Printable View
I think you have changed the keys. If you didnt than its:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
ILI
EII
ILE
EIE
LSI
IEE
LIE
SLE
ESI
LII
SEI
SEE
IEI
SLI
ESE
LSE
There would no problem in case I'd change the key in short time after you've posted the sorting as numbers. In the current situation - you've posted above numbers and now their meanings - so you've opened the key.Quote:
Originally Posted by Anglas
You may replace the numbers with types' names in the 1st message or to delete that message. Until that my comments about the sorting leads to opening the key.
.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
@Anglas
You dislike Si types - the only ego function which have most at 4 bottom types + only Se at top half. This points on your Se valued type.
A chance of your E type is some higher - as 2 top are I and 2 bottom are E.
You prefered N types - all top 4, 3/4 bottom. What rises S type possibility. But why S type would dislike the most Si types? It's the only function what have 3/4 at bottom. While at top Ne and Ni are presented equally. So the neutral about your S/N.
If type is S then among them more possible is SLE. as LSI and SEE have superego at top, and more chance for E is against ESI.
If you have N type what that can to be? It's among beta-gamma: EIE, IEI, ILI, LIE. If I did not know you better - I'd just noticed that your preferences fit better to LIE, IEI and taking about more chance for E, that gamma is top 1 and 2nd is LIE's semidual - LIE would be said as most possible N type. But there is also the interesting situation: the 1st S type you liked is LSI, 2nd is SLE and the least type you like is LSE - dual, activator and superego of EIE. And this add-on with S types you prefer compensates LIE vs EIE possibility closer to equal.
SLE, LIE, EIE - the types you should think the most about by IR test
I liked the analysis @Sol , thank you for your time.
This typing method has potential (it obviously has flaws), there a ways to make this like an excel program, where a person could just rate an invidual on a scale (1-10 or whatever) 1.0 value for base and 0.5 for creative, negative values for super ego functions and so on. Like for example:
if a person rates someone who is a SEE type and gives him like 6
6*:Se:*1 = 6:Se:
6*:Fi:*0.5 =3:Fi:
you get the idea (keep in my i'm putting random numbers here)
I think you need more people to take this test to get more data for it to be accurate.
In the future I may try for formalize IR preferences analysis. At least, partly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Anglas
With better materials than bloggers and mb better sorting method there will be more usefulness from formalizations. At least, a dual should be in most cases placed to top 4 types. At now a human mb needed much to overcome noises.
Cool test, and strong correlation for a first impression...
SEE
LIE
ILI EIE LSI LII IEI SLE
SEI ESI IEE
ILE LSE ESE
SLI
EII
@DELL
you should sort all 16 types. there should not be types said as equal for you
Will try to be more thorough some time down the line, when it's not so fresh in the mind....Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
These are rough comments below though, from what I remember....
At least there is consensus for SE>SI preference/attraction
SEE strong attraction
LIE nice, very comfortable
ILI EIE LSI LII IEI SLE cool, comfortable
SEI ESI IEE seemed ok
ILE LSE ESE hmmmm
SLI meh
EII Medusa
seems likeQuote:
Originally Posted by DELL
mb there could be goten more if to sort all. also when you sort all types - you think about your impressions more and deeper so may place types differently, - closer to expected by the theory
your approach is not by rules so higher chance for P type. your comment with time mention is closer to N types
as we see 2 first types are gamma and 1st in 2nd raw is gamma too (as probably had more of your sympathy) - ILI has more chance than IEI
Yeah that's what I thought....:thumbsup: definitely would be ILI>IEI based on what I have read of the two types though...Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
I had strongly considered ILI (along with LII) before this test anyway
You may record a video so I'd look what types are possible by VI impressions.Quote:
Originally Posted by DELL
Also try to understand peoples' types IRL and to check how IR effects fit to concrete types. It's obligate step to be highly sure in own type. During this step you'll get initial typing skills and will check them too. This takes a time to notice that people IRL fit good to the theory with the supposed types. You may use VI impressions to intuitively guess their types, to analyse their behavior, to offer them tests.
Would be nice if you have ILI indeed. You've placed SEE at the top - so pretty situation.
@Sol
- LSE
- LIE
- LII
- SEI
- ESE
- ESI
- ILE
- IEI
- SLI
- SEE
- LSI
- IEE
- EII
- SLE
- ILI
- EIE
First three tied.
you need to sort allQuote:
Originally Posted by COOL AND MANLY
I did. Tied is past tense.
@COOL AND MANLY
you prefer T types, so more for your F type
ESE, EIE, ESI have superego at top 4
IEI has suborderie and subrevisie too high
SEE has suborderie at 1 top
EII has subrevisie at top 4
IEE has suborderie at top
SEI fits better (conflictors are not bad at a distance). also it has superego and subrevisie at bottom. mb it's your type
Very interesting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
You said in the first post that I shouldn't focus on romantic interests, just people who I feel comfortable around, so that is what I picked. Is this the correct way to do it?
Maybe that confused you a little. I don't think I'm an F type. I very rarely talk to people. I don't seek human interaction. I'm very focused on work and my interests. I don't celebrate birthdays (mine), I don't attend parties or weddings unless pressured or I think it would look really bad and would cause drama where there is none, and I would only do it for very few people. The rest can think whatever they want. I really don't care. I'm an extreme loner. I have very few friends and the ones I have I don't even try to keep in touch with. Basically, if we have no current hobby or interest that we share and I don't have to invest a lot of time to get their attention then I have no reason to speak with them.
If we are in the same room, I will talk to them, if not, I'm not going to call or plan anything. I'm the asshole who people call every 4 months to check that they are still alive. I can entertain myself. I don't care to keep in touch if I think you are going to be fine without me, like if I'm not worried about their safety or something. I do make time for people when they reach out and I will do whatever I can to help if they need it, but it's not going to be constant. I'm very independent and can't stand leeches. But I also care about people's well being. If they are young, I will be there for them, but once they reach a certain age I treat all adults the same and they are responsible for themselves, emotionally and financially. I make exceptions for the people who actually follow my advice (which is not easy, I make very detailed instructions) and are just unable to do better. But I'm very busy doing things that interest me like reading and increasing my knowledge, investing, etc. and I'm very protective of my free time.
Thank you for taking the time to do this, I always wanted to understand your reasoning, this kind of makes sense. I tried to do it alone and wasn't sure how you would arrive at a type using your method.
You don't have defend your typing. I have what I want. Thank you again.
people which inspire friendly sympathy. by the recommendationsQuote:
Originally Posted by COOL AND MANLY
> I don't think I'm an F type
T types are more personally attracted ("soul" attraction) and more find as pleasant F people, which give them higher irrational friendly sympathy. T for T are some boring as persons. More clear this is for people of other sex. Own sex is significantly associated with a cooperation and a competing than close friendship, so this may shift sympathies to closer types.
You've chosen 3 base T as giving the most friendly sympathy to you. Not just T, but base T. And not just near top prevail, but 3 T types are top. Your types preference gives good chance for F.
I may look at your video to get additional info about your type
That is fine. That is your opinion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
I will say that I'm still not sure exactly what you mean by friendly sympathy, especially towards the opposite sex. If you mean friends, then yes most of my friends are mostly T types, all male. So this kind of test doesn't help.
I don't believe in having a soulmate.
Also, what about people who enjoy both sexes? How do you judge their attraction? This is kind of funny. But I understand your reasoning.
No, thank you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
Sol loves to type people who don't value Fe as SEI and other Fe valuing types, lol, it's amusing.
If you used the test according to the recommendations, then with high possibility your type is F. What is friendly sympathy is evident.Quote:
Originally Posted by COOL AND MANLY
Your forum's communications does not exclude F type. :)
So your type was more clear, I need your video.
P.S. to add your sex in the profile is useful
It is, but it kind of makes sense though. How amused would you be if he didn't share his reasoning? I appreciate that he is willing to explain himself.Quote:
Originally Posted by bouncingoffclouds
He uses process of elimination to arrive at the type which is logical, and it looks like because my first three preferences were all base T he eliminated all T types for me. Which is kind of extreme, he immediately lowered his chances of getting the type correctly by 50 percent. I think that is his biggest mistake. But I think it can be improved. I don't know what he would have done if I had a mix of T and F up there, I will just look at his other posts to find out.
Then he relies on Intertype Relations as described by socionics to choose which relations are most comfortable and which are not. This is fine.
It's a two step process. Very simple actually. I like it.
I do think I value Fe btw. My hatred for Fi is actually much higher and deeper. It just that my Fi is more developed. I self-type as LII.
No worries, friend. I'm male.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
@Sol
By the way. This is assuming that all your typings are correct, which I very much doubt. But in the spirit of being fair, I played along.
I still enjoyed your test.
@COOL AND MANLY
the most useful you may do to understand own type is to make a videointerview
unlike with F, your concrete F type is lesser clear
The best I can do is send you a picture in private if you want. Even my mom doesn't have a video of me. I don't like the attention.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
@somnambulat0ry
top 2 and bottom 2 the only common trait have T. where top are Ti and bottom Te. so Fe ego is rather possible
against ESE are its suborderie and subrevisie in top 4
against IEI are superego and suborderie in top 4
SEI and some lesser EIE - seem as most possible for you
You may post a videointerview sometimes, in case doubts will stay. Better under another account and empty profile to get more independent opinions. This may add points to some of possible types. Generally it takes a time to understand own type with assurance. In my case it took about a year to type people IRL and to find what type fits good to IR with them. I recommend such checking to be sure in own type.Quote:
Originally Posted by somnambulat0ry
1. EII
2. SEE
3. LSE
4. IEE
5. LIE
6. SLI
7. LSI
8. LII
9. ESI
10. ILI
11. ILE
12. IEI
13. SLE
14. ESE
15. SEI
16. EIE
Interestygly I felt quite strong sympathy for the first five types automatically. And the most to SEE and EII. In the case of IEE, some of them rejected me a bit. Because they behaved as if they had ADHD. But these are just a few people, the rest arouse my sympathy. Fi group smiles are nice and look such natural ones and honest.
The rest types is rather average and ok. I noticed a tendency not to like Fe types (Creative and Dominant). They seem as if they were doing it for show. They seem emotionally immature, artificial, insincere, sometimes even annoying. IEI is the most bearable. Most suppressed. EIE worst.... They intentionally behave as if they were doing something for the show. Some people are ok, but generally They behave as just clowning. The SEI facial expression is annoying. As for ILE and SLe, I was totally confused. For ILE a few people clowning and expression annoyed me. But otherwise the whole picture of this type was quite ok that. Some SLE are ok and some are not (Most). It was really hard to choose. And I could think about it for a long time. But I've already wasted enough time on it.....
@NuclearWar666
in top 3 Fi types + in bottom 3 Fe -> Te type, at least Te/Fi value. 4th types are Te at top and Ti at bottom, what supports the value too
gamma-delta is rather possible
mb excluded SEE/ILI, having suborderie and subrevisie at top
It would look like this after deeper reflection. It's too hard to predict from 1 -16 which types I like best. So i did it like that. After that, I came to the conclusion that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
1. EII and SEE
2. LSE, IEE and LIE
3. SLI, LSI and LII
4. ILE and IEI
5. ILI and ESI
6. SLE and ESE
7. SEI and EIE
I think IEI and ILE are slightly better than ILI and ESI. Most ILI is be completely cold.... It is difficult to arouse sympathy for me. Although they look quite professional which is an advantage. Most ESI aretotally neuter again....
But at least they don't annoy me as in the case of SLE or ESE or even more so EIE or SEI.
@NuclearWar666
Full sorting is more interesting, anyway.
You have good chance to be Fi valued.
Also. At top you had 3 Fi and at bottom 3 Fe, 4th were T types of same valued F. Besides Fi value (which is good possible), this may point on Te type. After ILI exclusion, as most possible types stay: LSE, LIE, SLI
"I think I can be SLI. In the dichotomies covered result first ISTp, the next ISFj comes out. And from test always SLI. I just want to be more certain." (link)
By IR test SLI is among most possible. There were 3 deltas at top.
Having this match of different methods is a basis to pay more attention on SLI. Then LSE and LIE.
You may make a video and place it in a typing thread or pm. Maybe this will add something.
The only good way to be assured in your type is by IR effects with people IRL and their behavior. Them you'll need to type yourself by different methods, including tests.
I agree with you on IEI men vs. women. I don't know why, but so many IEI men I've known in real have been super messed up, whereas this has not been the case with the women. Actually I do have theories relating to their place in society, but ehQuote:
Originally Posted by ergot
I've already recorded a video in a typing thread, but I was a little drunk then and I behaved somewhat differently than usually.
Should I record another questionnaire? Or maybe just a short video?
Typing video should be without alcohol.Quote:
Originally Posted by NuclearWar666
> Should I record another questionnaire? Or maybe just a short video?
Another questionnaire is redundant. Video is useful for nonverbal info.
1 SEI
2LIE
3 ESE
4LSI
5 SLE
6 ESI
7 LSE
8 IEI
9 SEE
10 ILE
11 IEE
12 EIE
13 LII
14 SLI
15 EII
16 ILI
Mmh so what is the meaning of this ?
@Sah Kel Plaisir
Fe value and mb introvertion
I was little stressed out by recording. So I decided to relieve my stress symptoms with alcohol.... It wasn't a good idea because I didn't come out naturally anyway. I made another movies (being sober - not drunk) and some expert in microexpressionein Vultology (Not I don't know as far as this theory has sense and how compatible with socionics, but he has stated that I am Jungian Ni-Te. And less probably Si-Te. Generally He can see gestures and facial expressions typical mainly for Te and for IXXP temperament.... He also found a lot for Fi... But he's not sure my type. Because he found signals typical of Ni-Se (more signals) and some for Si-Ne. I have received the entire report on this. I hope you understood my words. My English is not very good...
Socionics uses Jung types too. Main problem is from practical side: how good a method is used.Quote:
Originally Posted by NuclearWar666
For example, that he associates with Fi, but both people are not such in my perception - it's Fe from Ti and from seems Fe type.
So it's useful to see your video.
GREAT
SEE / ESFP
SLE / ESTP
SEI / ISFP
SLI / ISTP
NICE
ESI / ISFJ
IEI / INFP
LSI / ISTJ
ILI / INTP
LIE / ENTJ
ESE / ESFJ
MEH
EII / INFJ
LSE / ESTJ
IEE / ENFP
AVOID
ILE / ENTP
EIE / ENFJ
LII / INTJ
@one
IN*P
Thanks @Sol, what do you think is the best way to figure out which INxp type I am? I read the descriptions for INTp and INFp, leaning towards INTp but I might be wrong.
Your behavior is closer to F types.Quote:
Originally Posted by one
You've asigned emotional groups in the test. Your avatar is "playful", not serious.
To be highly assured in own type are used IR effects with people IRL. You may try to understand T or F types are more attractive and interesting for you. SLE or SEE is more comfortable to communicate IRL. etc
Hm. I'm gonna have to find an SEE then as I don't have an idea where they are. But I do know an ESTp and we mesh together very well, the problem is he loves to be in parties a lot and I don't think I'll be with someone like that. And I don't see Fe creative in me, I seem to be a destroyer of fun in groups even when I don't intend to.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
Also just to clarify, my avatar has some scattered elements to it, but it isn't playful at all. I wouldn't really use that as a measure, my previous avatar which is like a black hole/circular mass of void could be classified as serious.
For the emotional grouping, I did add that because to make it clear that there was a wide gap among the group (like SEI has +1 difference from SLI while SLI has greater than 1 difference from ESI.
But anyways I'll read more about INFps and Fe because that could be my actual type. I assume INFps aren't necessarily friendly and can be considered very cold as well.
It's useful to have several examples of same type to understand your perception. Also it's possbily to change opinions about some peoples' types later.Quote:
Originally Posted by one
> For the emotional grouping, I did add that because to make it clear that there was a wide gap among the group (like SEI has +1 difference from SLI while SLI has greater than 1 difference from ESI.
Those were not strong traits to be sure in your F type, just lesser common for T types.
With a videointerview I may try to undersand your type by nonverbal.
> I assume INFps aren't necessarily friendly and can be considered very cold as well.
Theory describes an average case. Farther a behavior is from it - the lesser possibility of that type. IR effects with close people IRL is most weighty to decide about own type.
Video interview - will a video of me answering a questionnaire suffice? If yes I can provide that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
The main info is nonverbal. You may tell about anything interesting for you during ~10 min.Quote:
Originally Posted by one
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...=1#post1096450
@one by video was seen as T type. where INTP has good possibility
A higher than average chance to find SEE is in palces, groups, events related to: art, sport, trading.
To notice is possibly in general public places. 1/16 is not small where are hundreds of people.
People of some type could be among known IRL during the life, with who you communicated and mb even significantly. It needs to think who.
May be used sites where exists info to suppose types.
Thanks @Sol. I haven't been attending sports/trading events and I mostly stick to who I am with when going out so that's why I probably don't meet SEE.
People mostly communicate with ones having similar skills and practical interests (hence similar types), more make relations of pals and colleagues for surface cooperations.Quote:
Originally Posted by one
Personal interest of soul attraction is higher in pairs relations between sexes. There a difference attracts more and duals have higher % than among pals (of your sex).
SEE could be among random groups and meetings. Alike your relatives, neighbours, classmates (if it's general class and not specialized). Also, people of any types can be in interests&abbilities related places too - just some types are more rare there. When you'll be studing types and trying to understand types of people near mb you'll notice some. Where you notice a human of SF club - there could be SEE easily too.
Long-time sellers in shops and markets - an example of SF region and you could communicate with them. A lot of public duties with significant manual part and communications with people.
@Sol do you mostly type by non-verbal? I do think that humans can have the tendency to lie or give answers to questionnaires that don't reflect reality, so I am thinking maybe visual typing can give more accuracy. I do notice similar mannerisms in certain people. But have you experienced typing by both expressions and actions (or questionnaire if you will) and get two different types?
Often.Quote:
Originally Posted by one
To understand the whole type by common behavior as main method needs special typing methods as questionnaires, interview and tests, or to know that people rather good. Also for typing by questionnaires, interview and tests, - typed ones should do not know typology theory, as in other case they may significantly distort the info (more mistakes than a lie).
Types related nonverbal behavior is more stable to external distortions what makes VI as main approach in many cases. Words are useful as secondary data there. Also it's useful to see a behavior and what a human does outside of typing process.
> I do think that humans can have the tendency to lie or give answers to questionnaires that don't reflect reality
People have not perfect self-perception (including when they want to have some traits) and different factors may influence on a behavior.
> so I am thinking maybe visual typing can give more accuracy
Nonverbal is part of useful data. The more of useful data is used - the higher accuracy may be.
Also VI is important as main approach in some situations.
> But have you experienced typing by both expressions and actions (or questionnaire if you will) and get two different types?
I may be assured by VI only too. In such cases it's hard to change my opinion or give doubts, as generally I may suppose nontypes factors which leaded to unusual behavior.
When I'm not assured by VI only - then common behavior which does not fit good to my impressions arises doubts.
Note to @Sol: some of the YouTube links in your test no longer work.
It's common problem that some clips are removed after a time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aramas
Generally, it's possibly to find that channel by its name and to watch other clips on it. Or when that channel was not found - to use other available clips from the list, the number of which may be useful for the testing still.
Allright @Sol I did your little test. I tried not to think about their types or if you've typed correctly or not and just went by vibes. Only females, many of the videos were gone but I found at least one for each type.
The results from best to worst:
1. IEI
2. SEI
3. EIE
4. EII
5. SLE
6. LSI
7. ILI
8. SEE
9. LII
10. SLI
11. LSE
12. ESE
13. ILE
14. ESI
15. IEE
16. LIE
Edit: In some cases physical attractiveness was pretty important. Like some of the EII chicks were cute, the SLE were too masculine but I felt like communication would be pretty perfect. Also some examples of a type I liked and others I didn't (ESI sorted by the one terrible woman, SEI sorted by dropping out the most annoying one because others were pretty good).
@Northstar
You like FN, among them Fe are prefered. Also you dislike Ne and Fi types.
Among ST betas SLE has _some_ higher chance than LSI by the test.
I stay with LSI, anyway. Taking all the known.
> just went by vibes
Not well known people as bloggers and famouses are typed close to "just". As you notice, there is sense in results and not something random.
Nonverbal VI has objective proof to be working approach. The accuracy depends on skills by any method.
> I found at least one for each type.
Recommended is ">=3" per type and >=2 clips per a human. Where clips have disappeared should be possibly to find channels by names.
The list should be updated later. It can be useful to recheck impressions from types after 12 monthes, mb with updated list.
@Sol
I'm working my way through these videos but am having trouble deciding what to make of #5. They feel very "comfortable" and I don't know that I'd describe my reaction as "alienated," but also they aren't particularly interesting to me. While I feel they'd be easy to understand, I doubt I'd particularly be interested in talking with those people unless I had a certain, external reason for it. I guess they seem somewhat boring to me. Given this description would you recommend I rank them high, low, or toward the middle?
Edit: also having similar problems for other types, like #8 -- feel less like I'd be bored with them, but there is a slight element of feeling "too" familiar. I think what's confusing me is the distinction between "comfort" and "friendly sympathy." I apologize if this is difficult to understand; it’s hard to describe the sort of intuitive impressions you ask for.
Another edit: I'm having trouble sleeping so went ahead and ranked them all + gave a short blurb explaining my ranking, since I'm not sure if my ranking was as it was supposed to be. I tried to rank by a feeling of similarity/non-repulsion.
1. ISFJ. Generally on the same page. I understand them and feel they'd understand me. As the instructions stated, I'm not taking sexual attraction into consideration (I didn't find them very attractive).
2. INTP. They seemed likable to me. I was surprised when I saw the key; I thought these were F types.
3. ESTJ. Give off good energy. Might be tiring after a while, but I can last a while on it. Had trouble disentangling sexual interest from this one; not entirely sure this shouldn't be lower.
4. ENTP. Sense of relation + likability. As I said, a few mannerisms feel irritating because of familiarity, but the feeling quickly passes.
5. INTJ. Cute. A little sweet. Often got a sense they were too self-absorbed, but it didn't irritate me that much. Felt fairly comfortable, though I had a sense we might not know what to do with each other after long.
6. ISTJ. Sense of relation starts fading with this type. Mannerisms start to seem weirder beginning with them, but still I feel we'd be on good footing together; work together well.
7. INFP. Slightly more strange. It seemed to me that many were shallow, and I'm not sure that's fair given that many of those impressions came from Russian videos. But I liked them/felt sympathy.
8. ISFP. More relation than INFPs, but I had the sense it would be draining to talk with them after a while.
9. ENFP. Didn't feel much relation, but liked them a lot. I don't feel they'd like me that much.
10. ISTP. Had a decent sense of relation to them, but I liked some and disliked others. Here begins my dislikes.
11. INFJ. As I wrote above. Again, I did relate quite a bit -- not sure this shouldn't be higher.
12. ENFJ -- Don't really dislike them, but don't relate at all. Wasn't sure what to make of them. I was surprised again by the key, here. The videos I watched didn't seem very expressive.
13. ENTJ. Slight dislike. Again, not sure what else to say about this type.
14. ESTP. I didn't have a strong revulsion to this type, but something seemed off. I didn't have any sense I'd describe as "friendly" here. Maybe "guarded and distrustful" would be an appropriate description.
15. ESFJ. I don't relate to/understand this mindset at all. Didn't like most of the women I saw. When I looked at the key, I was surprised I rated this type so low.
16. ESFP. Some were a little better than others, but I did not really like this type at all. Which again surprised me because IRL I don't feel I mind the type that much.
I mentioned a few surprises, but I guessed the type correctly for ILEs, LIIs, and ESIs before looking at the key. I wasn't sure which type the EIIs were until I watched the ESI videos, then when going back over the EII videos to sort them I realized. Not knowing Russian makes it difficult to type.
1. ESI
2. EII
3. LIE
4. SLI
5. EIE
6. LSE
7. SEE
8. IEE
9. SEI
10. ESE
11. LII
12. ILE
13. SLE
14. LSI
15. ILI
16. IEI
@DEAD
IEE
SLE
SEE (SEE not being on top because those videos don't have enough the creative energy level that I want (I like creative (high Se -Ne) subtype).)
ILI
EII
SLI
EIE (EIE much higher than expect)
LSI
LIE (LIE and ESI are surprisingly low here)
ESI
ILE
LII
IEI (Don't know why IEI is too low here.)
LSE (look dumb)
SEI
ESE (Only ESE and SEI videos really make me feel dislike from the very beginning and I did not know their type yet. Especially ESE videos, feel like I'm being attacked. Conflict relationship is really a thing.)
@FreelancePoliceman
You prefer T types, as it's 3/4 of top4 and 5/6 of top. It's expected for F type.
You don't like base Se types which are in bottom4 to exclude ILI.
Against LII is superego as best and dual as 2nd worst.
You like some more Te, what points on Fi.
EII has a dual in top4. Top4 has all quadras except betas, while bottom4 has all quadras except deltas.
Among delta F, EII is more possible than IEE, which has subrevisie as best and dual below average.
Based on your forum talking.
I doubt in Fe, S, P.
That you differ from lesser humans centered LII, I've mentioned before.
With IR test result, the chance to have EII is higher than LII.
The sorting criterion is about being comfortable and friendly. Other is secondary.Quote:
Originally Posted by FreelancePoliceman
Good IR as duals are perceived as comfortable. Also duals are more interesting than people with close to you functional strenghtes.
> I guess they seem somewhat boring to me. Given this description would you recommend I rank them high, low, or toward the middle?
high of middle. possible types with same ego functions
> I think what's confusing me is the distinction between "comfort" and "friendly sympathy."
It's about a state when you are among good friends. With a dual you are easier to feel as with a friend. Hence you are feeling the most good/comfortably with them and higher friendly sympathy to them among all types. More relates to people of other sex.
after spending much of the day, my results, loosely sorted:
All Deltas except SEE instead of IEE > Rational SFs > Gamma NTs > Beta rationals > Fi Polrs > Te Polrs > IEEs and LIIs being the lowest
Delta immediately followed by Gamma. But IEE and alpha at bottom
Edit: but alphas arent really bottom if ESE is so high. im all fkd up. whats ur input @Sol ? just LSI regardless?
useful for an analysis are all sorted 16 types names. in case you may place the sorting's variant done before have opened the keyQuote:
Originally Posted by ashlesha
anyway, your type is LSI
the test is not absolute method and it's in early development state
This test was pretty accurate for myself with EII being the top spot. Might have to look into VI again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
ESFJ > INTP > ESTJ > INFP > ISTJ > ISTP > ENTJ > ESFP > ISFP > ISFJ > ENFP > INTJ > ENTP > INFJ > ENFJ > ESTP
Im considering Beta NF as my type but who knows, i also considser lii but not likely? Considering results, what are the options?
Btw im male if it matters