-
Printable View
-
video would be better. I did not see it, for example
photos are acceptable as additional only
Yeah that sounds LxI af. :p
You seem like no subtype (aka LSI-0) to me, based on V.I and that self-description.
@Number 9 large has stronger Se + Fe, in comparison. His Fe is a bit stronger than yours. He's Se subtype.
Based on the pics alone, I'd type you as Sp/Sx 6w7 (693).
You also remind me a bit of @soulclap. He's LSI-2Ti Sp/Sx 6w5 (693).
You seem to be a mix of @soulclap and @Number 9 large to me.
LSI and SLI have the exact same strength in all the functions, theyre just ordered differently.
From the photos i can tell you value fe, even though you have 1d fe yourself. Fe polr is like "ill kill you if you try to cheer me up or not take me seriously at all times"
Fe seeking is "i like it when you try to cheer me up or be nonserious with me, i even try to provoke emotional reactions in other people for fun"
I dont think fe polr would regularly try to make others laugh with stupid faces :P
Yeah, I don't see any signs of Ne Creative.
Your Sensing seems to be good. You are aware of your surroundings and physical self, and have got that ironic self-confidence that LSIs often possess, ime. ("Such a beauty.")
Your others comments are also very Beta ST:
"I'm draining energy from these motherf***ing pidgeons" (No Se PoLR person would say that haha.)
"I like this pic, but the piece of paper under the shoe kind of ruins it" (This sounds like Fi Role + strong Si/Creative Se to me.)
And this is Sp/Sx stuff:
"I joke about many things, but never about food."
"Just let me sleep, darling"
:beta:
The video should fit to recommendations. Language may be any.
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...=1#post1096450
SLI>LSI
Very SLI, I'd say. And no, you don't look at all like number 9 large (or any other LSI) imo.
So, considering VI I'd say SLI. However, since LSI and SLI have exactly the same dimensionality of functions, I'd suggest looking at the quadra values and your most used (valued) function along with the weakest (PoLR) and seeking (Ne vs Fe).
Cute
ESE
Most posters in this thread don't know shit. You are SLI.
People. Why return to such a random, pseudo, and biased way of typing when the video & questionnaire were already perfectly clear in terms of character insight! V.I. only brings more precariousness to socionics. And finished typings in particular. Do we need this? No.
https://media.giphy.com/media/l46Cgp...ggmY/giphy.gif
@Reyne post these in the member picture thread instead! V.I. is just popular here because we wanna get to know each other visually.
'everybody wants me' calm such ego down? :lol:
I don't want you to be my own type not even care about having you in my quadra (and I don't think Number 9 really cares either, he was just joking with the 'hes ours now' I guess). You just seem SLI>LSI to me, aka Ne valuer, I'd even consider LII too.
Never read your stuff or watch any vid that I can remember. Post them in here if you want more accurate stuff.
Finally, yes, there are a few desperate girls in here and possibly dudes too (as in everywhere). You have to deal with that or ignore them (you can do that too, unless you feel so much preassure to be nice, which will put you more towards Fe valuer, LII :).
Btw, tests are reliable if you get consistent scores.
Also it would be interesting to hear what you think about your own type (N/S, J/P), because I saw you typing yourself as SLI weeks ago.
Cool. Point for SLI. I like to say a lot of bs too. Some ppl get it, some ppl don't. But its funny anyway. I use it as an armor against my low esteem for everybody else. I started using smileys because it make others understand that I'm not being serious or set an humorous tone to my conversation. You can try them too.
Nice, but its important to make your own research and construct your criteria about stuff instead of just relying in others opinions. (If not you'd get the asuras grudge which means you'll always be confused about your own type for the eternity).Quote:
I like all the answers in this thread since I consider you all to be more knowledgeable than me about socionics.
Could be. Never read your stuff. I'd seek for it and add more input probably (I don't promise anything, though).:content:Quote:
What I think about my own type? It's difficult, because I could write a convincing argument for LSI, SLI and LII. I could even see me as a Fi-ego. But all the times I let my thoughts flow in a thread, people tend to see me as SLI, so it's probably the more likely. I ain't sure about this.
Anyway, deciding if you are J/P shouldn't be so hard.
For the moment I still saying SLI because you seem more p (irrational) than j (rational), and more sensor than intuitive in those pics.
The pics are all over the place, so no fucking idea. A video might be a better way to determine your type, if you were serious.
Where's the pic
hehe well you do have a picture of a serious stern grimdark str8 man in your avatar which makes the humor a little distracting.... :lol: . But thanks for clarifying.Quote:
Wow, let me clarify this: I was bullshitting. I'm not serious when I say that kind of stuff. I do actually have very low self esteem and use humour as an armor.
SLI as LSI have the same strong functions, differently valued.
SLI have Ti and Se as instinctive (unconscious) unvalued strong functions.
While having as Program valued and conscious Si and Te. This means, Ti and Se in favor of Si and Te goals.
Goals of program: leisure, comfort, pleasure, practicality, business logic.
LSI have Si and Te as instinctive (unconscious) valued strong functions. While having as Program valued and conscious Ti and Se. Si and Te in favor of Ti and Se goals.
Goals of program: Power, success, own logic, order, control.
Both are vigilant of surroundings, not overly vigilant, though (one for Si and the other for Ti).
Anyway, what do you mean with having your head in the clouds? How does it look like or how could you define or describe it?
I'd write the descriptions of functions and you can see with what do you relate more:
So, with which of those traits do you relate or feel identified with?
Finally, of your pics I get Ne valuing, Logical type and looks more P>J temperament, imo.
I was reading your questionnaires (1) (2),in the first I see you having values of Delta>Alpha Quadra. Not beta or gama in there imo.
The answers are short and direct and I see P>J. I still seeing SLI as most likely type. I see Te (business logic) and Ni (assessing risks). You mention poor social skills as your weakness (1DFe), and mentioning laziness a lot (which is stereotypically Si). I don't think any j type would consider laziness as an impediment from achieving stuff in their life. Also you said you have fear of being judged by ppl, which I'd say is Fe PoLR combined with 6.
I don't see anything that points at Intuition over Sensing either. Mostly the opposite (you don't like to read which is something very enjoyed by N types, especially Njs; you don't consider yourself a philosophical person, etc)
I feel identified with most of your responses and attitude in general (I don't like to read books either, I hated school too and that was a reason for being depressed for almost all my school years, I feel unable to have a 365 42hrs per week job, repetitive and stationary, where I'm not my own boss, I cant have enough incomes, novelty or interest, and I have to take orders from others and not have enough freedom or space).
Also you literally said respect and having your own space, spending a good time (laughing), feeling comfortable and honesty are the most important things in friendship. (Si,Fi the later)
In all your preferences on feelings and morals I see a strong inclination towards Fi (one true, respect, honesty etc).
The only thing that seems off from SLI is the "I don't care about my body" thing, which I would say can be because of depressive states (happened to me too, however the Si focus is always there because its part of the personality).
I think part of your doubts about your type is due your e6 type. I saw scio having repetitively the same doubts. Also, part of your anxiety and stress problems could be related to your 6 fix too.
I hope that could help you to get your own conclusions.
I'd probably made further detailed analysis in your questionnaires threads later.
I can't see any pictures, but fwiw I think we would get along and I could totally see you as my dual.