Printable View
This one gives interesting results. Very extensive and detailed in two parts.
Results look like this:
http://i.imgur.com/iScPcNj.png
KEY:
- 45 - 60 = Strong indicator for type
- 30 - 44 = Possible indicator for type
- 15 - 29 = Weak indicator for type
- 0 - 14 = Very weak indicator for type
http://i.imgur.com/6BYfHVM.png
82 - 108 = Strong indicator for subtype arena
56 - 82 = Possible indicator for subtype arena
29 - 55 = Weak indicator for subtype arena
0 - 28 = Very weak indicator for subtype arena
@Vespertine I haven't checked it, is it in your resource list?
http://i.imgur.com/SnDFIwT.jpg
6>1>4>9>8=3>5>2>7
http://i.imgur.com/T8pHLQQ.jpg
sp>sx>so
Don't get cocky, Andy. Don't. Get. Cocky.
Damn Foodie! Set them on fire!! :flame:Quote:
Originally Posted by Food
I'm wondering about how they distinguished counterphobic and phobic there.
https://media.tenor.co/images/c96f08...1068/tenor.gif
I want your result here @Adam Strange my friend!
The subtype file was blocked by my virus scanner so I skipped it.
http://i.imgur.com/qY1e2SV.png
Ahh damn, mine said it's okay :shrug: Although it's pretty clear you're SX/SP. :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylen
Striking here: 4 notoriously outrules any other type - because of its drive to differ so much :lol: Ya literally stand out right there! Cool.
I'll try to do it this weekend. I hope.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chae
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...0c8c2eae2f.jpg
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...c9259781bb.jpg
:halo:
I'd say the relative uniformity in the type results (first graph) indicate 9 > 1 (and definitely > 4).
Thanks for sharing this test @Chae, its a really good one!
But now I'm really confused about my tritype...
I'm just sure that I'm 9w8 almost 8w9, and that I'm 5 with almost balanced wings... :lol:
Attachment 10131
Attachment 10132
I noticed that too right as you posted. I turned off the extension so I could take the other test. :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by Chae
http://i.imgur.com/fCCpg0f.png
*smooch* Thanks love :oops: And many props to Rhodes. If you don't mind the effort, can you take it again using more extreme scores? The more 3s and 0s you assign, the more polarized the result - I think that would help the overall distribution because it's all in the "weak indicator of type" category :lol: For the instincts as well, how did you even manage that SP and SX are the same!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Slugabed
That the scores are even and not blatant is typically 9ish of you though, the ultimate harmony :hello:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chae
I'll try to force it but I'm not sure of succeeding…all my scores on enneagram tests are always the same.
I think that I experience Sx/Sp on same proportion… I need the other but I'm fine by myself too, and my preservation is as important as the merging with other.
I think that all of this has something to do with being 9 indeed. I must be really harmonic...thats what the basic indifferent/laid-back/peaceful 9 trait is all about maybe... being a really blurry unpersonalized person. :lol:
Edit: @Chae, here my results, trying the best without compromising too much my original intentions. I see now 9w8 and 5w6
Attachment 10133
There you go! :3 Heart center is consistently 4 (not 2 as we discussed) but by small margin, don't know what to do with that :thinking:Quote:
Originally Posted by Slugabed
Yesss and there it is XDQuote:
Originally Posted by Aylen
https://s8.postimg.org/f32rvehxx/butt.png
ouch @ attachment triad deficit
@woofwoofl Woof the instincts are one paragraph below on the site.
Attachment 10142
I dont have a 5 wing nor 5 fix. Tests cant get 5 right in people for some reason.
Attachment 10143
This is almost super similar to @Aylen's. Wowie. Both 3 and 5 are in the weak indicator range anyway, that'd need some fine-tuning! How do you relate to 5 in contrast to 3 in particular, and what did you determine as your head triad fix?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost
Thank you for posting this, it's time to doubt my type again!
https://s16.postimg.org/b9t82koit/image.png
So according to these results I'm a 4w5, then most likely 9w1 and 7w6. I've read the description of the 479 tritype few time before and it doesn't really fit, that's why I rather go with 469 but I know very well 7 has always been strong in me. Another option is that I could be a 471, because my 1 score was quite high too. I'm pretty sure I'm not 461 because they're too rule oriented and I'm the messiest, lest organized person I can think of. Well I'm definitely not an 8 or a 2, but those are always my lowest socres so that fits.
The subtype test was a surprise :shock:
https://s24.postimg.org/kkqquhrz9/image.png So maybe I'm really an sx first, I've been told a lot of times that I seem like sx first but damn I do not relate to sx 4s.
What i dont relate to in some 4w3s is that they are way too much "look at me", and also they fit in better and are even often popular, though they would never call themselves that -_-. They are not what I call aliens. I feel like an autistic weirdo alien born out of satans vagina. But i also want to be attractive and wanted and appreciated in a 3 way. 4w5s are less competitive than I am and more granular. So this is why subwings are awesome. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Chae
My head fix is 6. I have alot of anxiety and self-doubt, and I pay attention to risks and threats.
Attachment 10183
Attachment 10184
Apparently I scored a type on this test. Not too far off, I could have a 1w9 in my tritype.
The stacking was surprising, SP/SX/SO.
Attachment 10185
Attachment 10186
@Chae TIA!
one thing I noticed that I thought was interesting was that my "So" score was actually higher than yours (even though my Sp score was overall higher than So on both mine and yours) ... as I'd mentioned before I identified with Sx/So for a while and had some trouble choosing between that, Sx/Sp, and Sp/Sx, mainly.
Ok, thanks! Yes, also the enneagram results in comparison. I'm "eightier" than you and everybody else except woof by three points, how did that happen! :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by niffer
Here we go - then, affiliative actions (SO) are out of the equation? Would you say you are cognizant of peers, societal trends, groups? Or is it more of a hassle? Social lasters would say it's a nuisance and not part of their business, probably even failing to advance the issue because they transfer to SP or SX first.
I think trends and fads are a nuisance and whatever makes people follow and perpetuate them is the devil, but I would like to exploit people's sheep mentality using knowledge of it when I can. I'll do affiliative actions if it seems like it will be beneficial for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chae
Yes, that's social blind spot attitude. Beneficial for yourself indicates SP - would you say you do this overtly, or does this self-care act sort of linger in the background? (That's to determine if SP first or second)Quote:
Originally Posted by niffer
http://i.hizliresim.com/37gpWA.png
Looks pretty good, though 5 and 9 probably should be opposite. 9w1 likely according to that. Kind of surprised with high 4 and 2 actually, pretty uncertain with heart-fix. 5 might have either wings but more likely to have 6. Instincts were spot-on though.
http://i.hizliresim.com/nRyJaV.png
It's pretty controlled and deliberate I feel.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chae
That's more SP-secondary. Since the dominant instinct is out of control no matter how hard you try :lol: Ok, to confirm SX/SP - what is your stance regarding human life? Broad question but really, would you say you'd rather not participate in this game or do you go with the times, even if people as a whole don't interest you to much? Do you mind your own + other people's business or is there a sense of overall rejection?Quote:
Originally Posted by niffer
Quote:
Originally Posted by mclane
Wow ok that's unexpected! I'd say 5>4 and SP>SX here.
I feel like other people are going to always be a part of life. I'd rather not have to spend time thinking about that stuff beyond my immediate circle, but I naturally do, kind of compulsively sometimes, just because I feel like I have to to get by.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chae
Synflow :biggrin: SX/SP it is.Quote:
Originally Posted by niffer
Really? How come synflow?Quote:
Originally Posted by Chae
Synflow: Drawn/compelled towards people.Quote:
Originally Posted by niffer
Contraflow: Move away from people/ the human condition.
Yes, just as @Shaebette said, synflow fits you nicely! Np loveQuote:
Originally Posted by niffer
:bighug:
Then you'd be wrong =PQuote:
Originally Posted by Chae
You misunderstood, it was counting in my knowledge about you to resolve the almost 50/50 situation :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by mclane
@Vespertine Yeah, and definitely - captain obvious - as far away from 8 as possible :lol:
Why are the instinct bars upside down, compatibility problems?
Ah! Exactly - and that your wing preference stands out so much is only an affirmation of that. You can see that in the examples of our enneagram 4 people earlier in the thread, or my result where I could literally only be 3 winging to 4 or 8 winging to 7.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vespertine
Attachment 10230
This test puts me at 4, but I am a 9. It got the tritype right though, 947 - just not the right order.
damn this test rates me high in 4, ... my order is 8, 7, 4, 5, 2, 9, 3, 1, 6
Oh o.O Did you screenshot it? To see the proportions. That sounds much like our prediction from the enneagram thread, had you as 874 or 864 there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Satan
Some tests type me as sx/so and some as sx/sp, hmm. I wasn't expecting social to be that low though.
Attachment 16739
Attachment 16740