Most people today do enjoy the functions the most, having single definitions for them and so. But isnt the context of the model really what is important? The IEI and ILI do not have the same experiences of what Se is for example?
Printable View
Most people today do enjoy the functions the most, having single definitions for them and so. But isnt the context of the model really what is important? The IEI and ILI do not have the same experiences of what Se is for example?
Yeah interrelations. What else I enjoy is seeing the elements showing up blocked in speech.
The Conscious/Unconscious dichotomy is undervalued. People will talk about how LIIs or LSIs "have" Ni or Fe for example, when they at best have a really strange and only indirectly interpretable relationship with the two, not to mention when the myopia of low-dimensionality comes in. Their conscious contents are "tainted" by these IEs, but never to the point of competent expression.
Idk what you're talking about.
Why not just switch types and find out?