.Quote:
Originally Posted by Subteigh22 Oct 2016Quote:
Originally Posted by Subteigh
I think the quoted post is still true in my perception. If any of the individuals have changed their self-typings since, then should not be on here. There are individuals since this was posted who should probably be included, but I am reluctant to fish for additions lest I somehow lower my bar of qualification (i.e. that I agree strongly with their self-typings). Perhaps if I was to do the process again from scratch, I'd be able to make it up-to-date.
add
summerprincess, selftypes as IEI
rude is u telling me what i think of myself lol, as if u knowQuote:
Originally Posted by Sol
rude is u intromitting the conversations i was having with someone else just to extrapolate the part u want to point out... as usual
rude is that u keep applying standards (on me) that u don't even follow urself, for ur IR list is full of self typed MBTI P whom u types as J
rude is that u keep forgetting that this is socionics, not MBTI, and that the 2 admittedly don't match 100%
rude is that i told u already to leave me alone, and here u are.
gosh... for ur own concern, yes, i'm calling u 2 both (sol and sirac) out on ur bullshit. come complain that this is not Fi just to share in the next post how Fi are honest and whatnot. let me have a laugh pls
Te Lead confirmed lolQuote:
Originally Posted by ooo
I know that you always were original in thinking processes. Too original for any EII. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by ooo
I hope they'll help you to type SLE to LSE and you both be happy.
i hope you'd see that there's more to relationships than socionics, but i doubt thatd make u happyQuote:
Originally Posted by Sol
I never understand why you type a bunch of strangers on youtube or on the forum so it's ok. You have your reasons... I have mine for doing the things I do. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
Bert has irritated me, sure, but true anger? Why? If I did get angry with him it was so fleeting I don't even remember it now so must not have been too intense or memorable? This is the internet, we don't know each other. What irritated me about the ESE typing is that it felt passive aggressive because he has said that ESE = stupid in his mind. Don't know about you but I don't like being called stupid but if someone is going to do it then just say it outright to me. Don't make a veiled accusation of it that only you and maybe your inner circle will get. I pick up on that stuff.
Those who have known me longer on this forum know I have called several people out for that. I don't care if people talk behind my back but if I find out I might just say something too. Omg that is so Se! Only Se egos speak their mind! Everyone else is just a bunch of complacent 9s avoiding conflict or lashing out angrily. :lol: Sarcasm... It's not. It's understanding how people influence others... I will counterbalance it when I am inspired to. Some people don't care how they are perceived and others do. I want to be completely understood, ideally, but it is rare to be completely understood by anyone. Just so we are clear, I know I am not stupid and I am pretty sure those who call me that know it too. People who might think I am stupid probably won't say it. Saying someone is stupid is often a way to dismiss another's points with prejudice. Bert will get that reference. Not sure that is what he did to me. :p
The only people I have been angry with on this forum directly related to something more personal between us. So like I said I have not had a personal relationship, or a one on one, with Bert so people might be reading too much into my responses to him typing me ESE. I gave him a chance to explain why. When he didn't I decided I would get him to reveal more about himself, instead of how he perceived me and why. It helps me understand others better. I think a few people caught on to how I get people to reveal themselves by engaging in a little conflict with them. It makes the forum a bit more interesting too, at least for those not conflict averse, and sometimes something new is learned. I have demonstrative Fi. I think most people do not understand how the demon function can be used as a game. They should look into it.
If anyone is unsure about my motives, feelings, thoughts, etc... in relation to my type (or anything else) all they have to do is ask (like sirac did) instead of making up a new type for me or distorting what I say, or do, to justify their typing of me. It is weird when someone is so invested in their typings of others that they don't even bother to ask questions. The worst offenders don't even know their own type. Some people have asked me things in private and it has cleared up a lot of misunderstandings. What a novel idea, right... asking. :content:Quote:
8. Demonstrative Function
I
A person uses this element mainly as a kind of game, or to ridicule those who he thinks take it too seriously. They often intentionally go against its conventional usage simply to prove a point in favor of their creative function. However, this function is used quite often in private, to produce information of its element to support their creative function when focusing on making contact with the external world.
A person will often have just as sophisticated an understanding of this function as his or her leading function. Unlike the ignoring function it plays a major part in a person's worldview, since as the vulnerable function of one's dual it requires especially delicate attention. Thus, when a person is given information regarding the element in the demonstrative function by someone else, they will tend to take it as obvious information that is irrelevant to completely focus on. One will often use the demonstrative function to defend and further support their beliefs made in the vulnerable function.
The demonstrative function is easiest function to use (after the base function) yet often occurs sporadically. When one experiences a problem regarding this function, one must correct it as it does play a vital part in a person's worldview.
So, being annoyed with someone does not equal anger. I am in touch with my intuition and feelings which includes anger. When I am angry I find a way to express it and resolve it. Otherwise it is like this bitter poison that can eat you up.
People on this forum have strange ideas of what anger looks like and would probably be terrified to deal with real anger irl. I have been around lots of angry people and know how to deal with it without backing down. So to one person it makes me E9 and to another it makes me Se or Fi. I took a look at the spreadsheet which verifies that it is all subjective. I have yet to see someone type in a truly objective way. There may be some closer than others but in the end how you feel about someone is going to influence your typing and most people base that on their self typing.
Yeah some things that are very real to me... :love:Quote:
it's nice when IRL distracts you from local assylum
actually my entire point has always been that you look down on ESE which is why you see being typed as one as an insult, not that I look down on them (if you think of benefactor relations it makes a lot more sense as a projection of yours onto me rather than it being true as a function of my actual ITR--in other words, I may be factually wrong, but not intending to insult). it hardly matters at this point though, because I fundamentally agree with your assertion that typing is subjective and not meant to be taken so seriously as to actually get angry over, whether insult or not, in the first place. if you think I was insulting you, you would have to reckon that with the even more clear fact of my distaste for beta [1], from which anything would be a step up. so you can say I don't like ESE, which isn't true, but even if you assume it to be true, its still not really an insult if I'm moving you up in the grand scheme of my internal subjective ranking. in any case, if you prefer to be thought of as IEI i accept that, since if the spreadsheet has shown me anything its that people care about consensus over truth and inasmuch as that is the case its all meaningless anyway
I also think the more I come to like ESE the less you fit my conception of them, so maybe you've been right all along, but inasmuch as that is the case it becomes an insult because I'm essentially learning you're not good enough for ESE. in the end, we're just talking past eachother since what you deem to be the basis for an insult and what I deem to be the basis are two different standards (intent), hence the more I try not to insult you by your own criterion the more I feel guilty internally for doing exactly that. in other words, the nicer I try to be the more you take offense and vice versa. in the final analysis if I concede you being IEI and you and scarper are queen and white knight it does make sense. now both of you would have the world believe its simply because you're just two amazing people who can get along with anyone despite ITR, but I think a quick trip through everyone's posting history shows that to be manifestly untrue
the bottom line is I'm willing to concede we live in two different worlds and our language reflects that and communication is difficult which leads to conflict, which I think neither of us feels all that deeply (as in true bad blood), but from the outside looks pretty bad. ultimately I think we both understand things well enough and we each have our separate circles to tend to and that's perfectly alright
[1] which by the way I don't concede, but let's operate on your perception of me for the sake of argument
Show me where I look down on ESE? It was never a matter of whether you liked or disliked ESE to me. I didn't care if you liked me or not. I cared that you were repeatedly putting a type on me that you said was stupid, more than once. It doesn't take a genius to figure out why. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Bertrand
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bertrand
You can't see why I felt a little insulted?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bertrand
good job Aylen~ same stuff I was complaining about with sirac tbh (and I guess now we have to be the same type for thinking this is rude similarly, aha.... anyway I remember one of your rants against Bertrand from back then where Sol stepped out to re-type you as EII/ESI, because "oh look at the Fi!" smh)
when I say I associate stupidity arising out of ESE its just the strongest example of Fe, which isQuote:
Originally Posted by Aylen
you exhibit "stupidity" in exactly this way. I noted that its a perceptual effect and objectively an "unfair, biased and possibly evil" effect of perception. if you can't understand this then we are hopelessly at odds because you can't understand why anyone might find Fe "stupid" but not the person. the consequence is you cannot broaden your perspective to a truly jungian view which contextualizes the "evil" out of these associations. inasmuch as you're locked into your commitment to battling over these issues without capacity to rise above them the evil is just as much in you as me, though. in other words, I view you as a self, and you view my view you of you as solely constrained to your ego, thus my statements rankle you in an unintended way. in sum, you've missed the point and continue to do so. by manufacturing offense in this way you can bond with others over a common cause but its all very empty and misguided from my point of viewQuote:
at the same time feel as if they are forced to worship the "fetish" - a stupid impression made from the most miserable and most primitive version, remotely resembling their EGO program - the area of their innate professionalism, according to which each of them feels like a congenital "lawmaker", an "expert", a "judge", but certainly not a servant performer of the most crude and primitive of her designs.
I was explaining what was going on with me at the time we were going back and forth in the past. I have moved on so you are off the mark. The post wasn't even about you. It was about me. You were merely an example and to pretend it wasn't irritating at the time would leave out an important detail while explaining the difference in my anger and irritation. I wasn't intending to get you riled up over it. For that I apologize but not for what I said.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bertrand
>ive moved on
>reposts year old post from then newbie
well, I'm glad you moved on :content:
Me too and I only reposted to show you why it was irritating then. Not to stir things up again. :content:Quote:
Originally Posted by Bertrand
I know it's not the 70s but I can't help but be a little partial to the 80s/90s:Quote:
Originally Posted by bgdjf
https://youtu.be/SkNl5JiagW4?t=46
Quote:
Originally Posted by ooo
Quote:
Originally Posted by ooo
The only thing that's consistent in your behavior is the dynamic nature of your emotions.Quote:
Originally Posted by ooo
Here in the above quotes, you're calling out all sorts of 'rudes', simply for stating the factual point (:Te:) that you're INFP (by your own admission) and that you're IEI.
From your column in the type sheet, how you describe people, instead of their type:
'lol'
'no'
'hmm'
'oddball'
'no'
Which you admit yourself you did for 'lols', not being serious, then saying you are serious.
You don't display statics of interactions, but instead continue to display hyper emotionality - the energetic condition, which is, you continually display Fe.
What's rude is your insulting of me for stating the obvious socionic fact.
Anyway, it's not the first time it's happened, other users, cuivinen, domr, act the same (Fe egos), finally they come round in spite of their histrionics.
For some reason you never seem to remember to thank me though :)
Edit: Your column would likely be described as 'rude', but, it's just you being :Fe:, as everywhere.
for someone who doesnt like to stir shit up you're sure well full of it : )
ps, I suggest people obsessed with MBTI to perhaps change forum. oh no sorry WE ALL NEED SI-TE (?) DRAMA in our lives.
Drama creating - Fe, especially Beta NFQuote:
Originally Posted by ooo
Appeals to authority - aristocratic - Delta/Beta. Ignores factual information presented to know why is an Fe ego type (non Delta quadra, non :Te: valuing), instead prefers to rely on own imagined existence of type (Ni) whilst displaying thuggish attitude (Se valuing)Quote:
Originally Posted by ooo
Your typing column for group 'lols', as you say, and your attempts to drag others into the conversation by broad appeals:
Beta NF Quadra
- Beta types tend to enjoy group activities where the whole group participates in generating a common emotional atmosphere, as in laughing at jokes, etc.
- Beta types tend to give more value to feelings when they are demonstrated with clear emotional expression, and tend to increase the level of their own emotional expression in order to get a reaction from other people. (You)
I like it. :) Typing by Ne/Fi is funny proccess for LSE.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylen
And I want to help others understand types better, where examples help.
> Bert has irritated me, sure, but true anger?
ok. "irritated"
> What irritated me about the ESE typing is that it felt passive aggressive because he has said that ESE = stupid in his mind.
well.. I don't exclude ESI possibility for him, which are close type :yup:
Gulnara (ESI) said that stoped talking with someone who asked "Are you stupid?". She had very high marks in school and studed ok (but not excellent) in uni on engineering speciality. She's for sure not stupid (though not good in logical confrontation), highly intelligent, knows this, but somehow takes such criticism as meaningful.
> Don't know about you but I don't like being called stupid but if someone is going to do it then just say it outright to me.
Mostly I get interest why, as possibly I or the opponent made a mistake somewhere. I understand that it's more about situation, than my general abbilities which I know relatively. Mb T types take easier such criticism. Seems I'd could to get deeper offence and worse emotions by F regions criticism or relation.
> Don't make a veiled accusation of it that only you and maybe your inner circle will get. I pick up on that stuff.
Fi types prefer to avoid direct or rude criticism.
> Saying someone is stupid is often a way to dismiss another's points with prejudice. Bert will get that reference.
I think he trolls. :) He may don't think bad about you, but to get fun from your reactions.
> I think a few people caught on to how I get people to reveal themselves by engaging in a little conflict with them.
conflict as the mean to know other one better. for Fi type this would sound as the heresy deserving to burn someone :)
> I have demonstrative Fi. I think most people do not understand how the demon function can be used as a game. They should look into it.
your demons are funny
> If anyone is unsure about my motives, feelings, thoughts, etc... in relation to my type (or anything else) all they have to do is ask (like sirac did) instead of making up a new type for me
I find it's funny to see new types for me, how differently people may perceive you and how far they are from the reality.
> It is weird when someone is so invested in their typings of others that they don't even bother to ask questions.
People may prefer to keep doubts than to do efforts to get more clear opinion. As they don't take the typing seriously enough for those efforts.
> People on this forum have strange ideas of what anger looks like and would probably be terrified to deal with real anger irl.
It's more a term question: irritation as term for slight anger, for example.
> I have yet to see someone type in a truly objective way.
This needs highly objective method which got objective proof. Socionics has no this still.
> There may be some closer than others but in the end how you feel about someone is going to influence your typing and most people base that on their self typing.
conformism is high in speculative regions like today typing
> Yeah some things that are very real to me... :love:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpZpvo4rQAE
sirac, u asked to be removed from the sheet to "sit yourself out of it". and the last 3 pages have been full of your passive aggressive comments to the people u dont like.
u call my attitude funny and rude for typing people in a way u dont like, yet u dont know why i typed certain people in a certain way, and i guess the lol really fits u, better than SLI.
SLI seems really off for u. but it's fine, keep typing me IEI, so we can keep being superegos and admire each others from afar lol
Y'all shy babes are endearing... :oops: BUT WHERE IS THE BATTLETYPING WHEN WE REALLY NEED IT HUHH?!
Plan A (nice) is... simply tagging people and asking politely to give their opinions in the sheet :lol: The incentive being that you get typed in return :thumbsup:
@anndelise
@peteronfireee (please someone add this cute bun to the list, he's missing! @Director Abbie)
@FDG
@Viktor
@Olimpia
@Without Warning
@Arachne
http://www.favslist.com/photos/pages...5859-35441.jpg
If that doesn't work:
Plan B (evil): We need someone unlikeable with extremely controversial, completely off typings (that are also lowkey insulting!) that try to prove everybody wrong to get it going. Like someone who types @Troll Nr 007 ESI-Se 2w3 SX. That would be explosive. Then others want to correct and make a better column, causing a huge buzz and downright hatestorm. The result: the sheet and thread blow up, further attracting people. We have to lure said controversial typist in with making them believe that they are completely accurate, the best, and welcome here. That's the devious scheme, now we just need someone to bring in the bait person. (Maybe this plan is already ruined because I gave it away, but the person would have to be too dense and caught up in being right to get it.)
https://media.giphy.com/media/lY1F6B...facebook_s.jpg
I could make some pie charts.
But if I do, do I include the anonymous columns?
And do I only make pie charts of those who request one?
@Director Abbie there's probably no point including the anonymous data in any charts, because there is no way of determining whether the data is valuable (in the sense that is the opinion of an actual person).
Yes please, that'd be great... :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Director Abbie
Attachment 12758Quote:
Originally Posted by User Name
Thank you so much! :love: Cool, I'm 10% DHD... :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Director Abbie
Shoot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Director Abbie
Pie charts seems like too much, and a waste of time
@lavos
@Cuivienen
@Number 9 large
Someone is mangling your columns. It looks like they sorted the columns to move all the inputs up, then fiddled with the results. I can put the old inputs back like I did for the column of @ooo but without protecting your column with your email the slob could just do it again.
:reallymad: I can waste my time however I please.Quote:
Originally Posted by Arachne
Thanks @Director Abbie,
I'm wondering what a graph distribution would be like of the frequency of each of the 16 types among the forum members. There's opportunities to compare self typing with other typing as a % of match. Also the most frequently typed type by other members of the forum as a whole.
Hmmm these are some complex charts/graphs IMO. I'm just liking the pie chart and thinking of ways to work with the information, but i'm new to it. So it's just ideas really, but I am enjoying the displays :thumbsup: :)
Probably with the right ideas and the right graphs/charts display, a portfolio of types could be produced... However, i'll not get carried away just yet. I suppose I just didn't realize this could be quite so exciting :)
As better alternative I offer you to add @summerprincess in the list. In case you take your duties seriously.Quote:
Originally Posted by Director Abbie
Adding SLE to your list of possible typings, including LSI, and outside possibility of LSE.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
it's niceQuote:
Originally Posted by at sirac son of sirac
there are 8 another versions I was suspected in
Ah I see, you're looking for ways to feed your :Fe: seeking :thinking:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
I wondered why my bank account has gained it's first billion but then I saw LIE typing.
:shrug: didn't say you couldn't, just felt bad if you were to go through all the effort and didn't get enough response or something.Quote:
Originally Posted by Director Abbie
I added stuffs. :lol:
YOU HAVE BEEN TYPED BY ME (maybe, some of you). :muaha:
i typed some of you, too. i don't know who you are though, strangeling.Quote:
Originally Posted by strangeling
@Viktor superb! That sounds good. You're with Tallmo there with the DCNH :yup: Dominant for me (heh), how so?
@strangeling Make yer column smaller before you get yelled at like me :hello:
You don't keep up with name changes. :shifty:Quote:
Originally Posted by Satan
I am just waiting for everyone to do their's so I can type you all properly. I will use your typings of others (against you) in the final analysis. :agent:
Taking it to the next level of holistic stereotyping.
His is wide because of the content. I made the font a bit smaller and adjusted the width. It should be fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chae
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/00/9d/ca/0...f8054d55f4.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Director Abbie
And I get clapback because other columns need space, too? And it should be quick and easy to read? Hypocrisy. Either apply the standard to everyone or nobody :flame:
I only requested that you lessen the decorations around your username and pick something less loud as a background color. He apparently has a lot to say in the typing sections, and can use more space to say it. I see no hypocrisy.
Did you even listen?! It is the same principle as I said, readability and space for others instead of crashing the format. Of course it's unequal treatment :8* Make it more narrow guuuuuuuuurllll. It ain't difficult. The concern was that it hurt someone's eyes and thus it was changed - legit! Now this irritates my eyes so I can make the same demand plain and simple.Quote:
Originally Posted by Director Abbie
@Chae It's not hypocritical if the same standard was applied to strangeling, which it was, hence why abbie edited the settings for strangeling's section by widening the column and making the font size smaller, therefore your request was fulfilled. you were advised to make your section easier to read, and you fulfilled that request by editing your column, so the circumstances were the same, and so were the end results, more or less, now where's the problem?
It wasn't fulfilled as elaborated - narrower please :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by wasp
It doesn't seem that you actually care about resolving the issue, otherwise you'd take issue with the width of ooo's column as well (which I don't think any of us have taken issue with yet). I'm aware that strangeling's column is wider in comparison, but the format of those two columns is still very similar.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chae
I still think there's a noticeable difference between several people taking issue with a bright background, which does hurt the eyes, along with not serving any real purpose beyond standing out, and a column which is slightly wider, by accident, because a few members wanted to elaborate on their typings.
Colors actually make things easier on the eyes since there's less time spent remembering your position
That's what comments / notes are for. Most of his comments aren't really constructive either : "I don't know. God there is a lot of people on here. I'm getting bored now..."Quote:
Originally Posted by Director Abbie
Thank you, it's sweet that you say it. :oops: I thought people would find hearts nice and bright red is the classic signature Chaecolor so...??? I need a place for it elsewhere. :shrug: My eyes it doesn't hurt but color perception differs among humans.Quote:
Originally Posted by aster
Well, I like ooo so I won't say anything, it doesn't apply in this case just because! :love:Quote:
Originally Posted by wasp
...am trying to demonstrate the bias while being vindictive don't you notice? :popcorn: You haven't seen the rude and condescending ass DMs I've gotten over this stupid issue. Am still grudging hard and y'all will know it. The only solution I'm interested in so far is making the sheet good-looking that's all. There's nothing wrong about standing out. Do what you want with that, my design stays in the basement for now. Elaborations are for this thread and not actually informative in the sheet, I learned nothing from reading the commentary. That one as we had with ooo above is just for amusement, expression, and embellishment which is just as use/purposeless to the actual typings as standing out so again the hypocrisy is dripping.
Exactly!Quote:
Originally Posted by thehotelambush
I think they should be included. They've been an integral part of our community!Quote:
Originally Posted by Director Abbie
okay but see, I found those comments useful, so clearly it's subjective and the only real solution is that everybody makes their own spreadsheetsQuote:
Originally Posted by thehotelambush
Different color columns = improved readability!
One person going custom color is all it takes -- less/no extraneous up-scrolling (color denotes user), and adjacent columns are fortified in their organization. 3-for-1 deal at least.
I go light gray, would love green pastel option :)
I'm not going to be picky about how people color their columns. You could have black letters on a black background and I'd put up with it. The only real issue I had with Chae's design is that she had elaborations beside her username that lengthened her whole column to much more than was being used by the actual typings. And that seemed an unnecessary reason for wideness.
Using notes for comments is a good solution. It looks like you can just right-click a spot to add a note that can be seen when the spot is hovered over.
Woofl, you should be able to click a custom-color box and get the shade of green you want.
Regarding column widths, I'm trying to get a reasonable balance between avoiding widening rows and avoiding absurdly-wide columns.
it's a chae moment🌈
whoever filled in a self-typing for me knock it off
i don't self-type as shit
socionics is fake news
Only beloved @User Name took up the task of typing me. It' so cold and lonely here, in this column...
And Chae is the Lord and Lady of entertainment on this site, undeniable.
That's nice. Good idea 💡
Regarding self-typings, I specified people need to be 100% sure of it if they do it for someone else. Not, "I remember seeing it in their profile," but, "I asked them recently and they told me what they officially self-type as."Quote:
Originally Posted by Capitalist Pig
@woofwoofl good aesthetic choice on your column I must say
Re-added to the list.
(Column X)
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...AASUVORK5CYII=http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...AASUVORK5CYII=
Hmmm... I got harmonizer subtype typing. I have nothing against it. Certain people, when they see me, think that I have other side inside of me beyond the surface. I'm also bit weird, so...
:muaha:
holy shit you people will write tomes about anything
Someone's still messing with the spreadsheet? I see my name and several of my types of others have been changed.
I'll re-add my list when the 'practical joker' has found another hobby :)
50 shades of blueQuote:
Originally Posted by Director Abbie
You can protect your column with a gmail address.Quote:
Originally Posted by at sirac son of sirac
Leave our cute delta from Chae along.Quote:
Originally Posted by Viktor
For VI you'd need a video, not a single photo.
For brevity's sake, I put "n/a" in the column where I type others. If you scroll over to the left, you'll see my self-typing.Quote:
Originally Posted by thehotelambush
ok, my mistake.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuivienen